A clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate spray as compared with iodophor scrub for preoperative skin preparation

T. R. Brown, C. E. Ehrlich, F. B. Stehman, A. M. Golichowski, J. A. Madura, H. E. Eitzen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a prospective, randomized study, 737 patients who were evluated had the operative site prepared preoperatively by either a 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate spray or povidone-iodine scrub. The wound infection rate in these two comparable groups was not statistically different, although slightly favoring the spray technique (6.0 versus 8.1%). The spray technique challenges the conventional preoperative scrub and offers further advantages of increased effectiveness while also offering savings of time and expense.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)363-366
Number of pages4
JournalSurgery Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume158
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jun 1 1984

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate spray as compared with iodophor scrub for preoperative skin preparation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this