A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data

Dean F. Sittig, Brian L. Hazlehurst, Jeffrey Brown, Shawn Murphy, Marc Rosenman, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch, Adam B. Wilcox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has the potential to transform the current health care delivery system by identifying the most effective medical and surgical treatments, diagnostic tests, disease prevention methods, and ways to deliver care for specific clinical conditions. To be successful, such research requires the identification, capture, aggregation, integration, and analysis of disparate data sources held by different institutions with diverse representations of the relevant clinical events. In an effort to address these diverse demands, there have been multiple new designs and implementations of informatics platforms that provide access to electronic clinical data and the governance infrastructure required for interinstitutional CER. The goal of this manuscript is to help investigators understand why these informatics platforms are required and to compare and contrast 6 large-scale, recently funded, CER-focused informatics platform development efforts. We utilized an 8-dimension, sociotechnical model of health information technology to help guide our work. We identified 6 generic steps that are necessary in any distributed, multi-institutional CER project: data identification, extraction, modeling, aggregation, analysis, and dissemination. We expect that over the next several years these projects will provide answers to many important, and heretofore unanswerable, clinical research questions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMedical Care
Volume50
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Comparative Effectiveness Research
Informatics
Clinical Governance
Delivery of Health Care
Medical Informatics
Information Storage and Retrieval
Research
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Comparative effectiveness research
  • Medical informatics
  • Methods
  • Organization and administration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data. / Sittig, Dean F.; Hazlehurst, Brian L.; Brown, Jeffrey; Murphy, Shawn; Rosenman, Marc; Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter; Wilcox, Adam B.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 50, No. SUPPL. 1, 07.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sittig, Dean F. ; Hazlehurst, Brian L. ; Brown, Jeffrey ; Murphy, Shawn ; Rosenman, Marc ; Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter ; Wilcox, Adam B. / A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data. In: Medical Care. 2012 ; Vol. 50, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{b1307603352843b2b020388c3b0a70ed,
title = "A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data",
abstract = "Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has the potential to transform the current health care delivery system by identifying the most effective medical and surgical treatments, diagnostic tests, disease prevention methods, and ways to deliver care for specific clinical conditions. To be successful, such research requires the identification, capture, aggregation, integration, and analysis of disparate data sources held by different institutions with diverse representations of the relevant clinical events. In an effort to address these diverse demands, there have been multiple new designs and implementations of informatics platforms that provide access to electronic clinical data and the governance infrastructure required for interinstitutional CER. The goal of this manuscript is to help investigators understand why these informatics platforms are required and to compare and contrast 6 large-scale, recently funded, CER-focused informatics platform development efforts. We utilized an 8-dimension, sociotechnical model of health information technology to help guide our work. We identified 6 generic steps that are necessary in any distributed, multi-institutional CER project: data identification, extraction, modeling, aggregation, analysis, and dissemination. We expect that over the next several years these projects will provide answers to many important, and heretofore unanswerable, clinical research questions.",
keywords = "Comparative effectiveness research, Medical informatics, Methods, Organization and administration",
author = "Sittig, {Dean F.} and Hazlehurst, {Brian L.} and Jeffrey Brown and Shawn Murphy and Marc Rosenman and Peter Tarczy-Hornoch and Wilcox, {Adam B.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c02b",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data

AU - Sittig, Dean F.

AU - Hazlehurst, Brian L.

AU - Brown, Jeffrey

AU - Murphy, Shawn

AU - Rosenman, Marc

AU - Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter

AU - Wilcox, Adam B.

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has the potential to transform the current health care delivery system by identifying the most effective medical and surgical treatments, diagnostic tests, disease prevention methods, and ways to deliver care for specific clinical conditions. To be successful, such research requires the identification, capture, aggregation, integration, and analysis of disparate data sources held by different institutions with diverse representations of the relevant clinical events. In an effort to address these diverse demands, there have been multiple new designs and implementations of informatics platforms that provide access to electronic clinical data and the governance infrastructure required for interinstitutional CER. The goal of this manuscript is to help investigators understand why these informatics platforms are required and to compare and contrast 6 large-scale, recently funded, CER-focused informatics platform development efforts. We utilized an 8-dimension, sociotechnical model of health information technology to help guide our work. We identified 6 generic steps that are necessary in any distributed, multi-institutional CER project: data identification, extraction, modeling, aggregation, analysis, and dissemination. We expect that over the next several years these projects will provide answers to many important, and heretofore unanswerable, clinical research questions.

AB - Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has the potential to transform the current health care delivery system by identifying the most effective medical and surgical treatments, diagnostic tests, disease prevention methods, and ways to deliver care for specific clinical conditions. To be successful, such research requires the identification, capture, aggregation, integration, and analysis of disparate data sources held by different institutions with diverse representations of the relevant clinical events. In an effort to address these diverse demands, there have been multiple new designs and implementations of informatics platforms that provide access to electronic clinical data and the governance infrastructure required for interinstitutional CER. The goal of this manuscript is to help investigators understand why these informatics platforms are required and to compare and contrast 6 large-scale, recently funded, CER-focused informatics platform development efforts. We utilized an 8-dimension, sociotechnical model of health information technology to help guide our work. We identified 6 generic steps that are necessary in any distributed, multi-institutional CER project: data identification, extraction, modeling, aggregation, analysis, and dissemination. We expect that over the next several years these projects will provide answers to many important, and heretofore unanswerable, clinical research questions.

KW - Comparative effectiveness research

KW - Medical informatics

KW - Methods

KW - Organization and administration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862279410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862279410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c02b

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c02b

M3 - Article

VL - 50

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -