A comparison of dental treatment utilization and costs by HMO members living in fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas

Gerardo Maupome, Christina M. Gullion, Dawn Peters, Sally Jo Little

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To compare dental treatment experiences and costs in members of a health maintenance organization (HMO) in areas with and without community water fluoridation. Methods: HMO members with continuous dental eligibility (January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1995) who resided in Oregon and Washington were identified using administrative databases. Fluoridation status was determined by geocoding subscriber address. Measures were utilization of dental procedures, fluoride dispensings, and associated costs. Costs were based on nonmember fees, adjusted to 1995 dollar values. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance, controlling for age and interactions. Results: About 85 percent of eligible members (n = 51,683) were classified as residing either in a fluoridated (n = 12,194) or nonfluoridated (n = 39,489) area. Mean age was 40.0 years; 52.3 percent were women. More than 92 percent of members had one or more dental visits. Community water fluoridation was associated with reduced total and restorative costs among members with one or more visits, but the magnitude and direction of the effect varied with locale and age and the effects were generally small. In two locales, the cost of restorations was higher in nonfluoridated areas in young people (age 58). In younger adults, the opposite effect was observed. The impact of fluoridation may be attenuated by higher use of preventive procedures, in particular supplemental fluorides, in the nonfluoridated areas. Conclusions: These results are particularly relevant to insured populations with established access to dental care. Differences in treatment costs (savings) associated with water fluoridation should be estimated and included in future cost-effectiveness analyses of community water fluoridation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-233
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Public Health Dentistry
Volume67
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Fluoridation
Health Maintenance Organizations
Health Care Costs
Tooth
Costs and Cost Analysis
Fluorides
Geographic Mapping
Fees and Charges
Dental Care
Cost Savings
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Young Adult
Databases
Population

Keywords

  • Cost
  • Dental care utilization
  • Dental restorations
  • Fluoridation
  • Health maintenance organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A comparison of dental treatment utilization and costs by HMO members living in fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas. / Maupome, Gerardo; Gullion, Christina M.; Peters, Dawn; Little, Sally Jo.

In: Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Vol. 67, No. 4, 09.2007, p. 224-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b75e1fa23f9d437782065475fef799a2,
title = "A comparison of dental treatment utilization and costs by HMO members living in fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas",
abstract = "Objectives: To compare dental treatment experiences and costs in members of a health maintenance organization (HMO) in areas with and without community water fluoridation. Methods: HMO members with continuous dental eligibility (January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1995) who resided in Oregon and Washington were identified using administrative databases. Fluoridation status was determined by geocoding subscriber address. Measures were utilization of dental procedures, fluoride dispensings, and associated costs. Costs were based on nonmember fees, adjusted to 1995 dollar values. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance, controlling for age and interactions. Results: About 85 percent of eligible members (n = 51,683) were classified as residing either in a fluoridated (n = 12,194) or nonfluoridated (n = 39,489) area. Mean age was 40.0 years; 52.3 percent were women. More than 92 percent of members had one or more dental visits. Community water fluoridation was associated with reduced total and restorative costs among members with one or more visits, but the magnitude and direction of the effect varied with locale and age and the effects were generally small. In two locales, the cost of restorations was higher in nonfluoridated areas in young people (age 58). In younger adults, the opposite effect was observed. The impact of fluoridation may be attenuated by higher use of preventive procedures, in particular supplemental fluorides, in the nonfluoridated areas. Conclusions: These results are particularly relevant to insured populations with established access to dental care. Differences in treatment costs (savings) associated with water fluoridation should be estimated and included in future cost-effectiveness analyses of community water fluoridation.",
keywords = "Cost, Dental care utilization, Dental restorations, Fluoridation, Health maintenance organizations",
author = "Gerardo Maupome and Gullion, {Christina M.} and Dawn Peters and Little, {Sally Jo}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00033.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "224--233",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Dentistry",
issn = "0022-4006",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of dental treatment utilization and costs by HMO members living in fluoridated and nonfluoridated areas

AU - Maupome, Gerardo

AU - Gullion, Christina M.

AU - Peters, Dawn

AU - Little, Sally Jo

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Objectives: To compare dental treatment experiences and costs in members of a health maintenance organization (HMO) in areas with and without community water fluoridation. Methods: HMO members with continuous dental eligibility (January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1995) who resided in Oregon and Washington were identified using administrative databases. Fluoridation status was determined by geocoding subscriber address. Measures were utilization of dental procedures, fluoride dispensings, and associated costs. Costs were based on nonmember fees, adjusted to 1995 dollar values. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance, controlling for age and interactions. Results: About 85 percent of eligible members (n = 51,683) were classified as residing either in a fluoridated (n = 12,194) or nonfluoridated (n = 39,489) area. Mean age was 40.0 years; 52.3 percent were women. More than 92 percent of members had one or more dental visits. Community water fluoridation was associated with reduced total and restorative costs among members with one or more visits, but the magnitude and direction of the effect varied with locale and age and the effects were generally small. In two locales, the cost of restorations was higher in nonfluoridated areas in young people (age 58). In younger adults, the opposite effect was observed. The impact of fluoridation may be attenuated by higher use of preventive procedures, in particular supplemental fluorides, in the nonfluoridated areas. Conclusions: These results are particularly relevant to insured populations with established access to dental care. Differences in treatment costs (savings) associated with water fluoridation should be estimated and included in future cost-effectiveness analyses of community water fluoridation.

AB - Objectives: To compare dental treatment experiences and costs in members of a health maintenance organization (HMO) in areas with and without community water fluoridation. Methods: HMO members with continuous dental eligibility (January 1, 1990 to December 31, 1995) who resided in Oregon and Washington were identified using administrative databases. Fluoridation status was determined by geocoding subscriber address. Measures were utilization of dental procedures, fluoride dispensings, and associated costs. Costs were based on nonmember fees, adjusted to 1995 dollar values. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance, controlling for age and interactions. Results: About 85 percent of eligible members (n = 51,683) were classified as residing either in a fluoridated (n = 12,194) or nonfluoridated (n = 39,489) area. Mean age was 40.0 years; 52.3 percent were women. More than 92 percent of members had one or more dental visits. Community water fluoridation was associated with reduced total and restorative costs among members with one or more visits, but the magnitude and direction of the effect varied with locale and age and the effects were generally small. In two locales, the cost of restorations was higher in nonfluoridated areas in young people (age 58). In younger adults, the opposite effect was observed. The impact of fluoridation may be attenuated by higher use of preventive procedures, in particular supplemental fluorides, in the nonfluoridated areas. Conclusions: These results are particularly relevant to insured populations with established access to dental care. Differences in treatment costs (savings) associated with water fluoridation should be estimated and included in future cost-effectiveness analyses of community water fluoridation.

KW - Cost

KW - Dental care utilization

KW - Dental restorations

KW - Fluoridation

KW - Health maintenance organizations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35948984770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35948984770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00033.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00033.x

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 224

EP - 233

JO - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

JF - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

SN - 0022-4006

IS - 4

ER -