A comparison of the interpretation of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms

D. S. Segar, D. Skolnick, Stephen Sawada, G. Fitch, D. Wagner, D. Adams, Harvey Feigenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conventional echocardiograms are typically recorded on videotape and later reviewed and interpreted by a physician. Although videotape recording is an excellent medium for this purpose, it does have several disadvantages, which may be overcome by digital storage. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms. Echocardiographic examinations (n = 110) were recorded simultaneously on videotape and were digitized with a commercially available frame grabber system. Images were transmitted by an Ethernet link to the network-based computer system and compressed with a nondestructive compression algorithm. Images were reviewed on a personal computer. Images were interpreted by 3 observers, and differences in interpretation were documented. There were 274 findings in 110 patients. Exact agreement in interpretation was found in 83%. A major discrepancy occurred in 2%, and a minor discrepancy occurred in 15%. Most discrepancies occurred in the setting of valvular heart disease. When compared with a consensus interpretation, no significant difference was seen in the number of errors between the digital and videotape interpretation. We conclude that the interpretation of a properly recorded digitized echocardiographic examination yields interpretations equivalent to those of videotape recordings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)714-719
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Videotape Recording
Heart Valve Diseases
Computer Systems
Microcomputers
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

A comparison of the interpretation of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms. / Segar, D. S.; Skolnick, D.; Sawada, Stephen; Fitch, G.; Wagner, D.; Adams, D.; Feigenbaum, Harvey.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Vol. 12, No. 9, 1999, p. 714-719.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa53b867f6694ac4961808bab84f5201,
title = "A comparison of the interpretation of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms",
abstract = "Conventional echocardiograms are typically recorded on videotape and later reviewed and interpreted by a physician. Although videotape recording is an excellent medium for this purpose, it does have several disadvantages, which may be overcome by digital storage. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms. Echocardiographic examinations (n = 110) were recorded simultaneously on videotape and were digitized with a commercially available frame grabber system. Images were transmitted by an Ethernet link to the network-based computer system and compressed with a nondestructive compression algorithm. Images were reviewed on a personal computer. Images were interpreted by 3 observers, and differences in interpretation were documented. There were 274 findings in 110 patients. Exact agreement in interpretation was found in 83{\%}. A major discrepancy occurred in 2{\%}, and a minor discrepancy occurred in 15{\%}. Most discrepancies occurred in the setting of valvular heart disease. When compared with a consensus interpretation, no significant difference was seen in the number of errors between the digital and videotape interpretation. We conclude that the interpretation of a properly recorded digitized echocardiographic examination yields interpretations equivalent to those of videotape recordings.",
author = "Segar, {D. S.} and D. Skolnick and Stephen Sawada and G. Fitch and D. Wagner and D. Adams and Harvey Feigenbaum",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70021-0",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "714--719",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the interpretation of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms

AU - Segar, D. S.

AU - Skolnick, D.

AU - Sawada, Stephen

AU - Fitch, G.

AU - Wagner, D.

AU - Adams, D.

AU - Feigenbaum, Harvey

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Conventional echocardiograms are typically recorded on videotape and later reviewed and interpreted by a physician. Although videotape recording is an excellent medium for this purpose, it does have several disadvantages, which may be overcome by digital storage. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms. Echocardiographic examinations (n = 110) were recorded simultaneously on videotape and were digitized with a commercially available frame grabber system. Images were transmitted by an Ethernet link to the network-based computer system and compressed with a nondestructive compression algorithm. Images were reviewed on a personal computer. Images were interpreted by 3 observers, and differences in interpretation were documented. There were 274 findings in 110 patients. Exact agreement in interpretation was found in 83%. A major discrepancy occurred in 2%, and a minor discrepancy occurred in 15%. Most discrepancies occurred in the setting of valvular heart disease. When compared with a consensus interpretation, no significant difference was seen in the number of errors between the digital and videotape interpretation. We conclude that the interpretation of a properly recorded digitized echocardiographic examination yields interpretations equivalent to those of videotape recordings.

AB - Conventional echocardiograms are typically recorded on videotape and later reviewed and interpreted by a physician. Although videotape recording is an excellent medium for this purpose, it does have several disadvantages, which may be overcome by digital storage. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of digitized and videotape recorded echocardiograms. Echocardiographic examinations (n = 110) were recorded simultaneously on videotape and were digitized with a commercially available frame grabber system. Images were transmitted by an Ethernet link to the network-based computer system and compressed with a nondestructive compression algorithm. Images were reviewed on a personal computer. Images were interpreted by 3 observers, and differences in interpretation were documented. There were 274 findings in 110 patients. Exact agreement in interpretation was found in 83%. A major discrepancy occurred in 2%, and a minor discrepancy occurred in 15%. Most discrepancies occurred in the setting of valvular heart disease. When compared with a consensus interpretation, no significant difference was seen in the number of errors between the digital and videotape interpretation. We conclude that the interpretation of a properly recorded digitized echocardiographic examination yields interpretations equivalent to those of videotape recordings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032847043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032847043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70021-0

DO - 10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70021-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 10477415

AN - SCOPUS:0032847043

VL - 12

SP - 714

EP - 719

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

IS - 9

ER -