A multicenter evaluation of tests for diagnosis of histoplasmosis

Chadi A. Hage, Julie A. Ribes, Nancy L. Wengenack, Larry M. Baddour, Maha Assi, David S. McKinsey, Kassem Hammoud, Daisy Alapat, N. Esther Babady, Michelle Parker, De Anna Fuller, Aliya Noor, Thomas E. Davis, Mark Rodgers, Patricia A. Connolly, Boutros El Haddad, L. Joseph Wheat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

183 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The sensitivity of the MVista Histoplasma antigen enzyme immunoassay (MiraVista Diagnostics) has been evaluated in disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS and in the "epidemic" form of acute pneumonia. Moreover, there has been no evaluation of the sensitivity of antigenemia detection in disseminated histoplasmosis after the implementation of methods to dissociate immune complexes and denature released antibodies. The goal of this study was to determine the sensitivity of the current antigen assay in different categories of histoplasmosis. Methods: Urine and serum specimens obtained from 218 patients with histoplasmosis and 229 control subjects, including 30 with blastomycosis, were tested. Results: Antigenuria was detected in 91.8% of 158 patients with disseminated histoplasmosis, 83.3% of 6 patients with acute histoplasmosis, 30.4% of 46 patients with subacute histoplasmosis, and 87.5% of 8 patients with chronic pulmonary histoplasmosis; antigenemia was present in 100% of 31 tested cases of disseminated histoplasmosis. Among patients with disseminated cases, antigenuria was detected more often and at higher concentrations in immunocompromised patients and those with severe disease. Specificity was 99.0% for patients with nonfungal infections (n = 130) and in healthy subjects (n = 69), but cross-reactivity occurred in 90% of patients with blastomycosis. Conclusions: The sensitivity of antigen detection in disseminated histoplasmosis is higher in immunocom-promised patients than in immunocompetent patients and in patients with more severe illness. The sensitivity for detection of antigenemia is similar to that for antigenuria in disseminated infection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-454
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A multicenter evaluation of tests for diagnosis of histoplasmosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hage, C. A., Ribes, J. A., Wengenack, N. L., Baddour, L. M., Assi, M., McKinsey, D. S., Hammoud, K., Alapat, D., Esther Babady, N., Parker, M., Fuller, D. A., Noor, A., Davis, T. E., Rodgers, M., Connolly, P. A., El Haddad, B., & Joseph Wheat, L. (2011). A multicenter evaluation of tests for diagnosis of histoplasmosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 53(5), 448-454. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir435