A cross-sectional study of self-rated health among older adults: A comparison of China and the United States

Dongjuan Xu, Gregory Arling, Kefang Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: We used nationally representative samples of China and the US older population to investigate (1) whether factors influencing self-rated health among older Chinese were similar to those among older Americans; and (2) whether there was a significant cross-national difference in self-rated health between China and the USA after controlling those available influencing factors. Design: A cross-sectional study. Data came from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study and China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted from 2014 to 2015. Participants: Our final sample size totaled 8905 older adults in the USA and 4442 older adults in China. Outcome The response variable was self-rated health. Ordered logistic regression models were conducted to investigate factors influencing self-rated health among older adults. Results: More than three-fourths (78%) of older adults in China reported fair or poor health status, while almost 74% of older adults in the USA reported excellent, very good or good health status. In the overall ordered logistic regression model, when controlling statistically for sociodemographics, family structure, functional limitations, cognition, chronic conditions, mental health and health-related behaviours, the Chinese survey respondents were much more likely to rate their health as being poorer than the US respondents. The odds of having better versus poorer health was almost five times greater in American older adults than those in China (OR=4.88, 95% CI 4.06 to 5.86). Older adults in China living alone rated their health better than those living with spouse/partner; however, no significant difference was found between these two living arrangements in older Americans. In contrast, older adults in the USA living with others rated their health worse compared with those living with spouse/partner. In addition, older adults who had more activities of daily living limitations, poorer self-reported memory, worse mental health and chronic health conditions had lower self-rated health in both countries. Conclusions: We found a striking difference in self-rated health between China and the USA even after controlling for measures of disease, functional status and other influencing factors. Relative to their American counterparts, Chinese elders were much more likely to report worse health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere027895
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health
Logistic Models
Retirement
Spouses
Health Status
Mental Health
Activities of Daily Living
Sample Size
Cognition
Longitudinal Studies

Keywords

  • China
  • living arrangement
  • older adults
  • self-rated health
  • the United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A cross-sectional study of self-rated health among older adults : A comparison of China and the United States. / Xu, Dongjuan; Arling, Gregory; Wang, Kefang.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 7, e027895, 01.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d66a19a61ca04138868777b043c3dce8,
title = "A cross-sectional study of self-rated health among older adults: A comparison of China and the United States",
abstract = "Objectives: We used nationally representative samples of China and the US older population to investigate (1) whether factors influencing self-rated health among older Chinese were similar to those among older Americans; and (2) whether there was a significant cross-national difference in self-rated health between China and the USA after controlling those available influencing factors. Design: A cross-sectional study. Data came from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study and China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted from 2014 to 2015. Participants: Our final sample size totaled 8905 older adults in the USA and 4442 older adults in China. Outcome The response variable was self-rated health. Ordered logistic regression models were conducted to investigate factors influencing self-rated health among older adults. Results: More than three-fourths (78{\%}) of older adults in China reported fair or poor health status, while almost 74{\%} of older adults in the USA reported excellent, very good or good health status. In the overall ordered logistic regression model, when controlling statistically for sociodemographics, family structure, functional limitations, cognition, chronic conditions, mental health and health-related behaviours, the Chinese survey respondents were much more likely to rate their health as being poorer than the US respondents. The odds of having better versus poorer health was almost five times greater in American older adults than those in China (OR=4.88, 95{\%} CI 4.06 to 5.86). Older adults in China living alone rated their health better than those living with spouse/partner; however, no significant difference was found between these two living arrangements in older Americans. In contrast, older adults in the USA living with others rated their health worse compared with those living with spouse/partner. In addition, older adults who had more activities of daily living limitations, poorer self-reported memory, worse mental health and chronic health conditions had lower self-rated health in both countries. Conclusions: We found a striking difference in self-rated health between China and the USA even after controlling for measures of disease, functional status and other influencing factors. Relative to their American counterparts, Chinese elders were much more likely to report worse health.",
keywords = "China, living arrangement, older adults, self-rated health, the United States",
author = "Dongjuan Xu and Gregory Arling and Kefang Wang",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027895",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-sectional study of self-rated health among older adults

T2 - A comparison of China and the United States

AU - Xu, Dongjuan

AU - Arling, Gregory

AU - Wang, Kefang

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Objectives: We used nationally representative samples of China and the US older population to investigate (1) whether factors influencing self-rated health among older Chinese were similar to those among older Americans; and (2) whether there was a significant cross-national difference in self-rated health between China and the USA after controlling those available influencing factors. Design: A cross-sectional study. Data came from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study and China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted from 2014 to 2015. Participants: Our final sample size totaled 8905 older adults in the USA and 4442 older adults in China. Outcome The response variable was self-rated health. Ordered logistic regression models were conducted to investigate factors influencing self-rated health among older adults. Results: More than three-fourths (78%) of older adults in China reported fair or poor health status, while almost 74% of older adults in the USA reported excellent, very good or good health status. In the overall ordered logistic regression model, when controlling statistically for sociodemographics, family structure, functional limitations, cognition, chronic conditions, mental health and health-related behaviours, the Chinese survey respondents were much more likely to rate their health as being poorer than the US respondents. The odds of having better versus poorer health was almost five times greater in American older adults than those in China (OR=4.88, 95% CI 4.06 to 5.86). Older adults in China living alone rated their health better than those living with spouse/partner; however, no significant difference was found between these two living arrangements in older Americans. In contrast, older adults in the USA living with others rated their health worse compared with those living with spouse/partner. In addition, older adults who had more activities of daily living limitations, poorer self-reported memory, worse mental health and chronic health conditions had lower self-rated health in both countries. Conclusions: We found a striking difference in self-rated health between China and the USA even after controlling for measures of disease, functional status and other influencing factors. Relative to their American counterparts, Chinese elders were much more likely to report worse health.

AB - Objectives: We used nationally representative samples of China and the US older population to investigate (1) whether factors influencing self-rated health among older Chinese were similar to those among older Americans; and (2) whether there was a significant cross-national difference in self-rated health between China and the USA after controlling those available influencing factors. Design: A cross-sectional study. Data came from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study and China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted from 2014 to 2015. Participants: Our final sample size totaled 8905 older adults in the USA and 4442 older adults in China. Outcome The response variable was self-rated health. Ordered logistic regression models were conducted to investigate factors influencing self-rated health among older adults. Results: More than three-fourths (78%) of older adults in China reported fair or poor health status, while almost 74% of older adults in the USA reported excellent, very good or good health status. In the overall ordered logistic regression model, when controlling statistically for sociodemographics, family structure, functional limitations, cognition, chronic conditions, mental health and health-related behaviours, the Chinese survey respondents were much more likely to rate their health as being poorer than the US respondents. The odds of having better versus poorer health was almost five times greater in American older adults than those in China (OR=4.88, 95% CI 4.06 to 5.86). Older adults in China living alone rated their health better than those living with spouse/partner; however, no significant difference was found between these two living arrangements in older Americans. In contrast, older adults in the USA living with others rated their health worse compared with those living with spouse/partner. In addition, older adults who had more activities of daily living limitations, poorer self-reported memory, worse mental health and chronic health conditions had lower self-rated health in both countries. Conclusions: We found a striking difference in self-rated health between China and the USA even after controlling for measures of disease, functional status and other influencing factors. Relative to their American counterparts, Chinese elders were much more likely to report worse health.

KW - China

KW - living arrangement

KW - older adults

KW - self-rated health

KW - the United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070394828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070394828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027895

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027895

M3 - Article

C2 - 31371288

AN - SCOPUS:85070394828

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 7

M1 - e027895

ER -