A Content Analysis of Protective Factors Within States' Antibullying Laws

Lori M. Weaver, James R. Brown, Daniel B. Weddle, Matthew Aalsma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

State lawmakers have responded to school bullying by crafting antibullying legislation. By July 2011, 47 states enacted such laws, though varied widely in content and scope. This study systematically evaluated each state's antibullying legislation by focusing on the inclusion of individual, parental, and systemic protective factors through analysis of 27 researcher-developed criteria. Although protective factors were often mentioned, overall states' antibullying language lacked clarity. The ambiguity in language and gaps of protection that exist are concerning regarding potential bullying behavior on individual, familial, and school system levels. Results of this content analysis identified areas for improvement in antibullying legislation. For instance, although the majority of states had antibullying legislation, clear guidelines for school officials were often lacking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-173
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of School Violence
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

state law
content analysis
legislation
exclusion
language
school system
school
inclusion
Law

Keywords

  • antibullying laws
  • antibullying legislation
  • protective factors
  • school bullying

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cite this

A Content Analysis of Protective Factors Within States' Antibullying Laws. / Weaver, Lori M.; Brown, James R.; Weddle, Daniel B.; Aalsma, Matthew.

In: Journal of School Violence, Vol. 12, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 156-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weaver, Lori M. ; Brown, James R. ; Weddle, Daniel B. ; Aalsma, Matthew. / A Content Analysis of Protective Factors Within States' Antibullying Laws. In: Journal of School Violence. 2013 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 156-173.
@article{121167acec9e4094b028c7184189dc3a,
title = "A Content Analysis of Protective Factors Within States' Antibullying Laws",
abstract = "State lawmakers have responded to school bullying by crafting antibullying legislation. By July 2011, 47 states enacted such laws, though varied widely in content and scope. This study systematically evaluated each state's antibullying legislation by focusing on the inclusion of individual, parental, and systemic protective factors through analysis of 27 researcher-developed criteria. Although protective factors were often mentioned, overall states' antibullying language lacked clarity. The ambiguity in language and gaps of protection that exist are concerning regarding potential bullying behavior on individual, familial, and school system levels. Results of this content analysis identified areas for improvement in antibullying legislation. For instance, although the majority of states had antibullying legislation, clear guidelines for school officials were often lacking.",
keywords = "antibullying laws, antibullying legislation, protective factors, school bullying",
author = "Weaver, {Lori M.} and Brown, {James R.} and Weddle, {Daniel B.} and Matthew Aalsma",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/15388220.2012.751537",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "156--173",
journal = "Journal of School Violence",
issn = "1538-8220",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Content Analysis of Protective Factors Within States' Antibullying Laws

AU - Weaver, Lori M.

AU - Brown, James R.

AU - Weddle, Daniel B.

AU - Aalsma, Matthew

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - State lawmakers have responded to school bullying by crafting antibullying legislation. By July 2011, 47 states enacted such laws, though varied widely in content and scope. This study systematically evaluated each state's antibullying legislation by focusing on the inclusion of individual, parental, and systemic protective factors through analysis of 27 researcher-developed criteria. Although protective factors were often mentioned, overall states' antibullying language lacked clarity. The ambiguity in language and gaps of protection that exist are concerning regarding potential bullying behavior on individual, familial, and school system levels. Results of this content analysis identified areas for improvement in antibullying legislation. For instance, although the majority of states had antibullying legislation, clear guidelines for school officials were often lacking.

AB - State lawmakers have responded to school bullying by crafting antibullying legislation. By July 2011, 47 states enacted such laws, though varied widely in content and scope. This study systematically evaluated each state's antibullying legislation by focusing on the inclusion of individual, parental, and systemic protective factors through analysis of 27 researcher-developed criteria. Although protective factors were often mentioned, overall states' antibullying language lacked clarity. The ambiguity in language and gaps of protection that exist are concerning regarding potential bullying behavior on individual, familial, and school system levels. Results of this content analysis identified areas for improvement in antibullying legislation. For instance, although the majority of states had antibullying legislation, clear guidelines for school officials were often lacking.

KW - antibullying laws

KW - antibullying legislation

KW - protective factors

KW - school bullying

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875992729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875992729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15388220.2012.751537

DO - 10.1080/15388220.2012.751537

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 156

EP - 173

JO - Journal of School Violence

JF - Journal of School Violence

SN - 1538-8220

IS - 2

ER -