A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations

Monica A. Fernandez, Carmen Y. Paez de Mendoza, Jeffrey Platt, John A. Levon, Suteera T. Hovijitra, Arthur Nimmo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: A precise transfer of the position and orientation of the antirotational mechanism of an implant to the working cast is particularly important to achieve optimal fit of the final restoration. This study evaluated and compared the accuracy of metal and plastic impression copings for use in a full-arch mandibular edentulous simulation with four implants. Materials and Methods: Metal and plastic impression transfer copings for two implant systems, Nobel Biocare™ Replace and Straumann SynOcta®, were assessed on a laboratory model to simulate clinical practice. The accuracy of producing stone casts using these plastic and metal impression transfer copings was measured against a standard prosthetic framework consisting of a cast gold bar. A total of 20 casts from the four combinations were obtained. The fit of the framework on the cast was tested by a noncontact surface profilometer, the Proscan 3D 2000 A, using the one-screw test. The effects of implant/system and impression/coping material on gap measurements were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The findings of this in vitro study were as follows: plastic copings demonstrated significantly larger average gaps than metal for Straumann (p = 0.001). Plastic and metal copings were not significantly different for Nobel (p = 0.302). Nobel had significantly larger average gaps than Straumann for metal copings (p = 0.003). Nobel had marginally smaller average gaps than Straumann (p = 0.096) for plastic copings. The system-by-screw location interaction was significant as well (p <0.001), indicating significant differences among the four screw locations, but the location differences were not the same for the two systems. A rank transformation of the data was necessary due to the nonnormal distribution of the gap measurements. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: The metal impression copings were more accurate than plastic copings when using the Straumann system, and there was no difference between metal and plastic copings for the Nobel Replace system. The system-by-screw location was not conclusive, showing no correlation within each system

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-376
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Plastics
Metals
Surgical Casts
Gold
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Gap
  • Implant
  • Impressions
  • Jig
  • Misfit
  • Prosthetic framework
  • Screw test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations. / Fernandez, Monica A.; Paez de Mendoza, Carmen Y.; Platt, Jeffrey; Levon, John A.; Hovijitra, Suteera T.; Nimmo, Arthur.

In: Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 22, No. 5, 07.2013, p. 367-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fernandez, Monica A. ; Paez de Mendoza, Carmen Y. ; Platt, Jeffrey ; Levon, John A. ; Hovijitra, Suteera T. ; Nimmo, Arthur. / A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations. In: Journal of Prosthodontics. 2013 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 367-376.
@article{99a72ca749ea4a4787978ad0e7dda021,
title = "A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations",
abstract = "Purpose: A precise transfer of the position and orientation of the antirotational mechanism of an implant to the working cast is particularly important to achieve optimal fit of the final restoration. This study evaluated and compared the accuracy of metal and plastic impression copings for use in a full-arch mandibular edentulous simulation with four implants. Materials and Methods: Metal and plastic impression transfer copings for two implant systems, Nobel Biocare™ Replace and Straumann SynOcta{\circledR}, were assessed on a laboratory model to simulate clinical practice. The accuracy of producing stone casts using these plastic and metal impression transfer copings was measured against a standard prosthetic framework consisting of a cast gold bar. A total of 20 casts from the four combinations were obtained. The fit of the framework on the cast was tested by a noncontact surface profilometer, the Proscan 3D 2000 A, using the one-screw test. The effects of implant/system and impression/coping material on gap measurements were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The findings of this in vitro study were as follows: plastic copings demonstrated significantly larger average gaps than metal for Straumann (p = 0.001). Plastic and metal copings were not significantly different for Nobel (p = 0.302). Nobel had significantly larger average gaps than Straumann for metal copings (p = 0.003). Nobel had marginally smaller average gaps than Straumann (p = 0.096) for plastic copings. The system-by-screw location interaction was significant as well (p <0.001), indicating significant differences among the four screw locations, but the location differences were not the same for the two systems. A rank transformation of the data was necessary due to the nonnormal distribution of the gap measurements. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: The metal impression copings were more accurate than plastic copings when using the Straumann system, and there was no difference between metal and plastic copings for the Nobel Replace system. The system-by-screw location was not conclusive, showing no correlation within each system",
keywords = "Gap, Implant, Impressions, Jig, Misfit, Prosthetic framework, Screw test",
author = "Fernandez, {Monica A.} and {Paez de Mendoza}, {Carmen Y.} and Jeffrey Platt and Levon, {John A.} and Hovijitra, {Suteera T.} and Arthur Nimmo",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/jopr.12015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "367--376",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "1059-941X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations

AU - Fernandez, Monica A.

AU - Paez de Mendoza, Carmen Y.

AU - Platt, Jeffrey

AU - Levon, John A.

AU - Hovijitra, Suteera T.

AU - Nimmo, Arthur

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Purpose: A precise transfer of the position and orientation of the antirotational mechanism of an implant to the working cast is particularly important to achieve optimal fit of the final restoration. This study evaluated and compared the accuracy of metal and plastic impression copings for use in a full-arch mandibular edentulous simulation with four implants. Materials and Methods: Metal and plastic impression transfer copings for two implant systems, Nobel Biocare™ Replace and Straumann SynOcta®, were assessed on a laboratory model to simulate clinical practice. The accuracy of producing stone casts using these plastic and metal impression transfer copings was measured against a standard prosthetic framework consisting of a cast gold bar. A total of 20 casts from the four combinations were obtained. The fit of the framework on the cast was tested by a noncontact surface profilometer, the Proscan 3D 2000 A, using the one-screw test. The effects of implant/system and impression/coping material on gap measurements were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The findings of this in vitro study were as follows: plastic copings demonstrated significantly larger average gaps than metal for Straumann (p = 0.001). Plastic and metal copings were not significantly different for Nobel (p = 0.302). Nobel had significantly larger average gaps than Straumann for metal copings (p = 0.003). Nobel had marginally smaller average gaps than Straumann (p = 0.096) for plastic copings. The system-by-screw location interaction was significant as well (p <0.001), indicating significant differences among the four screw locations, but the location differences were not the same for the two systems. A rank transformation of the data was necessary due to the nonnormal distribution of the gap measurements. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: The metal impression copings were more accurate than plastic copings when using the Straumann system, and there was no difference between metal and plastic copings for the Nobel Replace system. The system-by-screw location was not conclusive, showing no correlation within each system

AB - Purpose: A precise transfer of the position and orientation of the antirotational mechanism of an implant to the working cast is particularly important to achieve optimal fit of the final restoration. This study evaluated and compared the accuracy of metal and plastic impression copings for use in a full-arch mandibular edentulous simulation with four implants. Materials and Methods: Metal and plastic impression transfer copings for two implant systems, Nobel Biocare™ Replace and Straumann SynOcta®, were assessed on a laboratory model to simulate clinical practice. The accuracy of producing stone casts using these plastic and metal impression transfer copings was measured against a standard prosthetic framework consisting of a cast gold bar. A total of 20 casts from the four combinations were obtained. The fit of the framework on the cast was tested by a noncontact surface profilometer, the Proscan 3D 2000 A, using the one-screw test. The effects of implant/system and impression/coping material on gap measurements were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The findings of this in vitro study were as follows: plastic copings demonstrated significantly larger average gaps than metal for Straumann (p = 0.001). Plastic and metal copings were not significantly different for Nobel (p = 0.302). Nobel had significantly larger average gaps than Straumann for metal copings (p = 0.003). Nobel had marginally smaller average gaps than Straumann (p = 0.096) for plastic copings. The system-by-screw location interaction was significant as well (p <0.001), indicating significant differences among the four screw locations, but the location differences were not the same for the two systems. A rank transformation of the data was necessary due to the nonnormal distribution of the gap measurements. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: The metal impression copings were more accurate than plastic copings when using the Straumann system, and there was no difference between metal and plastic copings for the Nobel Replace system. The system-by-screw location was not conclusive, showing no correlation within each system

KW - Gap

KW - Implant

KW - Impressions

KW - Jig

KW - Misfit

KW - Prosthetic framework

KW - Screw test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880638661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880638661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopr.12015

DO - 10.1111/jopr.12015

M3 - Article

C2 - 23387412

AN - SCOPUS:84880638661

VL - 22

SP - 367

EP - 376

JO - Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 1059-941X

IS - 5

ER -