A case of mistaken identity: Are reactive oxygen species actually reactive sulfide species?

Eric R. DeLeon, Yan Gao, Evelyn Huang, Maaz Arif, Nitin Arora, Alexander Divietro, Shivali Patel, Kenneth Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stepwise one-electron reduction of oxygen to water produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are chemically and biochemically similar to reactive sulfide species (RSS) derived from one-electron oxidations of hydrogen sulfide to elemental sulfur. Both ROS and RSS are endogenously generated and signal via protein thiols. Given the similarities between ROS and RSS, we wondered whether extant methods for measuring the former would also detect the latter. Here, we compared ROS to RSS sensitivity of five common ROS methods: redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein (roGFP), 2ʹ, 7ʹ-dihydrodichlorofluorescein, MitoSox Red, Amplex Red, and amperometric electrodes. All methods detected RSS and were as, or more, sensitive to RSS than to ROS. roGFP, arguably the “gold standard” for ROS measurement, was more than 200-fold more sensitive to the mixed polysulfide H2Sn (n = 1–8) than to H2O2. These findings suggest that RSS may be far more prevalent in intracellular signaling than previously appreciated and that the contribution of ROS may be overestimated. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that estimated daily sulfur metabolism and ROS production are approximately equal and the fact that both RSS and antioxidant mechanisms have been present since the origin of life, nearly 4 billion years ago, long before the rise in environmental oxygen 600 million years ago. Although ROS are assumed to be the most biologically relevant oxidants, our results question this paradigm. We also anticipate our findings will direct attention toward development of novel and clinically relevant anti- (RSS)-oxidants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)R549-R560
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Volume310
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Sulfides
Reactive Oxygen Species
Green Fluorescent Proteins
Sulfur
Oxidants
Oxidation-Reduction
Electrons
Oxygen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Sulfhydryl Compounds
Electrodes
Antioxidants
Water

Keywords

  • Analytical methods
  • Hydrogen peroxide
  • Polysulfides
  • Sulfide
  • Superoxide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

A case of mistaken identity : Are reactive oxygen species actually reactive sulfide species? / DeLeon, Eric R.; Gao, Yan; Huang, Evelyn; Arif, Maaz; Arora, Nitin; Divietro, Alexander; Patel, Shivali; Olson, Kenneth.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol. 310, No. 7, 01.04.2016, p. R549-R560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeLeon, Eric R. ; Gao, Yan ; Huang, Evelyn ; Arif, Maaz ; Arora, Nitin ; Divietro, Alexander ; Patel, Shivali ; Olson, Kenneth. / A case of mistaken identity : Are reactive oxygen species actually reactive sulfide species?. In: American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2016 ; Vol. 310, No. 7. pp. R549-R560.
@article{17b07efaeee941ea9863eeeac3195007,
title = "A case of mistaken identity: Are reactive oxygen species actually reactive sulfide species?",
abstract = "Stepwise one-electron reduction of oxygen to water produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are chemically and biochemically similar to reactive sulfide species (RSS) derived from one-electron oxidations of hydrogen sulfide to elemental sulfur. Both ROS and RSS are endogenously generated and signal via protein thiols. Given the similarities between ROS and RSS, we wondered whether extant methods for measuring the former would also detect the latter. Here, we compared ROS to RSS sensitivity of five common ROS methods: redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein (roGFP), 2ʹ, 7ʹ-dihydrodichlorofluorescein, MitoSox Red, Amplex Red, and amperometric electrodes. All methods detected RSS and were as, or more, sensitive to RSS than to ROS. roGFP, arguably the “gold standard” for ROS measurement, was more than 200-fold more sensitive to the mixed polysulfide H2Sn (n = 1–8) than to H2O2. These findings suggest that RSS may be far more prevalent in intracellular signaling than previously appreciated and that the contribution of ROS may be overestimated. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that estimated daily sulfur metabolism and ROS production are approximately equal and the fact that both RSS and antioxidant mechanisms have been present since the origin of life, nearly 4 billion years ago, long before the rise in environmental oxygen 600 million years ago. Although ROS are assumed to be the most biologically relevant oxidants, our results question this paradigm. We also anticipate our findings will direct attention toward development of novel and clinically relevant anti- (RSS)-oxidants.",
keywords = "Analytical methods, Hydrogen peroxide, Polysulfides, Sulfide, Superoxide",
author = "DeLeon, {Eric R.} and Yan Gao and Evelyn Huang and Maaz Arif and Nitin Arora and Alexander Divietro and Shivali Patel and Kenneth Olson",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/ajpregu.00455.2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "310",
pages = "R549--R560",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0193-1857",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A case of mistaken identity

T2 - Are reactive oxygen species actually reactive sulfide species?

AU - DeLeon, Eric R.

AU - Gao, Yan

AU - Huang, Evelyn

AU - Arif, Maaz

AU - Arora, Nitin

AU - Divietro, Alexander

AU - Patel, Shivali

AU - Olson, Kenneth

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Stepwise one-electron reduction of oxygen to water produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are chemically and biochemically similar to reactive sulfide species (RSS) derived from one-electron oxidations of hydrogen sulfide to elemental sulfur. Both ROS and RSS are endogenously generated and signal via protein thiols. Given the similarities between ROS and RSS, we wondered whether extant methods for measuring the former would also detect the latter. Here, we compared ROS to RSS sensitivity of five common ROS methods: redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein (roGFP), 2ʹ, 7ʹ-dihydrodichlorofluorescein, MitoSox Red, Amplex Red, and amperometric electrodes. All methods detected RSS and were as, or more, sensitive to RSS than to ROS. roGFP, arguably the “gold standard” for ROS measurement, was more than 200-fold more sensitive to the mixed polysulfide H2Sn (n = 1–8) than to H2O2. These findings suggest that RSS may be far more prevalent in intracellular signaling than previously appreciated and that the contribution of ROS may be overestimated. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that estimated daily sulfur metabolism and ROS production are approximately equal and the fact that both RSS and antioxidant mechanisms have been present since the origin of life, nearly 4 billion years ago, long before the rise in environmental oxygen 600 million years ago. Although ROS are assumed to be the most biologically relevant oxidants, our results question this paradigm. We also anticipate our findings will direct attention toward development of novel and clinically relevant anti- (RSS)-oxidants.

AB - Stepwise one-electron reduction of oxygen to water produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are chemically and biochemically similar to reactive sulfide species (RSS) derived from one-electron oxidations of hydrogen sulfide to elemental sulfur. Both ROS and RSS are endogenously generated and signal via protein thiols. Given the similarities between ROS and RSS, we wondered whether extant methods for measuring the former would also detect the latter. Here, we compared ROS to RSS sensitivity of five common ROS methods: redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein (roGFP), 2ʹ, 7ʹ-dihydrodichlorofluorescein, MitoSox Red, Amplex Red, and amperometric electrodes. All methods detected RSS and were as, or more, sensitive to RSS than to ROS. roGFP, arguably the “gold standard” for ROS measurement, was more than 200-fold more sensitive to the mixed polysulfide H2Sn (n = 1–8) than to H2O2. These findings suggest that RSS may be far more prevalent in intracellular signaling than previously appreciated and that the contribution of ROS may be overestimated. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that estimated daily sulfur metabolism and ROS production are approximately equal and the fact that both RSS and antioxidant mechanisms have been present since the origin of life, nearly 4 billion years ago, long before the rise in environmental oxygen 600 million years ago. Although ROS are assumed to be the most biologically relevant oxidants, our results question this paradigm. We also anticipate our findings will direct attention toward development of novel and clinically relevant anti- (RSS)-oxidants.

KW - Analytical methods

KW - Hydrogen peroxide

KW - Polysulfides

KW - Sulfide

KW - Superoxide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978494526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978494526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/ajpregu.00455.2015

DO - 10.1152/ajpregu.00455.2015

M3 - Article

C2 - 26764057

AN - SCOPUS:84978494526

VL - 310

SP - R549-R560

JO - American Journal of Physiology

JF - American Journal of Physiology

SN - 0193-1857

IS - 7

ER -