A statistical evaluation of microtensile bond strength methodology for dental adhesives

George J. Eckert, Jeffrey Platt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between beams from the same tooth in a microtensile bond strength study and to examine their effect on the interpretation of results. Methods: A flat occlusal dentin surface was exposed using wet 180, 240, and 320-grit SiC paper on caries-free human molar teeth. Adhesive was applied followed by 6 mm of composite (CoreRestore2) applied in 2 mm increments. Four adhesives were used: Optibond FL, light-cure, dual-cure, and self-cure Optibond Solo Plus. Nine beams (1 mm2) were obtained from fifteen teeth for each group, labeled to indicate the orientation of the beams to each other and stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 1 week or 3 months. Microtensile dentin bond strengths were determined using a non-trimming technique. Statistical comparisons between adhesive-storage combinations were performed using ANOVA. Analyses were performed assuming statistical independence between all beams and then repeated using a random tooth effect to account for correlations between beams from the same tooth. Results: Significant correlations were found between beams. No pattern was observed in the correlations related to the orientations of the beams to each other. Conclusions regarding statistical significance of comparisons (at alpha = 0.05) were sometimes affected by the incorrect assumption of independent beams. The degree of correlation was large enough to severely affect power and sample size calculations. Significance: Analyses of microtensile dentin bond strength studies need to account for correlations between beams to avoid over-stating statistical significance of study results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-391
Number of pages7
JournalDental Materials
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Dental Cements
Adhesives
Tooth
Dentin
Artificial Saliva
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Sample Size
Composite materials
Analysis of Variance
Light

Keywords

  • Adhesion
  • Adhesive incompatibility
  • Microtensile bond strength
  • Statistical methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A statistical evaluation of microtensile bond strength methodology for dental adhesives. / Eckert, George J.; Platt, Jeffrey.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03.2007, p. 385-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ff1044a839b4aa49bcad0403fb0d3f5,
title = "A statistical evaluation of microtensile bond strength methodology for dental adhesives",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between beams from the same tooth in a microtensile bond strength study and to examine their effect on the interpretation of results. Methods: A flat occlusal dentin surface was exposed using wet 180, 240, and 320-grit SiC paper on caries-free human molar teeth. Adhesive was applied followed by 6 mm of composite (CoreRestore2) applied in 2 mm increments. Four adhesives were used: Optibond FL, light-cure, dual-cure, and self-cure Optibond Solo Plus. Nine beams (1 mm2) were obtained from fifteen teeth for each group, labeled to indicate the orientation of the beams to each other and stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 1 week or 3 months. Microtensile dentin bond strengths were determined using a non-trimming technique. Statistical comparisons between adhesive-storage combinations were performed using ANOVA. Analyses were performed assuming statistical independence between all beams and then repeated using a random tooth effect to account for correlations between beams from the same tooth. Results: Significant correlations were found between beams. No pattern was observed in the correlations related to the orientations of the beams to each other. Conclusions regarding statistical significance of comparisons (at alpha = 0.05) were sometimes affected by the incorrect assumption of independent beams. The degree of correlation was large enough to severely affect power and sample size calculations. Significance: Analyses of microtensile dentin bond strength studies need to account for correlations between beams to avoid over-stating statistical significance of study results.",
keywords = "Adhesion, Adhesive incompatibility, Microtensile bond strength, Statistical methodology",
author = "Eckert, {George J.} and Jeffrey Platt",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "385--391",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A statistical evaluation of microtensile bond strength methodology for dental adhesives

AU - Eckert, George J.

AU - Platt, Jeffrey

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between beams from the same tooth in a microtensile bond strength study and to examine their effect on the interpretation of results. Methods: A flat occlusal dentin surface was exposed using wet 180, 240, and 320-grit SiC paper on caries-free human molar teeth. Adhesive was applied followed by 6 mm of composite (CoreRestore2) applied in 2 mm increments. Four adhesives were used: Optibond FL, light-cure, dual-cure, and self-cure Optibond Solo Plus. Nine beams (1 mm2) were obtained from fifteen teeth for each group, labeled to indicate the orientation of the beams to each other and stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 1 week or 3 months. Microtensile dentin bond strengths were determined using a non-trimming technique. Statistical comparisons between adhesive-storage combinations were performed using ANOVA. Analyses were performed assuming statistical independence between all beams and then repeated using a random tooth effect to account for correlations between beams from the same tooth. Results: Significant correlations were found between beams. No pattern was observed in the correlations related to the orientations of the beams to each other. Conclusions regarding statistical significance of comparisons (at alpha = 0.05) were sometimes affected by the incorrect assumption of independent beams. The degree of correlation was large enough to severely affect power and sample size calculations. Significance: Analyses of microtensile dentin bond strength studies need to account for correlations between beams to avoid over-stating statistical significance of study results.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between beams from the same tooth in a microtensile bond strength study and to examine their effect on the interpretation of results. Methods: A flat occlusal dentin surface was exposed using wet 180, 240, and 320-grit SiC paper on caries-free human molar teeth. Adhesive was applied followed by 6 mm of composite (CoreRestore2) applied in 2 mm increments. Four adhesives were used: Optibond FL, light-cure, dual-cure, and self-cure Optibond Solo Plus. Nine beams (1 mm2) were obtained from fifteen teeth for each group, labeled to indicate the orientation of the beams to each other and stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 1 week or 3 months. Microtensile dentin bond strengths were determined using a non-trimming technique. Statistical comparisons between adhesive-storage combinations were performed using ANOVA. Analyses were performed assuming statistical independence between all beams and then repeated using a random tooth effect to account for correlations between beams from the same tooth. Results: Significant correlations were found between beams. No pattern was observed in the correlations related to the orientations of the beams to each other. Conclusions regarding statistical significance of comparisons (at alpha = 0.05) were sometimes affected by the incorrect assumption of independent beams. The degree of correlation was large enough to severely affect power and sample size calculations. Significance: Analyses of microtensile dentin bond strength studies need to account for correlations between beams to avoid over-stating statistical significance of study results.

KW - Adhesion

KW - Adhesive incompatibility

KW - Microtensile bond strength

KW - Statistical methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846341491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846341491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.007

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 16540162

AN - SCOPUS:33846341491

VL - 23

SP - 385

EP - 391

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 3

ER -