A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients

Paul Dexter, Susan Perkins, J. Marc Overhage, Kati Maharry, Richard B. Kohler, Clement J. McDonald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

380 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although they are effective in outpatient settings, computerized reminders have not been proved to increase preventive care in inpatient settings. Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine the effects of computerized reminders on the rates at which four preventive therapies were ordered for inpatients. During an 18-month study period, a computerized system processed on-line information for all 6371 patients admitted to a general-medicine service (for a total of 10,065 hospitalizations), generating preventive care reminders as appropriate. Physicians who were in the intervention group viewed these reminders when they were using a computerized order-entry system for inpatients. Results: The reminder system identified 3416 patients (53.6 percent) as eligible for preventive measures that had not been ordered by the admitting physician. For patients with at least one indication, computerized reminders resulted in higher adjusted ordering rates for pneumococcal vaccination (35.8 percent of the patients in the intervention group vs. 0.8 percent of those in the control group, P<0.001), influenza vaccination (51.4 percent vs. 1.0 percent, P< 0.001), prophylactic heparin (32.2 percent vs. 18.9 percent, P<0.001), and prophylactic aspirin at discharge (36.4 percent vs. 27.6 percent, P<0.001). Conclusions: A majority of hospitalized patients in this study were eligible for preventive measures, and computerized reminders significantly increased the rate of delivery of such therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)965-970
Number of pages6
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume345
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 27 2001

Fingerprint

Reminder Systems
Preventive Medicine
Inpatients
Vaccination
Online Systems
Physicians
Human Influenza
Aspirin
Heparin
Hospitalization
Outpatients
Randomized Controlled Trials
Medicine
Control Groups
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. / Dexter, Paul; Perkins, Susan; Marc Overhage, J.; Maharry, Kati; Kohler, Richard B.; McDonald, Clement J.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 345, No. 13, 27.09.2001, p. 965-970.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dexter, Paul ; Perkins, Susan ; Marc Overhage, J. ; Maharry, Kati ; Kohler, Richard B. ; McDonald, Clement J. / A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 2001 ; Vol. 345, No. 13. pp. 965-970.
@article{a6cd602d820c4999a9bbd7302ba73c56,
title = "A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients",
abstract = "Background: Although they are effective in outpatient settings, computerized reminders have not been proved to increase preventive care in inpatient settings. Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine the effects of computerized reminders on the rates at which four preventive therapies were ordered for inpatients. During an 18-month study period, a computerized system processed on-line information for all 6371 patients admitted to a general-medicine service (for a total of 10,065 hospitalizations), generating preventive care reminders as appropriate. Physicians who were in the intervention group viewed these reminders when they were using a computerized order-entry system for inpatients. Results: The reminder system identified 3416 patients (53.6 percent) as eligible for preventive measures that had not been ordered by the admitting physician. For patients with at least one indication, computerized reminders resulted in higher adjusted ordering rates for pneumococcal vaccination (35.8 percent of the patients in the intervention group vs. 0.8 percent of those in the control group, P<0.001), influenza vaccination (51.4 percent vs. 1.0 percent, P< 0.001), prophylactic heparin (32.2 percent vs. 18.9 percent, P<0.001), and prophylactic aspirin at discharge (36.4 percent vs. 27.6 percent, P<0.001). Conclusions: A majority of hospitalized patients in this study were eligible for preventive measures, and computerized reminders significantly increased the rate of delivery of such therapies.",
author = "Paul Dexter and Susan Perkins and {Marc Overhage}, J. and Kati Maharry and Kohler, {Richard B.} and McDonald, {Clement J.}",
year = "2001",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1056/NEJMsa010181",
language = "English",
volume = "345",
pages = "965--970",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0028-4793",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients

AU - Dexter, Paul

AU - Perkins, Susan

AU - Marc Overhage, J.

AU - Maharry, Kati

AU - Kohler, Richard B.

AU - McDonald, Clement J.

PY - 2001/9/27

Y1 - 2001/9/27

N2 - Background: Although they are effective in outpatient settings, computerized reminders have not been proved to increase preventive care in inpatient settings. Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine the effects of computerized reminders on the rates at which four preventive therapies were ordered for inpatients. During an 18-month study period, a computerized system processed on-line information for all 6371 patients admitted to a general-medicine service (for a total of 10,065 hospitalizations), generating preventive care reminders as appropriate. Physicians who were in the intervention group viewed these reminders when they were using a computerized order-entry system for inpatients. Results: The reminder system identified 3416 patients (53.6 percent) as eligible for preventive measures that had not been ordered by the admitting physician. For patients with at least one indication, computerized reminders resulted in higher adjusted ordering rates for pneumococcal vaccination (35.8 percent of the patients in the intervention group vs. 0.8 percent of those in the control group, P<0.001), influenza vaccination (51.4 percent vs. 1.0 percent, P< 0.001), prophylactic heparin (32.2 percent vs. 18.9 percent, P<0.001), and prophylactic aspirin at discharge (36.4 percent vs. 27.6 percent, P<0.001). Conclusions: A majority of hospitalized patients in this study were eligible for preventive measures, and computerized reminders significantly increased the rate of delivery of such therapies.

AB - Background: Although they are effective in outpatient settings, computerized reminders have not been proved to increase preventive care in inpatient settings. Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine the effects of computerized reminders on the rates at which four preventive therapies were ordered for inpatients. During an 18-month study period, a computerized system processed on-line information for all 6371 patients admitted to a general-medicine service (for a total of 10,065 hospitalizations), generating preventive care reminders as appropriate. Physicians who were in the intervention group viewed these reminders when they were using a computerized order-entry system for inpatients. Results: The reminder system identified 3416 patients (53.6 percent) as eligible for preventive measures that had not been ordered by the admitting physician. For patients with at least one indication, computerized reminders resulted in higher adjusted ordering rates for pneumococcal vaccination (35.8 percent of the patients in the intervention group vs. 0.8 percent of those in the control group, P<0.001), influenza vaccination (51.4 percent vs. 1.0 percent, P< 0.001), prophylactic heparin (32.2 percent vs. 18.9 percent, P<0.001), and prophylactic aspirin at discharge (36.4 percent vs. 27.6 percent, P<0.001). Conclusions: A majority of hospitalized patients in this study were eligible for preventive measures, and computerized reminders significantly increased the rate of delivery of such therapies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035960125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035960125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1056/NEJMsa010181

DO - 10.1056/NEJMsa010181

M3 - Article

VL - 345

SP - 965

EP - 970

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 0028-4793

IS - 13

ER -