A brief peer support intervention for veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain

A pilot study of feasibility and effectiveness

Marianne Matthias, Alan B. Mcguire, Marina Kukla, Joanne Daggy, Laura J. Myers, Matthew Bair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to pilot test a peer support intervention, involving peer delivery of pain self-management strategies, for veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Design: Pretest/posttest with 4-month intervention period. Methods: Ten peer coaches were each assigned 2 patients (N=20 patients). All had chronic musculoskeletal pain. Guided by a study manual, peer coach-patient pairs were instructed to talk biweekly for 4 months. Pain was the primary outcome and was assessed with the PEG, a three-item version of the Brief Pain Inventory, and the PROMIS Pain Interference Questionnaire. Several secondary outcomes were also assessed. To assess change in outcomes, a linear mixed model with a random effect for peer coaches was applied. Results: Nine peer coaches and 17 patients completed the study. All were male veterans. Patients' pain improved at 4 months compared with baseline but did not reach statistical significance (PEG: P=0.33, ICC [intra-class correlation]=0.28, Cohen's d=-0.25; PROMIS: P=0.17, d=-0.35). Of secondary outcomes, self-efficacy (P=0.16, ICC=0.56, d=0.60) and pain centrality (P=0.06, ICC=0.32, d=-0.62) showed greatest improvement, with moderate effect sizes. Conclusions: This study suggests that peers can effectively deliver pain self-management strategies to other veterans with pain. Although this was a pilot study with a relatively short intervention period, patients improved on several outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-87
Number of pages7
JournalPain Medicine
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Musculoskeletal Pain
Veterans
Chronic Pain
Pain
Pain Management
Self Care
Self Efficacy
Linear Models
Equipment and Supplies
Mentoring

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Pain management
  • Social support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

A brief peer support intervention for veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain : A pilot study of feasibility and effectiveness. / Matthias, Marianne; Mcguire, Alan B.; Kukla, Marina; Daggy, Joanne; Myers, Laura J.; Bair, Matthew.

In: Pain Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 81-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4571766d17c43baafa09e25c2d4ec7a,
title = "A brief peer support intervention for veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A pilot study of feasibility and effectiveness",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to pilot test a peer support intervention, involving peer delivery of pain self-management strategies, for veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Design: Pretest/posttest with 4-month intervention period. Methods: Ten peer coaches were each assigned 2 patients (N=20 patients). All had chronic musculoskeletal pain. Guided by a study manual, peer coach-patient pairs were instructed to talk biweekly for 4 months. Pain was the primary outcome and was assessed with the PEG, a three-item version of the Brief Pain Inventory, and the PROMIS Pain Interference Questionnaire. Several secondary outcomes were also assessed. To assess change in outcomes, a linear mixed model with a random effect for peer coaches was applied. Results: Nine peer coaches and 17 patients completed the study. All were male veterans. Patients' pain improved at 4 months compared with baseline but did not reach statistical significance (PEG: P=0.33, ICC [intra-class correlation]=0.28, Cohen's d=-0.25; PROMIS: P=0.17, d=-0.35). Of secondary outcomes, self-efficacy (P=0.16, ICC=0.56, d=0.60) and pain centrality (P=0.06, ICC=0.32, d=-0.62) showed greatest improvement, with moderate effect sizes. Conclusions: This study suggests that peers can effectively deliver pain self-management strategies to other veterans with pain. Although this was a pilot study with a relatively short intervention period, patients improved on several outcomes.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Pain management, Social support",
author = "Marianne Matthias and Mcguire, {Alan B.} and Marina Kukla and Joanne Daggy and Myers, {Laura J.} and Matthew Bair",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pme.12571",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "81--87",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A brief peer support intervention for veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain

T2 - A pilot study of feasibility and effectiveness

AU - Matthias, Marianne

AU - Mcguire, Alan B.

AU - Kukla, Marina

AU - Daggy, Joanne

AU - Myers, Laura J.

AU - Bair, Matthew

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to pilot test a peer support intervention, involving peer delivery of pain self-management strategies, for veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Design: Pretest/posttest with 4-month intervention period. Methods: Ten peer coaches were each assigned 2 patients (N=20 patients). All had chronic musculoskeletal pain. Guided by a study manual, peer coach-patient pairs were instructed to talk biweekly for 4 months. Pain was the primary outcome and was assessed with the PEG, a three-item version of the Brief Pain Inventory, and the PROMIS Pain Interference Questionnaire. Several secondary outcomes were also assessed. To assess change in outcomes, a linear mixed model with a random effect for peer coaches was applied. Results: Nine peer coaches and 17 patients completed the study. All were male veterans. Patients' pain improved at 4 months compared with baseline but did not reach statistical significance (PEG: P=0.33, ICC [intra-class correlation]=0.28, Cohen's d=-0.25; PROMIS: P=0.17, d=-0.35). Of secondary outcomes, self-efficacy (P=0.16, ICC=0.56, d=0.60) and pain centrality (P=0.06, ICC=0.32, d=-0.62) showed greatest improvement, with moderate effect sizes. Conclusions: This study suggests that peers can effectively deliver pain self-management strategies to other veterans with pain. Although this was a pilot study with a relatively short intervention period, patients improved on several outcomes.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to pilot test a peer support intervention, involving peer delivery of pain self-management strategies, for veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Design: Pretest/posttest with 4-month intervention period. Methods: Ten peer coaches were each assigned 2 patients (N=20 patients). All had chronic musculoskeletal pain. Guided by a study manual, peer coach-patient pairs were instructed to talk biweekly for 4 months. Pain was the primary outcome and was assessed with the PEG, a three-item version of the Brief Pain Inventory, and the PROMIS Pain Interference Questionnaire. Several secondary outcomes were also assessed. To assess change in outcomes, a linear mixed model with a random effect for peer coaches was applied. Results: Nine peer coaches and 17 patients completed the study. All were male veterans. Patients' pain improved at 4 months compared with baseline but did not reach statistical significance (PEG: P=0.33, ICC [intra-class correlation]=0.28, Cohen's d=-0.25; PROMIS: P=0.17, d=-0.35). Of secondary outcomes, self-efficacy (P=0.16, ICC=0.56, d=0.60) and pain centrality (P=0.06, ICC=0.32, d=-0.62) showed greatest improvement, with moderate effect sizes. Conclusions: This study suggests that peers can effectively deliver pain self-management strategies to other veterans with pain. Although this was a pilot study with a relatively short intervention period, patients improved on several outcomes.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Pain management

KW - Social support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921606880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921606880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pme.12571

DO - 10.1111/pme.12571

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 81

EP - 87

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 1

ER -