A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers

Mulubrhan F. Mogos, Euna M. August, Abraham A. Salinas-Miranda, Dawood H. Sultan, Hamisu M. Salihu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quality of life has emerged as an essential health component that broadens the traditionally narrow concerns focused on only morbidity and life expectancy. Although a growing number of tools to measure quality of life are in circulation, there is a lack of guidelines as well as rigorous assessment for their use with pregnant and postpartum populations. It is also unclear whether these instruments could validly be employed to measure patient-reported outcomes in comparative effectiveness research of maternal care interventions. This paper reviews articles cited in CINAHL, COCHRANE, EMBASE, PSYCINFO, and PUBMED that addressed quality of life in pregnant and postpartum populations. Instruments used to measure quality of life in selected articles were assessed for their adherence to international guidelines for health outcomes instrument development and validation. The authors identified 129 articles that addressed quality of life in pregnant and/or postpartum women. Out of these, only 64 quality (generic and specific) scales were judged relevant to be included in this study. Analysis of measurement scales used in the pregnant and/or postpartum populations revealed important validity, reliability and psychometric inadequacies that negate their use in comparative effectiveness analysis in pregnant and post-partum populations. Valid, reliable, and responsive instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes in pregnant and postpartum populations are lacking. To demonstrate the effectiveness of various treatment and prevention programs, future research to develop and validate a robust and responsive quality of life measurement scale in pregnant and postpartum populations is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-250
Number of pages32
JournalApplied Research in Quality of Life
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

quality of life
life expectancy
health
morbidity
psychometrics
lack

Keywords

  • Health related quality of life
  • Measurement
  • Postpartum
  • Pregnancy
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Mogos, M. F., August, E. M., Salinas-Miranda, A. A., Sultan, D. H., & Salihu, H. M. (2013). A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 8(2), 219-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9188-4

A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers. / Mogos, Mulubrhan F.; August, Euna M.; Salinas-Miranda, Abraham A.; Sultan, Dawood H.; Salihu, Hamisu M.

In: Applied Research in Quality of Life, Vol. 8, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 219-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mogos, MF, August, EM, Salinas-Miranda, AA, Sultan, DH & Salihu, HM 2013, 'A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers', Applied Research in Quality of Life, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 219-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9188-4
Mogos, Mulubrhan F. ; August, Euna M. ; Salinas-Miranda, Abraham A. ; Sultan, Dawood H. ; Salihu, Hamisu M. / A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers. In: Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 219-250.
@article{176a2dd5eab848e480c5c72e7c681c9c,
title = "A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers",
abstract = "Quality of life has emerged as an essential health component that broadens the traditionally narrow concerns focused on only morbidity and life expectancy. Although a growing number of tools to measure quality of life are in circulation, there is a lack of guidelines as well as rigorous assessment for their use with pregnant and postpartum populations. It is also unclear whether these instruments could validly be employed to measure patient-reported outcomes in comparative effectiveness research of maternal care interventions. This paper reviews articles cited in CINAHL, COCHRANE, EMBASE, PSYCINFO, and PUBMED that addressed quality of life in pregnant and postpartum populations. Instruments used to measure quality of life in selected articles were assessed for their adherence to international guidelines for health outcomes instrument development and validation. The authors identified 129 articles that addressed quality of life in pregnant and/or postpartum women. Out of these, only 64 quality (generic and specific) scales were judged relevant to be included in this study. Analysis of measurement scales used in the pregnant and/or postpartum populations revealed important validity, reliability and psychometric inadequacies that negate their use in comparative effectiveness analysis in pregnant and post-partum populations. Valid, reliable, and responsive instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes in pregnant and postpartum populations are lacking. To demonstrate the effectiveness of various treatment and prevention programs, future research to develop and validate a robust and responsive quality of life measurement scale in pregnant and postpartum populations is needed.",
keywords = "Health related quality of life, Measurement, Postpartum, Pregnancy, Quality of life",
author = "Mogos, {Mulubrhan F.} and August, {Euna M.} and Salinas-Miranda, {Abraham A.} and Sultan, {Dawood H.} and Salihu, {Hamisu M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11482-012-9188-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "219--250",
journal = "Applied Research in Quality of Life",
issn = "1871-2584",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review of Quality of Life Measures in Pregnant and Postpartum Mothers

AU - Mogos, Mulubrhan F.

AU - August, Euna M.

AU - Salinas-Miranda, Abraham A.

AU - Sultan, Dawood H.

AU - Salihu, Hamisu M.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Quality of life has emerged as an essential health component that broadens the traditionally narrow concerns focused on only morbidity and life expectancy. Although a growing number of tools to measure quality of life are in circulation, there is a lack of guidelines as well as rigorous assessment for their use with pregnant and postpartum populations. It is also unclear whether these instruments could validly be employed to measure patient-reported outcomes in comparative effectiveness research of maternal care interventions. This paper reviews articles cited in CINAHL, COCHRANE, EMBASE, PSYCINFO, and PUBMED that addressed quality of life in pregnant and postpartum populations. Instruments used to measure quality of life in selected articles were assessed for their adherence to international guidelines for health outcomes instrument development and validation. The authors identified 129 articles that addressed quality of life in pregnant and/or postpartum women. Out of these, only 64 quality (generic and specific) scales were judged relevant to be included in this study. Analysis of measurement scales used in the pregnant and/or postpartum populations revealed important validity, reliability and psychometric inadequacies that negate their use in comparative effectiveness analysis in pregnant and post-partum populations. Valid, reliable, and responsive instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes in pregnant and postpartum populations are lacking. To demonstrate the effectiveness of various treatment and prevention programs, future research to develop and validate a robust and responsive quality of life measurement scale in pregnant and postpartum populations is needed.

AB - Quality of life has emerged as an essential health component that broadens the traditionally narrow concerns focused on only morbidity and life expectancy. Although a growing number of tools to measure quality of life are in circulation, there is a lack of guidelines as well as rigorous assessment for their use with pregnant and postpartum populations. It is also unclear whether these instruments could validly be employed to measure patient-reported outcomes in comparative effectiveness research of maternal care interventions. This paper reviews articles cited in CINAHL, COCHRANE, EMBASE, PSYCINFO, and PUBMED that addressed quality of life in pregnant and postpartum populations. Instruments used to measure quality of life in selected articles were assessed for their adherence to international guidelines for health outcomes instrument development and validation. The authors identified 129 articles that addressed quality of life in pregnant and/or postpartum women. Out of these, only 64 quality (generic and specific) scales were judged relevant to be included in this study. Analysis of measurement scales used in the pregnant and/or postpartum populations revealed important validity, reliability and psychometric inadequacies that negate their use in comparative effectiveness analysis in pregnant and post-partum populations. Valid, reliable, and responsive instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes in pregnant and postpartum populations are lacking. To demonstrate the effectiveness of various treatment and prevention programs, future research to develop and validate a robust and responsive quality of life measurement scale in pregnant and postpartum populations is needed.

KW - Health related quality of life

KW - Measurement

KW - Postpartum

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877596842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877596842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11482-012-9188-4

DO - 10.1007/s11482-012-9188-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877596842

VL - 8

SP - 219

EP - 250

JO - Applied Research in Quality of Life

JF - Applied Research in Quality of Life

SN - 1871-2584

IS - 2

ER -