A review of supportive care interventions to manage distress in young children with cancer and parents

Sheri Robb, Deanna Hanson-Abromeit

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: There is a positive relationship between parent and young child distress during cancer treatment. Dimensions of parent/child distress are multifaceted and associated with family function and quality of life outcomes. A critical examination of intervention research is needed to identify how dimensions of parent/child distress and related outcomes are being addressed. OBJECTIVE:: The aims of this study were to summarize and describe supportive care intervention research for young children with cancer and parents and to discuss implications for family-based intervention research. METHODS:: This systematic review examined supportive care intervention studies with randomized and nonrandomized designs for young children with cancer (aged 3-8 years) and/or their parents published between 1991 and 2011. Twenty-two studies that met specific inclusion criteria were reviewed to determine intervention type, intervention components, targeted outcomes and findings, and whether interventions addressed child, parent, or parent/child needs. RESULTS:: Most interventions focused primarily on procedural support, followed by parent education/counseling. Most studies targeted the child or the parent alone; very few targeted parent/child dyads. Outcomes focused primarily on child distress, anxiety, and pain. Quality of life and coping were rarely measured, and no studies examined family function. This body of research is emerging, with most interventions in the developmental pilot phase and few efficacy trials. CONCLUSIONS:: Findings confirm underrepresentation of young children in supportive care intervention research and the need for more complex, family-based interventions to advance young child intervention research beyond acute, procedural distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:: The authors discuss the implications of review findings for clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCancer Nursing
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Parents
Neoplasms
Research
Quality of Life
Counseling
Anxiety
Education
Pain

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Child
  • Family relations
  • Intervention studies
  • Parents
  • Preschool
  • Psychological
  • Review
  • Systematic stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A review of supportive care interventions to manage distress in young children with cancer and parents. / Robb, Sheri; Hanson-Abromeit, Deanna.

In: Cancer Nursing, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b52e91ce1d7e4f00b86bf911008199da,
title = "A review of supportive care interventions to manage distress in young children with cancer and parents",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: There is a positive relationship between parent and young child distress during cancer treatment. Dimensions of parent/child distress are multifaceted and associated with family function and quality of life outcomes. A critical examination of intervention research is needed to identify how dimensions of parent/child distress and related outcomes are being addressed. OBJECTIVE:: The aims of this study were to summarize and describe supportive care intervention research for young children with cancer and parents and to discuss implications for family-based intervention research. METHODS:: This systematic review examined supportive care intervention studies with randomized and nonrandomized designs for young children with cancer (aged 3-8 years) and/or their parents published between 1991 and 2011. Twenty-two studies that met specific inclusion criteria were reviewed to determine intervention type, intervention components, targeted outcomes and findings, and whether interventions addressed child, parent, or parent/child needs. RESULTS:: Most interventions focused primarily on procedural support, followed by parent education/counseling. Most studies targeted the child or the parent alone; very few targeted parent/child dyads. Outcomes focused primarily on child distress, anxiety, and pain. Quality of life and coping were rarely measured, and no studies examined family function. This body of research is emerging, with most interventions in the developmental pilot phase and few efficacy trials. CONCLUSIONS:: Findings confirm underrepresentation of young children in supportive care intervention research and the need for more complex, family-based interventions to advance young child intervention research beyond acute, procedural distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:: The authors discuss the implications of review findings for clinical practice.",
keywords = "Cancer, Child, Family relations, Intervention studies, Parents, Preschool, Psychological, Review, Systematic stress",
author = "Sheri Robb and Deanna Hanson-Abromeit",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/NCC.0000000000000095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Cancer Nursing",
issn = "0162-220X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of supportive care interventions to manage distress in young children with cancer and parents

AU - Robb, Sheri

AU - Hanson-Abromeit, Deanna

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND:: There is a positive relationship between parent and young child distress during cancer treatment. Dimensions of parent/child distress are multifaceted and associated with family function and quality of life outcomes. A critical examination of intervention research is needed to identify how dimensions of parent/child distress and related outcomes are being addressed. OBJECTIVE:: The aims of this study were to summarize and describe supportive care intervention research for young children with cancer and parents and to discuss implications for family-based intervention research. METHODS:: This systematic review examined supportive care intervention studies with randomized and nonrandomized designs for young children with cancer (aged 3-8 years) and/or their parents published between 1991 and 2011. Twenty-two studies that met specific inclusion criteria were reviewed to determine intervention type, intervention components, targeted outcomes and findings, and whether interventions addressed child, parent, or parent/child needs. RESULTS:: Most interventions focused primarily on procedural support, followed by parent education/counseling. Most studies targeted the child or the parent alone; very few targeted parent/child dyads. Outcomes focused primarily on child distress, anxiety, and pain. Quality of life and coping were rarely measured, and no studies examined family function. This body of research is emerging, with most interventions in the developmental pilot phase and few efficacy trials. CONCLUSIONS:: Findings confirm underrepresentation of young children in supportive care intervention research and the need for more complex, family-based interventions to advance young child intervention research beyond acute, procedural distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:: The authors discuss the implications of review findings for clinical practice.

AB - BACKGROUND:: There is a positive relationship between parent and young child distress during cancer treatment. Dimensions of parent/child distress are multifaceted and associated with family function and quality of life outcomes. A critical examination of intervention research is needed to identify how dimensions of parent/child distress and related outcomes are being addressed. OBJECTIVE:: The aims of this study were to summarize and describe supportive care intervention research for young children with cancer and parents and to discuss implications for family-based intervention research. METHODS:: This systematic review examined supportive care intervention studies with randomized and nonrandomized designs for young children with cancer (aged 3-8 years) and/or their parents published between 1991 and 2011. Twenty-two studies that met specific inclusion criteria were reviewed to determine intervention type, intervention components, targeted outcomes and findings, and whether interventions addressed child, parent, or parent/child needs. RESULTS:: Most interventions focused primarily on procedural support, followed by parent education/counseling. Most studies targeted the child or the parent alone; very few targeted parent/child dyads. Outcomes focused primarily on child distress, anxiety, and pain. Quality of life and coping were rarely measured, and no studies examined family function. This body of research is emerging, with most interventions in the developmental pilot phase and few efficacy trials. CONCLUSIONS:: Findings confirm underrepresentation of young children in supportive care intervention research and the need for more complex, family-based interventions to advance young child intervention research beyond acute, procedural distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:: The authors discuss the implications of review findings for clinical practice.

KW - Cancer

KW - Child

KW - Family relations

KW - Intervention studies

KW - Parents

KW - Preschool

KW - Psychological

KW - Review

KW - Systematic stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902578295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902578295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000095

DO - 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000095

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24936752

AN - SCOPUS:84902578295

VL - 37

JO - Cancer Nursing

JF - Cancer Nursing

SN - 0162-220X

IS - 4

ER -