A Comparison of outcomes for walk-in clinic patients who see interns and those who see staff physicians

Jeffrey L. Jackson, Kurt Kroenke, Louis Pangaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. To collect pilot data on the effect of interns' involvement on patient care outcomes. Method. Between January 1995 and August 1998, 750 patients at a walk-in clinic completed pre-visit questionnaires on symptom- related expectations and functional status. Three follow-up surveys (immediately after the visit, at two weeks, and at three months) assessed symptom outcomes, satisfaction, illness worry, and unmet expectations. Physicians were surveyed about their perceptions of the 'difficulty' of each patient encounter. Results. During the study period, 195 patients (26%) were seen by interns and 555 (74%) by staff physicians. The patient groups did not differ in illness worry, unmet expectations, or satisfaction immediately after the visit, at two weeks, or at three months. Patients seen by interns were more satisfied with the time they had spent with their clinicians (p = .007). Interns were more likely to experience their patient encounters as difficult. There was no difference in visit costs, subspecialty referrals, health utilization, or hospitalization rates. Conclusions. Patients who are seen by interns in an ambulatory clinic are similar to those who are seen by staff physicians in terms of post-visit satisfaction, residual expectations, symptom resolution, and functional status improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)718-720
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume74
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

physician
staff
Physicians
illness
hospitalization
patient care
utilization
questionnaire
costs
health
Patient Care
Hospitalization
Referral and Consultation
experience
Group
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

A Comparison of outcomes for walk-in clinic patients who see interns and those who see staff physicians. / Jackson, Jeffrey L.; Kroenke, Kurt; Pangaro, Louis.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 74, No. 6, 06.1999, p. 718-720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{338a8b48c0014a90bb08ed1ed366a39f,
title = "A Comparison of outcomes for walk-in clinic patients who see interns and those who see staff physicians",
abstract = "Purpose. To collect pilot data on the effect of interns' involvement on patient care outcomes. Method. Between January 1995 and August 1998, 750 patients at a walk-in clinic completed pre-visit questionnaires on symptom- related expectations and functional status. Three follow-up surveys (immediately after the visit, at two weeks, and at three months) assessed symptom outcomes, satisfaction, illness worry, and unmet expectations. Physicians were surveyed about their perceptions of the 'difficulty' of each patient encounter. Results. During the study period, 195 patients (26{\%}) were seen by interns and 555 (74{\%}) by staff physicians. The patient groups did not differ in illness worry, unmet expectations, or satisfaction immediately after the visit, at two weeks, or at three months. Patients seen by interns were more satisfied with the time they had spent with their clinicians (p = .007). Interns were more likely to experience their patient encounters as difficult. There was no difference in visit costs, subspecialty referrals, health utilization, or hospitalization rates. Conclusions. Patients who are seen by interns in an ambulatory clinic are similar to those who are seen by staff physicians in terms of post-visit satisfaction, residual expectations, symptom resolution, and functional status improvement.",
author = "Jackson, {Jeffrey L.} and Kurt Kroenke and Louis Pangaro",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "718--720",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of outcomes for walk-in clinic patients who see interns and those who see staff physicians

AU - Jackson, Jeffrey L.

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

AU - Pangaro, Louis

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - Purpose. To collect pilot data on the effect of interns' involvement on patient care outcomes. Method. Between January 1995 and August 1998, 750 patients at a walk-in clinic completed pre-visit questionnaires on symptom- related expectations and functional status. Three follow-up surveys (immediately after the visit, at two weeks, and at three months) assessed symptom outcomes, satisfaction, illness worry, and unmet expectations. Physicians were surveyed about their perceptions of the 'difficulty' of each patient encounter. Results. During the study period, 195 patients (26%) were seen by interns and 555 (74%) by staff physicians. The patient groups did not differ in illness worry, unmet expectations, or satisfaction immediately after the visit, at two weeks, or at three months. Patients seen by interns were more satisfied with the time they had spent with their clinicians (p = .007). Interns were more likely to experience their patient encounters as difficult. There was no difference in visit costs, subspecialty referrals, health utilization, or hospitalization rates. Conclusions. Patients who are seen by interns in an ambulatory clinic are similar to those who are seen by staff physicians in terms of post-visit satisfaction, residual expectations, symptom resolution, and functional status improvement.

AB - Purpose. To collect pilot data on the effect of interns' involvement on patient care outcomes. Method. Between January 1995 and August 1998, 750 patients at a walk-in clinic completed pre-visit questionnaires on symptom- related expectations and functional status. Three follow-up surveys (immediately after the visit, at two weeks, and at three months) assessed symptom outcomes, satisfaction, illness worry, and unmet expectations. Physicians were surveyed about their perceptions of the 'difficulty' of each patient encounter. Results. During the study period, 195 patients (26%) were seen by interns and 555 (74%) by staff physicians. The patient groups did not differ in illness worry, unmet expectations, or satisfaction immediately after the visit, at two weeks, or at three months. Patients seen by interns were more satisfied with the time they had spent with their clinicians (p = .007). Interns were more likely to experience their patient encounters as difficult. There was no difference in visit costs, subspecialty referrals, health utilization, or hospitalization rates. Conclusions. Patients who are seen by interns in an ambulatory clinic are similar to those who are seen by staff physicians in terms of post-visit satisfaction, residual expectations, symptom resolution, and functional status improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033053429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033053429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10386103

AN - SCOPUS:0033053429

VL - 74

SP - 718

EP - 720

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 6

ER -