A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units

Janice Buelow, Michael Privitera, Paul Levisohn, Gregory L. Barkley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: In the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), a patient whose seizures may be under control is placed in a medication-withdrawal situation to induce seizures for direct observation and recording. This withdrawal introduces patient risk. In addition, because the EMU is a complex medical and restrictive physical environment, other risks are brought into play. Patient management to reduce danger while optimizing results should arise from current evidence, but gaps exist in the literature regarding best practice in the EMU. In this article the authors report results of two national surveys of health care practitioners in specialized epilepsy care regarding current EMU practice. Methods: Two surveys were developed: one comprised of 17 questions for physicians who practice in an EMU, and one comprising 26 questions for nurses who practice in an EMU. Both surveys addressed such issues as protocols for medication withdrawal and rescue procedures, patient observers, and safety issues. Surveys were distributed via Zoomerang to 1500 physician and 105 nurse members of the American Epilepsy Society. Results were tabulated and presented as percentages for each question of each survey. Results: Responses came from 257 physicians (approximately 17%) and 39 nurses (37%). More than half of the responders practiced in large academic centers. No clear consensus of practice emerged on such questions as drug withdrawal, seizure observation, and rescue protocols. Safety precautions varied. Conclusion: An initial attempt to understand current practice in EMUs, our survey study showed a wide variation in practice patterns, some of which raise safety concerns. The data gathered can aid design of future studies that more directly address specific questions of safety in the EMU.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)308-313
Number of pages6
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Seizures
Nurses
Physicians
Safety
Observation
Health Care Surveys
Patient Safety
Practice Guidelines
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Epilepsy monitoring unit
  • Patient safety
  • Practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Buelow, J., Privitera, M., Levisohn, P., & Barkley, G. L. (2009). A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units. Epilepsy and Behavior, 15(3), 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.009

A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units. / Buelow, Janice; Privitera, Michael; Levisohn, Paul; Barkley, Gregory L.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 3, 07.2009, p. 308-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buelow, J, Privitera, M, Levisohn, P & Barkley, GL 2009, 'A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units', Epilepsy and Behavior, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.009
Buelow, Janice ; Privitera, Michael ; Levisohn, Paul ; Barkley, Gregory L. / A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2009 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 308-313.
@article{2f0fa98a289143f281421b70273428fb,
title = "A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units",
abstract = "Objective: In the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), a patient whose seizures may be under control is placed in a medication-withdrawal situation to induce seizures for direct observation and recording. This withdrawal introduces patient risk. In addition, because the EMU is a complex medical and restrictive physical environment, other risks are brought into play. Patient management to reduce danger while optimizing results should arise from current evidence, but gaps exist in the literature regarding best practice in the EMU. In this article the authors report results of two national surveys of health care practitioners in specialized epilepsy care regarding current EMU practice. Methods: Two surveys were developed: one comprised of 17 questions for physicians who practice in an EMU, and one comprising 26 questions for nurses who practice in an EMU. Both surveys addressed such issues as protocols for medication withdrawal and rescue procedures, patient observers, and safety issues. Surveys were distributed via Zoomerang to 1500 physician and 105 nurse members of the American Epilepsy Society. Results were tabulated and presented as percentages for each question of each survey. Results: Responses came from 257 physicians (approximately 17{\%}) and 39 nurses (37{\%}). More than half of the responders practiced in large academic centers. No clear consensus of practice emerged on such questions as drug withdrawal, seizure observation, and rescue protocols. Safety precautions varied. Conclusion: An initial attempt to understand current practice in EMUs, our survey study showed a wide variation in practice patterns, some of which raise safety concerns. The data gathered can aid design of future studies that more directly address specific questions of safety in the EMU.",
keywords = "Epilepsy monitoring unit, Patient safety, Practice",
author = "Janice Buelow and Michael Privitera and Paul Levisohn and Barkley, {Gregory L.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "308--313",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units

AU - Buelow, Janice

AU - Privitera, Michael

AU - Levisohn, Paul

AU - Barkley, Gregory L.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Objective: In the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), a patient whose seizures may be under control is placed in a medication-withdrawal situation to induce seizures for direct observation and recording. This withdrawal introduces patient risk. In addition, because the EMU is a complex medical and restrictive physical environment, other risks are brought into play. Patient management to reduce danger while optimizing results should arise from current evidence, but gaps exist in the literature regarding best practice in the EMU. In this article the authors report results of two national surveys of health care practitioners in specialized epilepsy care regarding current EMU practice. Methods: Two surveys were developed: one comprised of 17 questions for physicians who practice in an EMU, and one comprising 26 questions for nurses who practice in an EMU. Both surveys addressed such issues as protocols for medication withdrawal and rescue procedures, patient observers, and safety issues. Surveys were distributed via Zoomerang to 1500 physician and 105 nurse members of the American Epilepsy Society. Results were tabulated and presented as percentages for each question of each survey. Results: Responses came from 257 physicians (approximately 17%) and 39 nurses (37%). More than half of the responders practiced in large academic centers. No clear consensus of practice emerged on such questions as drug withdrawal, seizure observation, and rescue protocols. Safety precautions varied. Conclusion: An initial attempt to understand current practice in EMUs, our survey study showed a wide variation in practice patterns, some of which raise safety concerns. The data gathered can aid design of future studies that more directly address specific questions of safety in the EMU.

AB - Objective: In the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), a patient whose seizures may be under control is placed in a medication-withdrawal situation to induce seizures for direct observation and recording. This withdrawal introduces patient risk. In addition, because the EMU is a complex medical and restrictive physical environment, other risks are brought into play. Patient management to reduce danger while optimizing results should arise from current evidence, but gaps exist in the literature regarding best practice in the EMU. In this article the authors report results of two national surveys of health care practitioners in specialized epilepsy care regarding current EMU practice. Methods: Two surveys were developed: one comprised of 17 questions for physicians who practice in an EMU, and one comprising 26 questions for nurses who practice in an EMU. Both surveys addressed such issues as protocols for medication withdrawal and rescue procedures, patient observers, and safety issues. Surveys were distributed via Zoomerang to 1500 physician and 105 nurse members of the American Epilepsy Society. Results were tabulated and presented as percentages for each question of each survey. Results: Responses came from 257 physicians (approximately 17%) and 39 nurses (37%). More than half of the responders practiced in large academic centers. No clear consensus of practice emerged on such questions as drug withdrawal, seizure observation, and rescue protocols. Safety precautions varied. Conclusion: An initial attempt to understand current practice in EMUs, our survey study showed a wide variation in practice patterns, some of which raise safety concerns. The data gathered can aid design of future studies that more directly address specific questions of safety in the EMU.

KW - Epilepsy monitoring unit

KW - Patient safety

KW - Practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650383458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650383458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.009

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 308

EP - 313

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

IS - 3

ER -