A clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate spray as compared with iodophor scrub for preoperative skin preparation

T. R. Brown, C. E. Ehrlich, Frederick Stehman, A. M. Golichowski, J. A. Madura, H. E. Eitzen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a prospective, randomized study, 737 patients who were evluated had the operative site prepared preoperatively by either a 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate spray or povidone-iodine scrub. The wound infection rate in these two comparable groups was not statistically different, although slightly favoring the spray technique (6.0 versus 8.1%). The spray technique challenges the conventional preoperative scrub and offers further advantages of increased effectiveness while also offering savings of time and expense.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-366
Number of pages4
JournalSurgery Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume158
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Iodophors
Povidone-Iodine
Wound Infection
Prospective Studies
Skin
chlorhexidine gluconate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

A clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate spray as compared with iodophor scrub for preoperative skin preparation. / Brown, T. R.; Ehrlich, C. E.; Stehman, Frederick; Golichowski, A. M.; Madura, J. A.; Eitzen, H. E.

In: Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 158, No. 4, 1984, p. 363-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, T. R. ; Ehrlich, C. E. ; Stehman, Frederick ; Golichowski, A. M. ; Madura, J. A. ; Eitzen, H. E. / A clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate spray as compared with iodophor scrub for preoperative skin preparation. In: Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1984 ; Vol. 158, No. 4. pp. 363-366.
@article{ca99a2ef46914066be9844260d948066,
title = "A clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate spray as compared with iodophor scrub for preoperative skin preparation",
abstract = "In a prospective, randomized study, 737 patients who were evluated had the operative site prepared preoperatively by either a 0.5{\%} chlorhexidine gluconate spray or povidone-iodine scrub. The wound infection rate in these two comparable groups was not statistically different, although slightly favoring the spray technique (6.0 versus 8.1{\%}). The spray technique challenges the conventional preoperative scrub and offers further advantages of increased effectiveness while also offering savings of time and expense.",
author = "Brown, {T. R.} and Ehrlich, {C. E.} and Frederick Stehman and Golichowski, {A. M.} and Madura, {J. A.} and Eitzen, {H. E.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "363--366",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate spray as compared with iodophor scrub for preoperative skin preparation

AU - Brown, T. R.

AU - Ehrlich, C. E.

AU - Stehman, Frederick

AU - Golichowski, A. M.

AU - Madura, J. A.

AU - Eitzen, H. E.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - In a prospective, randomized study, 737 patients who were evluated had the operative site prepared preoperatively by either a 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate spray or povidone-iodine scrub. The wound infection rate in these two comparable groups was not statistically different, although slightly favoring the spray technique (6.0 versus 8.1%). The spray technique challenges the conventional preoperative scrub and offers further advantages of increased effectiveness while also offering savings of time and expense.

AB - In a prospective, randomized study, 737 patients who were evluated had the operative site prepared preoperatively by either a 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate spray or povidone-iodine scrub. The wound infection rate in these two comparable groups was not statistically different, although slightly favoring the spray technique (6.0 versus 8.1%). The spray technique challenges the conventional preoperative scrub and offers further advantages of increased effectiveness while also offering savings of time and expense.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021328439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021328439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 158

SP - 363

EP - 366

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 4

ER -