A qualitative analysis of the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship

parents’ descriptions of their intentions, decision-making behaviour and planning processes towards HPV vaccination

Beth A. Auslander, Jessica M. Meers, Mary B. Short, Gregory Zimet, Susan L. Rosenthal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors influencing the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship. Design: A total of 445 parents who received a brief intervention to promote HPV vaccination were categorized based on their intentions post-intervention (yes/unsure/eventually/never) and subsequent adolescents’ vaccine status (yes/no). Fifty-one of these parents participated in qualitative interviews. Main Outcome Measures: Parents described their intentions, decision-making and planning processes towards vaccination. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Parents in the ‘Yes/Yes’ category were knowledgeable about HPV/vaccine, described strong, stable intentions, considered themselves the primary decision-makers about vaccination and said they vaccinated immediately. ‘Yes/No’ parents described strong intentions and thought their adolescent was vaccinated OR described hesitant intentions, seeking advice/agreement from others and noting barriers to vaccination without solutions. ‘Unsure/Yes’ parents described their intentions as strengthening with information from credible sources and identified strategies for overcoming barriers. ‘Unsure/No’ and ‘Eventually/No’ parents had misinformation/negative beliefs regarding vaccination, described being ambivalent or non-supportive of vaccination and cited barriers to vaccination. ‘Never/No’ parents held negative beliefs about vaccination, described strong, stable intentions to NOT vaccinate, deferring the decision to others, and reported no planning towards vaccination. Conclusions: Intention characteristics and planning processes could moderate the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship, potentially serving as targets for future vaccine strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychology and Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Vaccination
Vaccines
Parents
Papillomavirus Vaccines
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews

Keywords

  • ambivalence
  • HPV vaccination
  • Human papillomavirus
  • intention–behaviour relationship
  • parent vaccine decision-making
  • vaccine acceptance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{58cdf7a731ad40c69964e0301e2938f9,
title = "A qualitative analysis of the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship: parents’ descriptions of their intentions, decision-making behaviour and planning processes towards HPV vaccination",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors influencing the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship. Design: A total of 445 parents who received a brief intervention to promote HPV vaccination were categorized based on their intentions post-intervention (yes/unsure/eventually/never) and subsequent adolescents’ vaccine status (yes/no). Fifty-one of these parents participated in qualitative interviews. Main Outcome Measures: Parents described their intentions, decision-making and planning processes towards vaccination. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Parents in the ‘Yes/Yes’ category were knowledgeable about HPV/vaccine, described strong, stable intentions, considered themselves the primary decision-makers about vaccination and said they vaccinated immediately. ‘Yes/No’ parents described strong intentions and thought their adolescent was vaccinated OR described hesitant intentions, seeking advice/agreement from others and noting barriers to vaccination without solutions. ‘Unsure/Yes’ parents described their intentions as strengthening with information from credible sources and identified strategies for overcoming barriers. ‘Unsure/No’ and ‘Eventually/No’ parents had misinformation/negative beliefs regarding vaccination, described being ambivalent or non-supportive of vaccination and cited barriers to vaccination. ‘Never/No’ parents held negative beliefs about vaccination, described strong, stable intentions to NOT vaccinate, deferring the decision to others, and reported no planning towards vaccination. Conclusions: Intention characteristics and planning processes could moderate the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship, potentially serving as targets for future vaccine strategies.",
keywords = "ambivalence, HPV vaccination, Human papillomavirus, intention–behaviour relationship, parent vaccine decision-making, vaccine acceptance",
author = "Auslander, {Beth A.} and Meers, {Jessica M.} and Short, {Mary B.} and Gregory Zimet and Rosenthal, {Susan L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2018.1523408",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative analysis of the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship

T2 - parents’ descriptions of their intentions, decision-making behaviour and planning processes towards HPV vaccination

AU - Auslander, Beth A.

AU - Meers, Jessica M.

AU - Short, Mary B.

AU - Zimet, Gregory

AU - Rosenthal, Susan L.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors influencing the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship. Design: A total of 445 parents who received a brief intervention to promote HPV vaccination were categorized based on their intentions post-intervention (yes/unsure/eventually/never) and subsequent adolescents’ vaccine status (yes/no). Fifty-one of these parents participated in qualitative interviews. Main Outcome Measures: Parents described their intentions, decision-making and planning processes towards vaccination. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Parents in the ‘Yes/Yes’ category were knowledgeable about HPV/vaccine, described strong, stable intentions, considered themselves the primary decision-makers about vaccination and said they vaccinated immediately. ‘Yes/No’ parents described strong intentions and thought their adolescent was vaccinated OR described hesitant intentions, seeking advice/agreement from others and noting barriers to vaccination without solutions. ‘Unsure/Yes’ parents described their intentions as strengthening with information from credible sources and identified strategies for overcoming barriers. ‘Unsure/No’ and ‘Eventually/No’ parents had misinformation/negative beliefs regarding vaccination, described being ambivalent or non-supportive of vaccination and cited barriers to vaccination. ‘Never/No’ parents held negative beliefs about vaccination, described strong, stable intentions to NOT vaccinate, deferring the decision to others, and reported no planning towards vaccination. Conclusions: Intention characteristics and planning processes could moderate the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship, potentially serving as targets for future vaccine strategies.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors influencing the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship. Design: A total of 445 parents who received a brief intervention to promote HPV vaccination were categorized based on their intentions post-intervention (yes/unsure/eventually/never) and subsequent adolescents’ vaccine status (yes/no). Fifty-one of these parents participated in qualitative interviews. Main Outcome Measures: Parents described their intentions, decision-making and planning processes towards vaccination. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Parents in the ‘Yes/Yes’ category were knowledgeable about HPV/vaccine, described strong, stable intentions, considered themselves the primary decision-makers about vaccination and said they vaccinated immediately. ‘Yes/No’ parents described strong intentions and thought their adolescent was vaccinated OR described hesitant intentions, seeking advice/agreement from others and noting barriers to vaccination without solutions. ‘Unsure/Yes’ parents described their intentions as strengthening with information from credible sources and identified strategies for overcoming barriers. ‘Unsure/No’ and ‘Eventually/No’ parents had misinformation/negative beliefs regarding vaccination, described being ambivalent or non-supportive of vaccination and cited barriers to vaccination. ‘Never/No’ parents held negative beliefs about vaccination, described strong, stable intentions to NOT vaccinate, deferring the decision to others, and reported no planning towards vaccination. Conclusions: Intention characteristics and planning processes could moderate the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship, potentially serving as targets for future vaccine strategies.

KW - ambivalence

KW - HPV vaccination

KW - Human papillomavirus

KW - intention–behaviour relationship

KW - parent vaccine decision-making

KW - vaccine acceptance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057547777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057547777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2018.1523408

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2018.1523408

M3 - Article

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

ER -