A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks

William M. Tierney, Caitlin C. Oppenheimer, Brenda L. Hudson, Jennifer Benz, Amy Finn, John M. Hickner, David Lanier, Daniel S. Gaylin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Increasing numbers of primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are being developed in the United States to perform research relevant to everyday practice. To assess the current status and potential value of this resource, we surveyed US primary care PBRNs in operation from late 2003 to early 2004. METHODS: We performed a Web-based survey and structured interviews with PBRN directors and administrative officers, assessing PBRNs' history, size, location, organization, resources, operations, and productivity (funding obtained, studies performed, and articles published). RESULTS: Of 111 primary care PBRNs identified, 89 (80%) responded to the survey. The 86 (77%) meeting the criteria for primary care PBRNs contained 1,871 practices, 12,957 physicians (mean 152 per PBRN, median 100), and 14.7 million patients (mean 229,880 per PBRN, median 105,000). Minority and underinsured patients were overrepresented. The average PBRN was young (4.4 ± 5.7 years): one-half had performed 3 or fewer studies. Three-quarters were affiliated with universities. Common research foci included prevention, diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors, and mental health. Respondent PBRNs had published more than 600 articles in peer-reviewed journals. PBRNs studying questions posed by outside researchers had more federal funding (84% vs 27%, P = .006). PBRNs citing funding as a weakness relied more on local resources to fund research projects (70% vs 40%, P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: American primary care PBRNs are mainly young, diverse, and pursuing a variety of research foci. Most have university links and provide a dynamic town-gown relationship that could be a vital national resource for improving primary care, translating research into practice, and meeting the National Institutes of Health Roadmap goals. PBRNs merit further attention from both private and public funding agencies and researchers interested in studying the delivery of primary care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-250
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Personnel
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Financial Management
Mental Health

Keywords

  • Practice-based research
  • Primary care
  • Research networks
  • Survey research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Tierney, W. M., Oppenheimer, C. C., Hudson, B. L., Benz, J., Finn, A., Hickner, J. M., ... Gaylin, D. S. (2007). A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. Annals of Family Medicine, 5(3), 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.699

A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. / Tierney, William M.; Oppenheimer, Caitlin C.; Hudson, Brenda L.; Benz, Jennifer; Finn, Amy; Hickner, John M.; Lanier, David; Gaylin, Daniel S.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 242-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tierney, WM, Oppenheimer, CC, Hudson, BL, Benz, J, Finn, A, Hickner, JM, Lanier, D & Gaylin, DS 2007, 'A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks', Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.699
Tierney WM, Oppenheimer CC, Hudson BL, Benz J, Finn A, Hickner JM et al. A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. Annals of Family Medicine. 2007 May;5(3):242-250. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.699
Tierney, William M. ; Oppenheimer, Caitlin C. ; Hudson, Brenda L. ; Benz, Jennifer ; Finn, Amy ; Hickner, John M. ; Lanier, David ; Gaylin, Daniel S. / A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 242-250.
@article{d07e0b5e513048f79a289ecd5d6adf7c,
title = "A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Increasing numbers of primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are being developed in the United States to perform research relevant to everyday practice. To assess the current status and potential value of this resource, we surveyed US primary care PBRNs in operation from late 2003 to early 2004. METHODS: We performed a Web-based survey and structured interviews with PBRN directors and administrative officers, assessing PBRNs' history, size, location, organization, resources, operations, and productivity (funding obtained, studies performed, and articles published). RESULTS: Of 111 primary care PBRNs identified, 89 (80{\%}) responded to the survey. The 86 (77{\%}) meeting the criteria for primary care PBRNs contained 1,871 practices, 12,957 physicians (mean 152 per PBRN, median 100), and 14.7 million patients (mean 229,880 per PBRN, median 105,000). Minority and underinsured patients were overrepresented. The average PBRN was young (4.4 ± 5.7 years): one-half had performed 3 or fewer studies. Three-quarters were affiliated with universities. Common research foci included prevention, diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors, and mental health. Respondent PBRNs had published more than 600 articles in peer-reviewed journals. PBRNs studying questions posed by outside researchers had more federal funding (84{\%} vs 27{\%}, P = .006). PBRNs citing funding as a weakness relied more on local resources to fund research projects (70{\%} vs 40{\%}, P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: American primary care PBRNs are mainly young, diverse, and pursuing a variety of research foci. Most have university links and provide a dynamic town-gown relationship that could be a vital national resource for improving primary care, translating research into practice, and meeting the National Institutes of Health Roadmap goals. PBRNs merit further attention from both private and public funding agencies and researchers interested in studying the delivery of primary care.",
keywords = "Practice-based research, Primary care, Research networks, Survey research",
author = "Tierney, {William M.} and Oppenheimer, {Caitlin C.} and Hudson, {Brenda L.} and Jennifer Benz and Amy Finn and Hickner, {John M.} and David Lanier and Gaylin, {Daniel S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1370/afm.699",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "242--250",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks

AU - Tierney, William M.

AU - Oppenheimer, Caitlin C.

AU - Hudson, Brenda L.

AU - Benz, Jennifer

AU - Finn, Amy

AU - Hickner, John M.

AU - Lanier, David

AU - Gaylin, Daniel S.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - PURPOSE: Increasing numbers of primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are being developed in the United States to perform research relevant to everyday practice. To assess the current status and potential value of this resource, we surveyed US primary care PBRNs in operation from late 2003 to early 2004. METHODS: We performed a Web-based survey and structured interviews with PBRN directors and administrative officers, assessing PBRNs' history, size, location, organization, resources, operations, and productivity (funding obtained, studies performed, and articles published). RESULTS: Of 111 primary care PBRNs identified, 89 (80%) responded to the survey. The 86 (77%) meeting the criteria for primary care PBRNs contained 1,871 practices, 12,957 physicians (mean 152 per PBRN, median 100), and 14.7 million patients (mean 229,880 per PBRN, median 105,000). Minority and underinsured patients were overrepresented. The average PBRN was young (4.4 ± 5.7 years): one-half had performed 3 or fewer studies. Three-quarters were affiliated with universities. Common research foci included prevention, diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors, and mental health. Respondent PBRNs had published more than 600 articles in peer-reviewed journals. PBRNs studying questions posed by outside researchers had more federal funding (84% vs 27%, P = .006). PBRNs citing funding as a weakness relied more on local resources to fund research projects (70% vs 40%, P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: American primary care PBRNs are mainly young, diverse, and pursuing a variety of research foci. Most have university links and provide a dynamic town-gown relationship that could be a vital national resource for improving primary care, translating research into practice, and meeting the National Institutes of Health Roadmap goals. PBRNs merit further attention from both private and public funding agencies and researchers interested in studying the delivery of primary care.

AB - PURPOSE: Increasing numbers of primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are being developed in the United States to perform research relevant to everyday practice. To assess the current status and potential value of this resource, we surveyed US primary care PBRNs in operation from late 2003 to early 2004. METHODS: We performed a Web-based survey and structured interviews with PBRN directors and administrative officers, assessing PBRNs' history, size, location, organization, resources, operations, and productivity (funding obtained, studies performed, and articles published). RESULTS: Of 111 primary care PBRNs identified, 89 (80%) responded to the survey. The 86 (77%) meeting the criteria for primary care PBRNs contained 1,871 practices, 12,957 physicians (mean 152 per PBRN, median 100), and 14.7 million patients (mean 229,880 per PBRN, median 105,000). Minority and underinsured patients were overrepresented. The average PBRN was young (4.4 ± 5.7 years): one-half had performed 3 or fewer studies. Three-quarters were affiliated with universities. Common research foci included prevention, diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors, and mental health. Respondent PBRNs had published more than 600 articles in peer-reviewed journals. PBRNs studying questions posed by outside researchers had more federal funding (84% vs 27%, P = .006). PBRNs citing funding as a weakness relied more on local resources to fund research projects (70% vs 40%, P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: American primary care PBRNs are mainly young, diverse, and pursuing a variety of research foci. Most have university links and provide a dynamic town-gown relationship that could be a vital national resource for improving primary care, translating research into practice, and meeting the National Institutes of Health Roadmap goals. PBRNs merit further attention from both private and public funding agencies and researchers interested in studying the delivery of primary care.

KW - Practice-based research

KW - Primary care

KW - Research networks

KW - Survey research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249991419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249991419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.699

DO - 10.1370/afm.699

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 242

EP - 250

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 3

ER -