A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software

II. Soft tissue

Tamara Kublashvili, Katherine Kula, Alan Glaros, Patrick Hardman, Theodore Kula

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although digital radiographs and cephalometric analysis software are becoming increasingly popular in orthodontic offices, there is little information concerning their reliability of measurement of soft tissue or concerning comparison with conventional techniques. Our study shows good reliability of each imaging system (conventional and storage phosphor digital) and cephalometric analysis modality (manual tracing, Dolphin Imaging v. 7.0 and Vistadent Image Management system v. 8.0) with no statistical differences in reliability among the modalities. In the second part of our research comparing the means of the modalities using different subjects, there was no difference in mean Dolphin scanned values when compared with manual traced values whereas the other imaging modalities (Dolphin digital, Vistadent scanned, and Vistadent digital) were significantly different from the manual traced values. Dolphin digital was significantly different from Vistadent scanned and Vistadent digital, although there were no differences between Vistadent scanned and digital. In general, except for facial angle, these differences in modalities do not appear to be clinically significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-219
Number of pages8
JournalSeminars in Orthodontics
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cephalometry
Dolphins
Software
Orthodontics
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software : II. Soft tissue. / Kublashvili, Tamara; Kula, Katherine; Glaros, Alan; Hardman, Patrick; Kula, Theodore.

In: Seminars in Orthodontics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 212-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kublashvili, Tamara ; Kula, Katherine ; Glaros, Alan ; Hardman, Patrick ; Kula, Theodore. / A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software : II. Soft tissue. In: Seminars in Orthodontics. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 212-219.
@article{9162d294ab464954bf28995e8610dbef,
title = "A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: II. Soft tissue",
abstract = "Although digital radiographs and cephalometric analysis software are becoming increasingly popular in orthodontic offices, there is little information concerning their reliability of measurement of soft tissue or concerning comparison with conventional techniques. Our study shows good reliability of each imaging system (conventional and storage phosphor digital) and cephalometric analysis modality (manual tracing, Dolphin Imaging v. 7.0 and Vistadent Image Management system v. 8.0) with no statistical differences in reliability among the modalities. In the second part of our research comparing the means of the modalities using different subjects, there was no difference in mean Dolphin scanned values when compared with manual traced values whereas the other imaging modalities (Dolphin digital, Vistadent scanned, and Vistadent digital) were significantly different from the manual traced values. Dolphin digital was significantly different from Vistadent scanned and Vistadent digital, although there were no differences between Vistadent scanned and digital. In general, except for facial angle, these differences in modalities do not appear to be clinically significant.",
author = "Tamara Kublashvili and Katherine Kula and Alan Glaros and Patrick Hardman and Theodore Kula",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1053/j.sodo.2004.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "212--219",
journal = "Seminars in Orthodontics",
issn = "1073-8746",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software

T2 - II. Soft tissue

AU - Kublashvili, Tamara

AU - Kula, Katherine

AU - Glaros, Alan

AU - Hardman, Patrick

AU - Kula, Theodore

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Although digital radiographs and cephalometric analysis software are becoming increasingly popular in orthodontic offices, there is little information concerning their reliability of measurement of soft tissue or concerning comparison with conventional techniques. Our study shows good reliability of each imaging system (conventional and storage phosphor digital) and cephalometric analysis modality (manual tracing, Dolphin Imaging v. 7.0 and Vistadent Image Management system v. 8.0) with no statistical differences in reliability among the modalities. In the second part of our research comparing the means of the modalities using different subjects, there was no difference in mean Dolphin scanned values when compared with manual traced values whereas the other imaging modalities (Dolphin digital, Vistadent scanned, and Vistadent digital) were significantly different from the manual traced values. Dolphin digital was significantly different from Vistadent scanned and Vistadent digital, although there were no differences between Vistadent scanned and digital. In general, except for facial angle, these differences in modalities do not appear to be clinically significant.

AB - Although digital radiographs and cephalometric analysis software are becoming increasingly popular in orthodontic offices, there is little information concerning their reliability of measurement of soft tissue or concerning comparison with conventional techniques. Our study shows good reliability of each imaging system (conventional and storage phosphor digital) and cephalometric analysis modality (manual tracing, Dolphin Imaging v. 7.0 and Vistadent Image Management system v. 8.0) with no statistical differences in reliability among the modalities. In the second part of our research comparing the means of the modalities using different subjects, there was no difference in mean Dolphin scanned values when compared with manual traced values whereas the other imaging modalities (Dolphin digital, Vistadent scanned, and Vistadent digital) were significantly different from the manual traced values. Dolphin digital was significantly different from Vistadent scanned and Vistadent digital, although there were no differences between Vistadent scanned and digital. In general, except for facial angle, these differences in modalities do not appear to be clinically significant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11144303561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11144303561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.sodo.2004.05.005

DO - 10.1053/j.sodo.2004.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 212

EP - 219

JO - Seminars in Orthodontics

JF - Seminars in Orthodontics

SN - 1073-8746

IS - 3

ER -