A comparison of traditional and Rasch cut points for assessing clinically important change in health-related quality of life among patients with asthma

Stacie M. Metz, Kathleen W. Wyrwich, Ajit N. Babu, Kurt Kroenke, William M. Tierney, Fredric D. Wolinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patient-perceived change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains has often been classified using a 15-point patient transition rating scale. However, traditional change levels of trivial ( - 1, 0, or 1), minimal (2, 3 or - 2, - 3), moderate (4, 5 or - 4, - 5) and large (6, 7 or - 6, - 7) on this scale have been arbitrarily defined and originally assumed that change related to an improvement was the same as that for a decline. Objective: To compare traditional and Rasch partial credit model-derived cut points and the mean changes for each change categorization when assessing clinically important change in asthma-specific HRQoL. Methods: Our sample included 396 asthmatic outpatients who completed bimonthly telephone interviews on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and transition rating items over 1 year of participation. We employed item response theory in a novel approach to identify cut points on domain-specific HRQoL change data and transition ratings. After determining natural cut points for minimal, moderate, and large differences on the transition rating anchor, we calculated mean changes under change categorizations for both improvements and declines for the two transition rating classification approaches. Results: Although traditional and Rasch categorizations for small, moderate, and large changes slightly differed and displayed a lack of symmetry between improvements and declines, nearly all mean changes between classification approaches were comparable. Conclusions: In this study, traditional transition rating cut points remain suitable to assess HRQoL clinical significance in outpatients with asthma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1639-1649
Number of pages11
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Asthma
Quality of Life
Outpatients
Patient Transfer
Interviews

Keywords

  • HRQOL
  • Item response theory
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Outcomes research
  • Patient centered care
  • Rasch modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

A comparison of traditional and Rasch cut points for assessing clinically important change in health-related quality of life among patients with asthma. / Metz, Stacie M.; Wyrwich, Kathleen W.; Babu, Ajit N.; Kroenke, Kurt; Tierney, William M.; Wolinsky, Fredric D.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 15, No. 10, 12.2006, p. 1639-1649.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Metz, Stacie M. ; Wyrwich, Kathleen W. ; Babu, Ajit N. ; Kroenke, Kurt ; Tierney, William M. ; Wolinsky, Fredric D. / A comparison of traditional and Rasch cut points for assessing clinically important change in health-related quality of life among patients with asthma. In: Quality of Life Research. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 10. pp. 1639-1649.
@article{2b54d0c56e38404baa2ba878aa605e9f,
title = "A comparison of traditional and Rasch cut points for assessing clinically important change in health-related quality of life among patients with asthma",
abstract = "Background: Patient-perceived change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains has often been classified using a 15-point patient transition rating scale. However, traditional change levels of trivial ( - 1, 0, or 1), minimal (2, 3 or - 2, - 3), moderate (4, 5 or - 4, - 5) and large (6, 7 or - 6, - 7) on this scale have been arbitrarily defined and originally assumed that change related to an improvement was the same as that for a decline. Objective: To compare traditional and Rasch partial credit model-derived cut points and the mean changes for each change categorization when assessing clinically important change in asthma-specific HRQoL. Methods: Our sample included 396 asthmatic outpatients who completed bimonthly telephone interviews on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and transition rating items over 1 year of participation. We employed item response theory in a novel approach to identify cut points on domain-specific HRQoL change data and transition ratings. After determining natural cut points for minimal, moderate, and large differences on the transition rating anchor, we calculated mean changes under change categorizations for both improvements and declines for the two transition rating classification approaches. Results: Although traditional and Rasch categorizations for small, moderate, and large changes slightly differed and displayed a lack of symmetry between improvements and declines, nearly all mean changes between classification approaches were comparable. Conclusions: In this study, traditional transition rating cut points remain suitable to assess HRQoL clinical significance in outpatients with asthma.",
keywords = "HRQOL, Item response theory, Medical Decision Making, Outcomes research, Patient centered care, Rasch modeling",
author = "Metz, {Stacie M.} and Wyrwich, {Kathleen W.} and Babu, {Ajit N.} and Kurt Kroenke and Tierney, {William M.} and Wolinsky, {Fredric D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-006-0036-6",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1639--1649",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of traditional and Rasch cut points for assessing clinically important change in health-related quality of life among patients with asthma

AU - Metz, Stacie M.

AU - Wyrwich, Kathleen W.

AU - Babu, Ajit N.

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

AU - Tierney, William M.

AU - Wolinsky, Fredric D.

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Background: Patient-perceived change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains has often been classified using a 15-point patient transition rating scale. However, traditional change levels of trivial ( - 1, 0, or 1), minimal (2, 3 or - 2, - 3), moderate (4, 5 or - 4, - 5) and large (6, 7 or - 6, - 7) on this scale have been arbitrarily defined and originally assumed that change related to an improvement was the same as that for a decline. Objective: To compare traditional and Rasch partial credit model-derived cut points and the mean changes for each change categorization when assessing clinically important change in asthma-specific HRQoL. Methods: Our sample included 396 asthmatic outpatients who completed bimonthly telephone interviews on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and transition rating items over 1 year of participation. We employed item response theory in a novel approach to identify cut points on domain-specific HRQoL change data and transition ratings. After determining natural cut points for minimal, moderate, and large differences on the transition rating anchor, we calculated mean changes under change categorizations for both improvements and declines for the two transition rating classification approaches. Results: Although traditional and Rasch categorizations for small, moderate, and large changes slightly differed and displayed a lack of symmetry between improvements and declines, nearly all mean changes between classification approaches were comparable. Conclusions: In this study, traditional transition rating cut points remain suitable to assess HRQoL clinical significance in outpatients with asthma.

AB - Background: Patient-perceived change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains has often been classified using a 15-point patient transition rating scale. However, traditional change levels of trivial ( - 1, 0, or 1), minimal (2, 3 or - 2, - 3), moderate (4, 5 or - 4, - 5) and large (6, 7 or - 6, - 7) on this scale have been arbitrarily defined and originally assumed that change related to an improvement was the same as that for a decline. Objective: To compare traditional and Rasch partial credit model-derived cut points and the mean changes for each change categorization when assessing clinically important change in asthma-specific HRQoL. Methods: Our sample included 396 asthmatic outpatients who completed bimonthly telephone interviews on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and transition rating items over 1 year of participation. We employed item response theory in a novel approach to identify cut points on domain-specific HRQoL change data and transition ratings. After determining natural cut points for minimal, moderate, and large differences on the transition rating anchor, we calculated mean changes under change categorizations for both improvements and declines for the two transition rating classification approaches. Results: Although traditional and Rasch categorizations for small, moderate, and large changes slightly differed and displayed a lack of symmetry between improvements and declines, nearly all mean changes between classification approaches were comparable. Conclusions: In this study, traditional transition rating cut points remain suitable to assess HRQoL clinical significance in outpatients with asthma.

KW - HRQOL

KW - Item response theory

KW - Medical Decision Making

KW - Outcomes research

KW - Patient centered care

KW - Rasch modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751429481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751429481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-006-0036-6

DO - 10.1007/s11136-006-0036-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 17036255

AN - SCOPUS:33751429481

VL - 15

SP - 1639

EP - 1649

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 10

ER -