A comparison of theoretical and statistically derived indices for predicting cognitive decline

Holly Wilhalme, Naira Goukasian, Fransia De Leon, Angie He, Kristy S. Hwang, Ellen Woo, David Elashoff, Yan Zhou, John M. Ringman, Liana G. Apostolova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Both theoretical and statistically derived approaches have been used in research settings for predicting cognitive decline. Methods Fifty-eight cognitively normal (NC) and 71 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects completed a comprehensive cognitive battery for up to 5 years of follow-up. Composite indices of cognitive function were derived using a classic theoretical approach and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Cognitive variables comprising each factor were averaged to form the EFA composite indices. Logistic regression was used to investigate whether these cognitive composites can reliably predict cognitive outcomes. Results Neither method predicted decline in NC. The theoretical memory, executive, attention, and language composites and the EFA-derived “attention/executive” and “verbal memory” composites were significant predictors of decline in MCI. The best models achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 in MCI. Conclusions The theoretical and the statistically derived cognitive composite approaches are useful in predicting decline in MCI but not in NC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-181
Number of pages11
JournalAlzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Cognition
Area Under Curve
Language
Logistic Models
Cognitive Dysfunction
Research

Keywords

  • AD
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Cognitive decline
  • Conversion
  • Executive decline
  • Factor analysis
  • MCI
  • Memory decline
  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Neuropsychological test
  • Prognosis
  • Progression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A comparison of theoretical and statistically derived indices for predicting cognitive decline. / Wilhalme, Holly; Goukasian, Naira; De Leon, Fransia; He, Angie; Hwang, Kristy S.; Woo, Ellen; Elashoff, David; Zhou, Yan; Ringman, John M.; Apostolova, Liana G.

In: Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring, Vol. 6, 01.01.2017, p. 171-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilhalme, Holly ; Goukasian, Naira ; De Leon, Fransia ; He, Angie ; Hwang, Kristy S. ; Woo, Ellen ; Elashoff, David ; Zhou, Yan ; Ringman, John M. ; Apostolova, Liana G. / A comparison of theoretical and statistically derived indices for predicting cognitive decline. In: Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring. 2017 ; Vol. 6. pp. 171-181.
@article{2fe59b2aa73b410394cc7b38277753d6,
title = "A comparison of theoretical and statistically derived indices for predicting cognitive decline",
abstract = "Introduction Both theoretical and statistically derived approaches have been used in research settings for predicting cognitive decline. Methods Fifty-eight cognitively normal (NC) and 71 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects completed a comprehensive cognitive battery for up to 5 years of follow-up. Composite indices of cognitive function were derived using a classic theoretical approach and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Cognitive variables comprising each factor were averaged to form the EFA composite indices. Logistic regression was used to investigate whether these cognitive composites can reliably predict cognitive outcomes. Results Neither method predicted decline in NC. The theoretical memory, executive, attention, and language composites and the EFA-derived “attention/executive” and “verbal memory” composites were significant predictors of decline in MCI. The best models achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 in MCI. Conclusions The theoretical and the statistically derived cognitive composite approaches are useful in predicting decline in MCI but not in NC.",
keywords = "AD, Alzheimer's disease, Cognitive decline, Conversion, Executive decline, Factor analysis, MCI, Memory decline, Mild cognitive impairment, Neuropsychological test, Prognosis, Progression",
author = "Holly Wilhalme and Naira Goukasian and {De Leon}, Fransia and Angie He and Hwang, {Kristy S.} and Ellen Woo and David Elashoff and Yan Zhou and Ringman, {John M.} and Apostolova, {Liana G.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dadm.2016.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "171--181",
journal = "Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring",
issn = "2352-8729",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of theoretical and statistically derived indices for predicting cognitive decline

AU - Wilhalme, Holly

AU - Goukasian, Naira

AU - De Leon, Fransia

AU - He, Angie

AU - Hwang, Kristy S.

AU - Woo, Ellen

AU - Elashoff, David

AU - Zhou, Yan

AU - Ringman, John M.

AU - Apostolova, Liana G.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Introduction Both theoretical and statistically derived approaches have been used in research settings for predicting cognitive decline. Methods Fifty-eight cognitively normal (NC) and 71 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects completed a comprehensive cognitive battery for up to 5 years of follow-up. Composite indices of cognitive function were derived using a classic theoretical approach and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Cognitive variables comprising each factor were averaged to form the EFA composite indices. Logistic regression was used to investigate whether these cognitive composites can reliably predict cognitive outcomes. Results Neither method predicted decline in NC. The theoretical memory, executive, attention, and language composites and the EFA-derived “attention/executive” and “verbal memory” composites were significant predictors of decline in MCI. The best models achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 in MCI. Conclusions The theoretical and the statistically derived cognitive composite approaches are useful in predicting decline in MCI but not in NC.

AB - Introduction Both theoretical and statistically derived approaches have been used in research settings for predicting cognitive decline. Methods Fifty-eight cognitively normal (NC) and 71 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects completed a comprehensive cognitive battery for up to 5 years of follow-up. Composite indices of cognitive function were derived using a classic theoretical approach and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Cognitive variables comprising each factor were averaged to form the EFA composite indices. Logistic regression was used to investigate whether these cognitive composites can reliably predict cognitive outcomes. Results Neither method predicted decline in NC. The theoretical memory, executive, attention, and language composites and the EFA-derived “attention/executive” and “verbal memory” composites were significant predictors of decline in MCI. The best models achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 in MCI. Conclusions The theoretical and the statistically derived cognitive composite approaches are useful in predicting decline in MCI but not in NC.

KW - AD

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Cognitive decline

KW - Conversion

KW - Executive decline

KW - Factor analysis

KW - MCI

KW - Memory decline

KW - Mild cognitive impairment

KW - Neuropsychological test

KW - Prognosis

KW - Progression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013869583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013869583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85013869583

VL - 6

SP - 171

EP - 181

JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring

JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring

SN - 2352-8729

ER -