A calibrated paper clip is a reliable measure of two-point discrimination

John Finnell, Robert Knopp, Phelps Johnson, Patrick C. Holland, Warren Schubert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to compare two different instruments for assessing digital nerve function; a secondary aim was to determine interobserver agreement among emergency physicians by using static two-point testing of digital nerve function. Methods: This was a prospective, blinded, observational study of static two-point discrimination involving healthy volunteers aged 18-59 years. The authors compared two instruments (paper clip set or Disk-Criminator) to assess two-point discrimination of the index and long fingers of the dominant hand. For each subject, the initial investigator and initial testing instrument were randomized. Two-point testing was conducted at 4, 5, and 6 mm by using six randomly selected stimuli (1 or 2 points) for each distal phalanx tested. The study was designed to detect a 25% difference in mean two-point distance with a power of 80%. Results: Seventy-five subjects were entered into the study, of which two were excluded. Interinstrument agreement for a given investigator ranged from 77% to 84% for absolute agreement and 98% to 100% within 2 mm. Weighted kappa values for interobserver differences of 2 mm or less was 0.79 to 1.00. There was no statistically significant difference between instruments. Conclusions: Using a clinically relevant threshold of 2 mm, the authors found that a properly calibrated set of paper clips performed as well as the Disk-Criminator.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)710-714
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

Surgical Instruments
Research Personnel
Fingers
Observational Studies
Healthy Volunteers
Emergencies
Hand
Physicians

Keywords

  • Emergency medicine
  • Hand injuries/physiopathology
  • Hand/innervation
  • Reproducibility of results
  • Sensation disorders
  • Sensory thresholds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A calibrated paper clip is a reliable measure of two-point discrimination. / Finnell, John; Knopp, Robert; Johnson, Phelps; Holland, Patrick C.; Schubert, Warren.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 6, 06.2004, p. 710-714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Finnell, John ; Knopp, Robert ; Johnson, Phelps ; Holland, Patrick C. ; Schubert, Warren. / A calibrated paper clip is a reliable measure of two-point discrimination. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 710-714.
@article{8cb42b8573a04a43b2752b26ce76dc63,
title = "A calibrated paper clip is a reliable measure of two-point discrimination",
abstract = "Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to compare two different instruments for assessing digital nerve function; a secondary aim was to determine interobserver agreement among emergency physicians by using static two-point testing of digital nerve function. Methods: This was a prospective, blinded, observational study of static two-point discrimination involving healthy volunteers aged 18-59 years. The authors compared two instruments (paper clip set or Disk-Criminator) to assess two-point discrimination of the index and long fingers of the dominant hand. For each subject, the initial investigator and initial testing instrument were randomized. Two-point testing was conducted at 4, 5, and 6 mm by using six randomly selected stimuli (1 or 2 points) for each distal phalanx tested. The study was designed to detect a 25{\%} difference in mean two-point distance with a power of 80{\%}. Results: Seventy-five subjects were entered into the study, of which two were excluded. Interinstrument agreement for a given investigator ranged from 77{\%} to 84{\%} for absolute agreement and 98{\%} to 100{\%} within 2 mm. Weighted kappa values for interobserver differences of 2 mm or less was 0.79 to 1.00. There was no statistically significant difference between instruments. Conclusions: Using a clinically relevant threshold of 2 mm, the authors found that a properly calibrated set of paper clips performed as well as the Disk-Criminator.",
keywords = "Emergency medicine, Hand injuries/physiopathology, Hand/innervation, Reproducibility of results, Sensation disorders, Sensory thresholds",
author = "John Finnell and Robert Knopp and Phelps Johnson and Holland, {Patrick C.} and Warren Schubert",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2003.11.022",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "710--714",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A calibrated paper clip is a reliable measure of two-point discrimination

AU - Finnell, John

AU - Knopp, Robert

AU - Johnson, Phelps

AU - Holland, Patrick C.

AU - Schubert, Warren

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to compare two different instruments for assessing digital nerve function; a secondary aim was to determine interobserver agreement among emergency physicians by using static two-point testing of digital nerve function. Methods: This was a prospective, blinded, observational study of static two-point discrimination involving healthy volunteers aged 18-59 years. The authors compared two instruments (paper clip set or Disk-Criminator) to assess two-point discrimination of the index and long fingers of the dominant hand. For each subject, the initial investigator and initial testing instrument were randomized. Two-point testing was conducted at 4, 5, and 6 mm by using six randomly selected stimuli (1 or 2 points) for each distal phalanx tested. The study was designed to detect a 25% difference in mean two-point distance with a power of 80%. Results: Seventy-five subjects were entered into the study, of which two were excluded. Interinstrument agreement for a given investigator ranged from 77% to 84% for absolute agreement and 98% to 100% within 2 mm. Weighted kappa values for interobserver differences of 2 mm or less was 0.79 to 1.00. There was no statistically significant difference between instruments. Conclusions: Using a clinically relevant threshold of 2 mm, the authors found that a properly calibrated set of paper clips performed as well as the Disk-Criminator.

AB - Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to compare two different instruments for assessing digital nerve function; a secondary aim was to determine interobserver agreement among emergency physicians by using static two-point testing of digital nerve function. Methods: This was a prospective, blinded, observational study of static two-point discrimination involving healthy volunteers aged 18-59 years. The authors compared two instruments (paper clip set or Disk-Criminator) to assess two-point discrimination of the index and long fingers of the dominant hand. For each subject, the initial investigator and initial testing instrument were randomized. Two-point testing was conducted at 4, 5, and 6 mm by using six randomly selected stimuli (1 or 2 points) for each distal phalanx tested. The study was designed to detect a 25% difference in mean two-point distance with a power of 80%. Results: Seventy-five subjects were entered into the study, of which two were excluded. Interinstrument agreement for a given investigator ranged from 77% to 84% for absolute agreement and 98% to 100% within 2 mm. Weighted kappa values for interobserver differences of 2 mm or less was 0.79 to 1.00. There was no statistically significant difference between instruments. Conclusions: Using a clinically relevant threshold of 2 mm, the authors found that a properly calibrated set of paper clips performed as well as the Disk-Criminator.

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Hand injuries/physiopathology

KW - Hand/innervation

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Sensation disorders

KW - Sensory thresholds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942618998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942618998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2003.11.022

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2003.11.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 15175216

AN - SCOPUS:2942618998

VL - 11

SP - 710

EP - 714

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 6

ER -