A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States

Leslie M. Beitsch, Samata Kodolikar, Tim Stephens, Daniel Shodell, Art Clawson, Nir Menachemi, Robert G. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. Given the national effort to respond to the challenge of terrorism post-9/11, this study examined the organizational structure of state public health preparedness programs across the country, their administration, and the personnel and resources supported through federal cooperative agreements and state funds. Methods. In Fall 2004, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials surveyed state public health preparedness directors of all 50 states and territories of the United States regarding the organizational structure, administration, personnel, and resources of the state public health preparedness programs. Results. Individuals representing 45 states and the District of Columbia responded to the web-based questionnaire for a response rate of 88.2%. States tended to subdivide their organizations into regions for preparedness purposes. More than half the established preparedness regions (53.8%) were created post-9/11. Preparedness program directors frequently reported directly to either the state health official (40.0%) or a deputy state health official (33.3%). Responsibility for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) cooperative agreements was predominantly vested in one person (73.3%). Federal resources were found to support needed preparedness workforce (CDC mean=117.1 full-time equivalents [FTEs]; HRSA mean=10.6 FTEs). In addition, 36.6% of the states also contributed to the public health preparedness budget. Conclusions. This study of state public health agency preparedness provides new information about state-level organizational structure, administration, and support of preparedness programs. It offers the first comprehensive insights into the approaches states have adopted to build infrastructure and develop capacity through CDC and HRSA funding streams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)737-745
Number of pages9
JournalPublic Health Reports
Volume121
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

United States Health Resources and Services Administration
Public Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Health
Terrorism
Budgets
Financial Management
Organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Beitsch, L. M., Kodolikar, S., Stephens, T., Shodell, D., Clawson, A., Menachemi, N., & Brooks, R. G. (2006). A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States. Public Health Reports, 121(6), 737-745.

A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States. / Beitsch, Leslie M.; Kodolikar, Samata; Stephens, Tim; Shodell, Daniel; Clawson, Art; Menachemi, Nir; Brooks, Robert G.

In: Public Health Reports, Vol. 121, No. 6, 01.11.2006, p. 737-745.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beitsch, LM, Kodolikar, S, Stephens, T, Shodell, D, Clawson, A, Menachemi, N & Brooks, RG 2006, 'A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States', Public Health Reports, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 737-745.
Beitsch LM, Kodolikar S, Stephens T, Shodell D, Clawson A, Menachemi N et al. A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States. Public Health Reports. 2006 Nov 1;121(6):737-745.
Beitsch, Leslie M. ; Kodolikar, Samata ; Stephens, Tim ; Shodell, Daniel ; Clawson, Art ; Menachemi, Nir ; Brooks, Robert G. / A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States. In: Public Health Reports. 2006 ; Vol. 121, No. 6. pp. 737-745.
@article{313b14f4b26b4443aff23b502bf802b1,
title = "A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States",
abstract = "Objectives. Given the national effort to respond to the challenge of terrorism post-9/11, this study examined the organizational structure of state public health preparedness programs across the country, their administration, and the personnel and resources supported through federal cooperative agreements and state funds. Methods. In Fall 2004, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials surveyed state public health preparedness directors of all 50 states and territories of the United States regarding the organizational structure, administration, personnel, and resources of the state public health preparedness programs. Results. Individuals representing 45 states and the District of Columbia responded to the web-based questionnaire for a response rate of 88.2{\%}. States tended to subdivide their organizations into regions for preparedness purposes. More than half the established preparedness regions (53.8{\%}) were created post-9/11. Preparedness program directors frequently reported directly to either the state health official (40.0{\%}) or a deputy state health official (33.3{\%}). Responsibility for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) cooperative agreements was predominantly vested in one person (73.3{\%}). Federal resources were found to support needed preparedness workforce (CDC mean=117.1 full-time equivalents [FTEs]; HRSA mean=10.6 FTEs). In addition, 36.6{\%} of the states also contributed to the public health preparedness budget. Conclusions. This study of state public health agency preparedness provides new information about state-level organizational structure, administration, and support of preparedness programs. It offers the first comprehensive insights into the approaches states have adopted to build infrastructure and develop capacity through CDC and HRSA funding streams.",
author = "Beitsch, {Leslie M.} and Samata Kodolikar and Tim Stephens and Daniel Shodell and Art Clawson and Nir Menachemi and Brooks, {Robert G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "737--745",
journal = "Public Health Reports",
issn = "0033-3549",
publisher = "Association of Schools of Public Health",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A state-based analysis of public health preparedness programs in the United States

AU - Beitsch, Leslie M.

AU - Kodolikar, Samata

AU - Stephens, Tim

AU - Shodell, Daniel

AU - Clawson, Art

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Brooks, Robert G.

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Objectives. Given the national effort to respond to the challenge of terrorism post-9/11, this study examined the organizational structure of state public health preparedness programs across the country, their administration, and the personnel and resources supported through federal cooperative agreements and state funds. Methods. In Fall 2004, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials surveyed state public health preparedness directors of all 50 states and territories of the United States regarding the organizational structure, administration, personnel, and resources of the state public health preparedness programs. Results. Individuals representing 45 states and the District of Columbia responded to the web-based questionnaire for a response rate of 88.2%. States tended to subdivide their organizations into regions for preparedness purposes. More than half the established preparedness regions (53.8%) were created post-9/11. Preparedness program directors frequently reported directly to either the state health official (40.0%) or a deputy state health official (33.3%). Responsibility for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) cooperative agreements was predominantly vested in one person (73.3%). Federal resources were found to support needed preparedness workforce (CDC mean=117.1 full-time equivalents [FTEs]; HRSA mean=10.6 FTEs). In addition, 36.6% of the states also contributed to the public health preparedness budget. Conclusions. This study of state public health agency preparedness provides new information about state-level organizational structure, administration, and support of preparedness programs. It offers the first comprehensive insights into the approaches states have adopted to build infrastructure and develop capacity through CDC and HRSA funding streams.

AB - Objectives. Given the national effort to respond to the challenge of terrorism post-9/11, this study examined the organizational structure of state public health preparedness programs across the country, their administration, and the personnel and resources supported through federal cooperative agreements and state funds. Methods. In Fall 2004, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials surveyed state public health preparedness directors of all 50 states and territories of the United States regarding the organizational structure, administration, personnel, and resources of the state public health preparedness programs. Results. Individuals representing 45 states and the District of Columbia responded to the web-based questionnaire for a response rate of 88.2%. States tended to subdivide their organizations into regions for preparedness purposes. More than half the established preparedness regions (53.8%) were created post-9/11. Preparedness program directors frequently reported directly to either the state health official (40.0%) or a deputy state health official (33.3%). Responsibility for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) cooperative agreements was predominantly vested in one person (73.3%). Federal resources were found to support needed preparedness workforce (CDC mean=117.1 full-time equivalents [FTEs]; HRSA mean=10.6 FTEs). In addition, 36.6% of the states also contributed to the public health preparedness budget. Conclusions. This study of state public health agency preparedness provides new information about state-level organizational structure, administration, and support of preparedness programs. It offers the first comprehensive insights into the approaches states have adopted to build infrastructure and develop capacity through CDC and HRSA funding streams.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847008730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847008730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 737

EP - 745

JO - Public Health Reports

JF - Public Health Reports

SN - 0033-3549

IS - 6

ER -