A Randomized Trial of Three Videos that Differ in the Framing of Information about Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years Old

Carmen L. Lewis, Michael P. Pignone, Stacey L. Sheridan, Stephen Downs, Linda S. Kinsinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of providing structured information about the benefits and harms of mammography in differing frames on women's perceptions of screening. DESIGN: Randomized control trial. SETTING: General internal medicine academic practice. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-nine women aged 35 through 49. INTERVENTION: Women received 1 of 3 5-minute videos about the benefits and harms of screening mammography in women aged 40 to 49. These videos differed only in the way the probabilities of potential outcomes were framed (positive, neutral, or negative). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the change in accurate responses to questions about potential benefits and harms of mammography, and the change in the proportion of participants who perceived that the benefits of mammography were more important than the harms. Before seeing the videos, women's knowledge about the benefits and harms of mammography was inaccurate (82% responded incorrectly to all 3 knowledge questions). After seeing the videos, the proportion that answered correctly increased by 52%, 43%, and 30% for the 3 knowledge questions, respectively, but there were no differences between video frames. At baseline, most women thought the benefits of mammography outweighed the harms (79% positive frame, 80% neutral frame, and 85% negative frame). After the videos, these proportions were similar among the 3 groups (84%, 81%, 83%, P = .93). CONCLUSIONS: Women improved the accuracy of their responses to questions about the benefits and harms of mammography after seeing the videos, but this change was not affected by the framing of information. Women strongly perceived that the benefits of mammography outweighed the harms, and providing accurate information had no effect on these perceptions, regardless of how it was framed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)875-883
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2003

Fingerprint

Mammography
Internal Medicine

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Informed consent
  • Mammography
  • Physician-patient relations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

A Randomized Trial of Three Videos that Differ in the Framing of Information about Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years Old. / Lewis, Carmen L.; Pignone, Michael P.; Sheridan, Stacey L.; Downs, Stephen; Kinsinger, Linda S.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 11, 11.2003, p. 875-883.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, Carmen L. ; Pignone, Michael P. ; Sheridan, Stacey L. ; Downs, Stephen ; Kinsinger, Linda S. / A Randomized Trial of Three Videos that Differ in the Framing of Information about Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years Old. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 18, No. 11. pp. 875-883.
@article{9b3868fe4d33473fa18f70bcda826c45,
title = "A Randomized Trial of Three Videos that Differ in the Framing of Information about Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years Old",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of providing structured information about the benefits and harms of mammography in differing frames on women's perceptions of screening. DESIGN: Randomized control trial. SETTING: General internal medicine academic practice. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-nine women aged 35 through 49. INTERVENTION: Women received 1 of 3 5-minute videos about the benefits and harms of screening mammography in women aged 40 to 49. These videos differed only in the way the probabilities of potential outcomes were framed (positive, neutral, or negative). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the change in accurate responses to questions about potential benefits and harms of mammography, and the change in the proportion of participants who perceived that the benefits of mammography were more important than the harms. Before seeing the videos, women's knowledge about the benefits and harms of mammography was inaccurate (82{\%} responded incorrectly to all 3 knowledge questions). After seeing the videos, the proportion that answered correctly increased by 52{\%}, 43{\%}, and 30{\%} for the 3 knowledge questions, respectively, but there were no differences between video frames. At baseline, most women thought the benefits of mammography outweighed the harms (79{\%} positive frame, 80{\%} neutral frame, and 85{\%} negative frame). After the videos, these proportions were similar among the 3 groups (84{\%}, 81{\%}, 83{\%}, P = .93). CONCLUSIONS: Women improved the accuracy of their responses to questions about the benefits and harms of mammography after seeing the videos, but this change was not affected by the framing of information. Women strongly perceived that the benefits of mammography outweighed the harms, and providing accurate information had no effect on these perceptions, regardless of how it was framed.",
keywords = "Decision making, Informed consent, Mammography, Physician-patient relations",
author = "Lewis, {Carmen L.} and Pignone, {Michael P.} and Sheridan, {Stacey L.} and Stephen Downs and Kinsinger, {Linda S.}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21152.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "875--883",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Randomized Trial of Three Videos that Differ in the Framing of Information about Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years Old

AU - Lewis, Carmen L.

AU - Pignone, Michael P.

AU - Sheridan, Stacey L.

AU - Downs, Stephen

AU - Kinsinger, Linda S.

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of providing structured information about the benefits and harms of mammography in differing frames on women's perceptions of screening. DESIGN: Randomized control trial. SETTING: General internal medicine academic practice. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-nine women aged 35 through 49. INTERVENTION: Women received 1 of 3 5-minute videos about the benefits and harms of screening mammography in women aged 40 to 49. These videos differed only in the way the probabilities of potential outcomes were framed (positive, neutral, or negative). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the change in accurate responses to questions about potential benefits and harms of mammography, and the change in the proportion of participants who perceived that the benefits of mammography were more important than the harms. Before seeing the videos, women's knowledge about the benefits and harms of mammography was inaccurate (82% responded incorrectly to all 3 knowledge questions). After seeing the videos, the proportion that answered correctly increased by 52%, 43%, and 30% for the 3 knowledge questions, respectively, but there were no differences between video frames. At baseline, most women thought the benefits of mammography outweighed the harms (79% positive frame, 80% neutral frame, and 85% negative frame). After the videos, these proportions were similar among the 3 groups (84%, 81%, 83%, P = .93). CONCLUSIONS: Women improved the accuracy of their responses to questions about the benefits and harms of mammography after seeing the videos, but this change was not affected by the framing of information. Women strongly perceived that the benefits of mammography outweighed the harms, and providing accurate information had no effect on these perceptions, regardless of how it was framed.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of providing structured information about the benefits and harms of mammography in differing frames on women's perceptions of screening. DESIGN: Randomized control trial. SETTING: General internal medicine academic practice. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-nine women aged 35 through 49. INTERVENTION: Women received 1 of 3 5-minute videos about the benefits and harms of screening mammography in women aged 40 to 49. These videos differed only in the way the probabilities of potential outcomes were framed (positive, neutral, or negative). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the change in accurate responses to questions about potential benefits and harms of mammography, and the change in the proportion of participants who perceived that the benefits of mammography were more important than the harms. Before seeing the videos, women's knowledge about the benefits and harms of mammography was inaccurate (82% responded incorrectly to all 3 knowledge questions). After seeing the videos, the proportion that answered correctly increased by 52%, 43%, and 30% for the 3 knowledge questions, respectively, but there were no differences between video frames. At baseline, most women thought the benefits of mammography outweighed the harms (79% positive frame, 80% neutral frame, and 85% negative frame). After the videos, these proportions were similar among the 3 groups (84%, 81%, 83%, P = .93). CONCLUSIONS: Women improved the accuracy of their responses to questions about the benefits and harms of mammography after seeing the videos, but this change was not affected by the framing of information. Women strongly perceived that the benefits of mammography outweighed the harms, and providing accurate information had no effect on these perceptions, regardless of how it was framed.

KW - Decision making

KW - Informed consent

KW - Mammography

KW - Physician-patient relations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344664538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344664538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21152.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21152.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 875

EP - 883

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 11

ER -