A brief intervention to minimize psychosexual morbidity in dyads coping with breast cancer

Carol L. Decker, Shobha Pais, Kathy Miller, Robert Goulet, Betsy L. Fife

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: To develop and evaluate the feasibility of a brief intervention to attenuate the incidence of psychosexual morbidity within the dyad secondary to the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Design: Quasiexperimental, including intervention and treatment-as-usual comparison groups. Setting: Breast clinic of a comprehensive cancer center in the Midwest United States. Sample: 65 recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors who were pre- or perimenopausal and aged 20-55 years, and their partners. Methods: Three intervention sessions were delivered based on a manual developed for the study. Twenty-five dyads received treatment as usual, 26 dyads received a face-to-face intervention, and 14 dyads received the same intervention by telephone. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, following completion of the intervention, six months postintervention, and from the comparison group at equivalent data points. Main Research Variables: Intimacy, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment. Findings: About 98% of dyads completed all intervention sessions, with an equal level of satisfaction among those in the telephone and face-to-face groups. Interesting trends in differences between the intervention and comparison groups on the relationship variables of intimacy, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment were obtained; however, given the sample size, power was not sufficient to reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The intervention is feasible and acceptable for dyads comfortable discussing their relationship. Intervention by telephone was demonstrated to be as effective as the face-to-face mode of delivery. Implications for Nursing: Nurses need to provide an opportunity for women to discuss problems they are experiencing relative to sexuality, intimacy, and body image.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-185
Number of pages10
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Telephone
Social Adjustment
Breast Neoplasms
Morbidity
Body Image
Sexuality
Sample Size
Survivors
Breast
Nursing
Therapeutics
Nurses
Incidence
Research
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

A brief intervention to minimize psychosexual morbidity in dyads coping with breast cancer. / Decker, Carol L.; Pais, Shobha; Miller, Kathy; Goulet, Robert; Fife, Betsy L.

In: Oncology Nursing Forum, Vol. 39, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 176-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Decker, Carol L. ; Pais, Shobha ; Miller, Kathy ; Goulet, Robert ; Fife, Betsy L. / A brief intervention to minimize psychosexual morbidity in dyads coping with breast cancer. In: Oncology Nursing Forum. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 176-185.
@article{9f25aa5f31e74a43ab2e3ffb517c20b8,
title = "A brief intervention to minimize psychosexual morbidity in dyads coping with breast cancer",
abstract = "Purpose/Objectives: To develop and evaluate the feasibility of a brief intervention to attenuate the incidence of psychosexual morbidity within the dyad secondary to the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Design: Quasiexperimental, including intervention and treatment-as-usual comparison groups. Setting: Breast clinic of a comprehensive cancer center in the Midwest United States. Sample: 65 recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors who were pre- or perimenopausal and aged 20-55 years, and their partners. Methods: Three intervention sessions were delivered based on a manual developed for the study. Twenty-five dyads received treatment as usual, 26 dyads received a face-to-face intervention, and 14 dyads received the same intervention by telephone. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, following completion of the intervention, six months postintervention, and from the comparison group at equivalent data points. Main Research Variables: Intimacy, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment. Findings: About 98{\%} of dyads completed all intervention sessions, with an equal level of satisfaction among those in the telephone and face-to-face groups. Interesting trends in differences between the intervention and comparison groups on the relationship variables of intimacy, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment were obtained; however, given the sample size, power was not sufficient to reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The intervention is feasible and acceptable for dyads comfortable discussing their relationship. Intervention by telephone was demonstrated to be as effective as the face-to-face mode of delivery. Implications for Nursing: Nurses need to provide an opportunity for women to discuss problems they are experiencing relative to sexuality, intimacy, and body image.",
author = "Decker, {Carol L.} and Shobha Pais and Kathy Miller and Robert Goulet and Fife, {Betsy L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1188/12.ONF.176-185",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "176--185",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "1538-0688",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A brief intervention to minimize psychosexual morbidity in dyads coping with breast cancer

AU - Decker, Carol L.

AU - Pais, Shobha

AU - Miller, Kathy

AU - Goulet, Robert

AU - Fife, Betsy L.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Purpose/Objectives: To develop and evaluate the feasibility of a brief intervention to attenuate the incidence of psychosexual morbidity within the dyad secondary to the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Design: Quasiexperimental, including intervention and treatment-as-usual comparison groups. Setting: Breast clinic of a comprehensive cancer center in the Midwest United States. Sample: 65 recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors who were pre- or perimenopausal and aged 20-55 years, and their partners. Methods: Three intervention sessions were delivered based on a manual developed for the study. Twenty-five dyads received treatment as usual, 26 dyads received a face-to-face intervention, and 14 dyads received the same intervention by telephone. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, following completion of the intervention, six months postintervention, and from the comparison group at equivalent data points. Main Research Variables: Intimacy, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment. Findings: About 98% of dyads completed all intervention sessions, with an equal level of satisfaction among those in the telephone and face-to-face groups. Interesting trends in differences between the intervention and comparison groups on the relationship variables of intimacy, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment were obtained; however, given the sample size, power was not sufficient to reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The intervention is feasible and acceptable for dyads comfortable discussing their relationship. Intervention by telephone was demonstrated to be as effective as the face-to-face mode of delivery. Implications for Nursing: Nurses need to provide an opportunity for women to discuss problems they are experiencing relative to sexuality, intimacy, and body image.

AB - Purpose/Objectives: To develop and evaluate the feasibility of a brief intervention to attenuate the incidence of psychosexual morbidity within the dyad secondary to the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Design: Quasiexperimental, including intervention and treatment-as-usual comparison groups. Setting: Breast clinic of a comprehensive cancer center in the Midwest United States. Sample: 65 recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors who were pre- or perimenopausal and aged 20-55 years, and their partners. Methods: Three intervention sessions were delivered based on a manual developed for the study. Twenty-five dyads received treatment as usual, 26 dyads received a face-to-face intervention, and 14 dyads received the same intervention by telephone. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, following completion of the intervention, six months postintervention, and from the comparison group at equivalent data points. Main Research Variables: Intimacy, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment. Findings: About 98% of dyads completed all intervention sessions, with an equal level of satisfaction among those in the telephone and face-to-face groups. Interesting trends in differences between the intervention and comparison groups on the relationship variables of intimacy, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment were obtained; however, given the sample size, power was not sufficient to reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The intervention is feasible and acceptable for dyads comfortable discussing their relationship. Intervention by telephone was demonstrated to be as effective as the face-to-face mode of delivery. Implications for Nursing: Nurses need to provide an opportunity for women to discuss problems they are experiencing relative to sexuality, intimacy, and body image.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859753267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859753267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/12.ONF.176-185

DO - 10.1188/12.ONF.176-185

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 176

EP - 185

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 1538-0688

IS - 2

ER -