A prospective examination of asthma symptom monitoring: Provider, caregiver and pediatric patient influences on peak flow meter use

Guadalupe X. Ayala, Chris Gillette, Dennis Williams, Stephanie Davis, Karin B. Yeatts, Delesha M. Carpenter, Betsy Sleath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined whether provider, caregiver and child communication predicted peak flow meter (PFM) use one month later. Methods: Five practices, 35 providers and 296 children with persistent asthma and their caregivers comprised the study sample. Audio-recorded provider-caregiver-child communication during the baseline medical visit captured discussion of the PFM; and child and caregiver baseline interviews after the medical visit collected factors associated with PFM use. Child- and caregiver-reported PFM availability and use, and observed child use of PFM were collected one-month later in the family's home. Results: During the medical visit, provider communication about PFM use was infrequent (10% maximum) and child- or caregiver-initiated communication was nearly absent (0%-2%). Despite this, children demonstrated good use of the PFM one month later. Children were significantly more likely to perform at least six PFM steps correctly one month later when there was more communication about PFM during the medical visit. Few other factors predicted availability and use. Conclusions: Few providers discussed use of a PFM; observed performance was predicted by having talked about it with the child's provider. Provider communication should be targeted in future interventions to improve asthma management skills.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-90
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Asthma
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Asthma
Pediatrics
Communication
Interviews

Keywords

  • Children
  • Peak flow meters
  • Predictors
  • Provider-patient communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

A prospective examination of asthma symptom monitoring : Provider, caregiver and pediatric patient influences on peak flow meter use. / Ayala, Guadalupe X.; Gillette, Chris; Williams, Dennis; Davis, Stephanie; Yeatts, Karin B.; Carpenter, Delesha M.; Sleath, Betsy.

In: Journal of Asthma, Vol. 51, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 84-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ayala, Guadalupe X. ; Gillette, Chris ; Williams, Dennis ; Davis, Stephanie ; Yeatts, Karin B. ; Carpenter, Delesha M. ; Sleath, Betsy. / A prospective examination of asthma symptom monitoring : Provider, caregiver and pediatric patient influences on peak flow meter use. In: Journal of Asthma. 2014 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 84-90.
@article{6a22d6606da84bd98777e6067f33f76c,
title = "A prospective examination of asthma symptom monitoring: Provider, caregiver and pediatric patient influences on peak flow meter use",
abstract = "Objective: This study examined whether provider, caregiver and child communication predicted peak flow meter (PFM) use one month later. Methods: Five practices, 35 providers and 296 children with persistent asthma and their caregivers comprised the study sample. Audio-recorded provider-caregiver-child communication during the baseline medical visit captured discussion of the PFM; and child and caregiver baseline interviews after the medical visit collected factors associated with PFM use. Child- and caregiver-reported PFM availability and use, and observed child use of PFM were collected one-month later in the family's home. Results: During the medical visit, provider communication about PFM use was infrequent (10{\%} maximum) and child- or caregiver-initiated communication was nearly absent (0{\%}-2{\%}). Despite this, children demonstrated good use of the PFM one month later. Children were significantly more likely to perform at least six PFM steps correctly one month later when there was more communication about PFM during the medical visit. Few other factors predicted availability and use. Conclusions: Few providers discussed use of a PFM; observed performance was predicted by having talked about it with the child's provider. Provider communication should be targeted in future interventions to improve asthma management skills.",
keywords = "Children, Peak flow meters, Predictors, Provider-patient communication",
author = "Ayala, {Guadalupe X.} and Chris Gillette and Dennis Williams and Stephanie Davis and Yeatts, {Karin B.} and Carpenter, {Delesha M.} and Betsy Sleath",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.3109/02770903.2013.838255",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "84--90",
journal = "Journal of Asthma",
issn = "0277-0903",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective examination of asthma symptom monitoring

T2 - Provider, caregiver and pediatric patient influences on peak flow meter use

AU - Ayala, Guadalupe X.

AU - Gillette, Chris

AU - Williams, Dennis

AU - Davis, Stephanie

AU - Yeatts, Karin B.

AU - Carpenter, Delesha M.

AU - Sleath, Betsy

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Objective: This study examined whether provider, caregiver and child communication predicted peak flow meter (PFM) use one month later. Methods: Five practices, 35 providers and 296 children with persistent asthma and their caregivers comprised the study sample. Audio-recorded provider-caregiver-child communication during the baseline medical visit captured discussion of the PFM; and child and caregiver baseline interviews after the medical visit collected factors associated with PFM use. Child- and caregiver-reported PFM availability and use, and observed child use of PFM were collected one-month later in the family's home. Results: During the medical visit, provider communication about PFM use was infrequent (10% maximum) and child- or caregiver-initiated communication was nearly absent (0%-2%). Despite this, children demonstrated good use of the PFM one month later. Children were significantly more likely to perform at least six PFM steps correctly one month later when there was more communication about PFM during the medical visit. Few other factors predicted availability and use. Conclusions: Few providers discussed use of a PFM; observed performance was predicted by having talked about it with the child's provider. Provider communication should be targeted in future interventions to improve asthma management skills.

AB - Objective: This study examined whether provider, caregiver and child communication predicted peak flow meter (PFM) use one month later. Methods: Five practices, 35 providers and 296 children with persistent asthma and their caregivers comprised the study sample. Audio-recorded provider-caregiver-child communication during the baseline medical visit captured discussion of the PFM; and child and caregiver baseline interviews after the medical visit collected factors associated with PFM use. Child- and caregiver-reported PFM availability and use, and observed child use of PFM were collected one-month later in the family's home. Results: During the medical visit, provider communication about PFM use was infrequent (10% maximum) and child- or caregiver-initiated communication was nearly absent (0%-2%). Despite this, children demonstrated good use of the PFM one month later. Children were significantly more likely to perform at least six PFM steps correctly one month later when there was more communication about PFM during the medical visit. Few other factors predicted availability and use. Conclusions: Few providers discussed use of a PFM; observed performance was predicted by having talked about it with the child's provider. Provider communication should be targeted in future interventions to improve asthma management skills.

KW - Children

KW - Peak flow meters

KW - Predictors

KW - Provider-patient communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893084696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893084696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02770903.2013.838255

DO - 10.3109/02770903.2013.838255

M3 - Article

C2 - 24020680

AN - SCOPUS:84893084696

VL - 51

SP - 84

EP - 90

JO - Journal of Asthma

JF - Journal of Asthma

SN - 0277-0903

IS - 1

ER -