A Systematic Review of Recall Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of Patients with Dental Restorations. Part 2: Implant-Borne Restorations

Avinash S. Bidra, Diane M. Daubert, Lily T. Garcia, Marissa F. Gauthier, Timothy F. Kosinski, Conrad A. Nenn, John A. Olsen, Jeffrey Platt, Susan S. Wingrove, Nancy Deal Chandler, Donald A. Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the current scientific evidence on patient recall and maintenance of implant-supported restorations, to standardize patient care regimens and improve maintenance of oral health. An additional purpose was to examine areas of deficiency in the current scientific literature and provide recommendations for future studies. Materials and Methods: An electronic search for articles in the English language literature from the past 10 years was performed independently by multiple investigators using a systematic search process. After application of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final list of articles was reviewed to meet the objectives of this review. Results: The initial electronic search resulted in 2816 titles. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 14 articles that satisfied the study objectives. An additional 6 articles were added through a supplemental search process for a total of 20 studies. Of these, 11 were randomized controlled clinical trials, and 9 were observational studies. The majority of the studies (15 out of 20) were conducted in the past 5 years and most studies were conducted in Europe (15), followed by Asia (2), South America (1), the United States (1), and the Middle East (1). Results from the qualitative data on a combined 1088 patients indicated that outcome improvements in recall and maintenance regimen were related to (1) patient/treatment characteristic (type of prosthesis, type of prosthetic components, and type of restorative materials); (2) specific oral topical agents or oral hygiene aids (electric toothbrush, interdental brush, chlorhexidine, triclosan, water flossers) and (3) professional intervention (oral hygiene maintenance, and maintenance of the prosthesis). Conclusions: There is minimal evidence related to recall regimens in patients with implant-borne removable and fixed restorations; however, a considerable body of evidence indicates that patients with implant-borne removable and fixed restorations require lifelong professional recall regimens to provide biological and mechanical maintenance, customized for each patient. Current evidence also demonstrates that the use of specific oral topical agents and oral hygiene aids can improve professional and at-home maintenance of implant-borne restorations. There is evidence to demonstrate differences in mechanical and biological maintenance needs due to differences in prosthetic materials and designs. Deficiencies in existing evidence compel the forethought of creating clinical practice guidelines for recall and maintenance of patients with implant-borne dental restorations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S16-S31
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
Volume25
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Tooth
Maintenance
Oral Hygiene
Prostheses and Implants
Triclosan
Literature
Chlorhexidine
Middle East
Dental Implants
South America
Oral Health
Practice Guidelines
Observational Studies
Patient Care
Language
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel
Water

Keywords

  • Implant-borne
  • Maintenance
  • Patient recall
  • Restorations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Bidra, A. S., Daubert, D. M., Garcia, L. T., Gauthier, M. F., Kosinski, T. F., Nenn, C. A., ... Curtis, D. A. (2016). A Systematic Review of Recall Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of Patients with Dental Restorations. Part 2: Implant-Borne Restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics, 25, S16-S31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12415

A Systematic Review of Recall Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of Patients with Dental Restorations. Part 2 : Implant-Borne Restorations. / Bidra, Avinash S.; Daubert, Diane M.; Garcia, Lily T.; Gauthier, Marissa F.; Kosinski, Timothy F.; Nenn, Conrad A.; Olsen, John A.; Platt, Jeffrey; Wingrove, Susan S.; Chandler, Nancy Deal; Curtis, Donald A.

In: Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 25, 01.01.2016, p. S16-S31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bidra, AS, Daubert, DM, Garcia, LT, Gauthier, MF, Kosinski, TF, Nenn, CA, Olsen, JA, Platt, J, Wingrove, SS, Chandler, ND & Curtis, DA 2016, 'A Systematic Review of Recall Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of Patients with Dental Restorations. Part 2: Implant-Borne Restorations', Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 25, pp. S16-S31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12415
Bidra, Avinash S. ; Daubert, Diane M. ; Garcia, Lily T. ; Gauthier, Marissa F. ; Kosinski, Timothy F. ; Nenn, Conrad A. ; Olsen, John A. ; Platt, Jeffrey ; Wingrove, Susan S. ; Chandler, Nancy Deal ; Curtis, Donald A. / A Systematic Review of Recall Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of Patients with Dental Restorations. Part 2 : Implant-Borne Restorations. In: Journal of Prosthodontics. 2016 ; Vol. 25. pp. S16-S31.
@article{f632ba4669444142918f3c414c9475bf,
title = "A Systematic Review of Recall Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of Patients with Dental Restorations. Part 2: Implant-Borne Restorations",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the current scientific evidence on patient recall and maintenance of implant-supported restorations, to standardize patient care regimens and improve maintenance of oral health. An additional purpose was to examine areas of deficiency in the current scientific literature and provide recommendations for future studies. Materials and Methods: An electronic search for articles in the English language literature from the past 10 years was performed independently by multiple investigators using a systematic search process. After application of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final list of articles was reviewed to meet the objectives of this review. Results: The initial electronic search resulted in 2816 titles. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 14 articles that satisfied the study objectives. An additional 6 articles were added through a supplemental search process for a total of 20 studies. Of these, 11 were randomized controlled clinical trials, and 9 were observational studies. The majority of the studies (15 out of 20) were conducted in the past 5 years and most studies were conducted in Europe (15), followed by Asia (2), South America (1), the United States (1), and the Middle East (1). Results from the qualitative data on a combined 1088 patients indicated that outcome improvements in recall and maintenance regimen were related to (1) patient/treatment characteristic (type of prosthesis, type of prosthetic components, and type of restorative materials); (2) specific oral topical agents or oral hygiene aids (electric toothbrush, interdental brush, chlorhexidine, triclosan, water flossers) and (3) professional intervention (oral hygiene maintenance, and maintenance of the prosthesis). Conclusions: There is minimal evidence related to recall regimens in patients with implant-borne removable and fixed restorations; however, a considerable body of evidence indicates that patients with implant-borne removable and fixed restorations require lifelong professional recall regimens to provide biological and mechanical maintenance, customized for each patient. Current evidence also demonstrates that the use of specific oral topical agents and oral hygiene aids can improve professional and at-home maintenance of implant-borne restorations. There is evidence to demonstrate differences in mechanical and biological maintenance needs due to differences in prosthetic materials and designs. Deficiencies in existing evidence compel the forethought of creating clinical practice guidelines for recall and maintenance of patients with implant-borne dental restorations.",
keywords = "Implant-borne, Maintenance, Patient recall, Restorations",
author = "Bidra, {Avinash S.} and Daubert, {Diane M.} and Garcia, {Lily T.} and Gauthier, {Marissa F.} and Kosinski, {Timothy F.} and Nenn, {Conrad A.} and Olsen, {John A.} and Jeffrey Platt and Wingrove, {Susan S.} and Chandler, {Nancy Deal} and Curtis, {Donald A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jopr.12415",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "S16--S31",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "1059-941X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review of Recall Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of Patients with Dental Restorations. Part 2

T2 - Implant-Borne Restorations

AU - Bidra, Avinash S.

AU - Daubert, Diane M.

AU - Garcia, Lily T.

AU - Gauthier, Marissa F.

AU - Kosinski, Timothy F.

AU - Nenn, Conrad A.

AU - Olsen, John A.

AU - Platt, Jeffrey

AU - Wingrove, Susan S.

AU - Chandler, Nancy Deal

AU - Curtis, Donald A.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the current scientific evidence on patient recall and maintenance of implant-supported restorations, to standardize patient care regimens and improve maintenance of oral health. An additional purpose was to examine areas of deficiency in the current scientific literature and provide recommendations for future studies. Materials and Methods: An electronic search for articles in the English language literature from the past 10 years was performed independently by multiple investigators using a systematic search process. After application of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final list of articles was reviewed to meet the objectives of this review. Results: The initial electronic search resulted in 2816 titles. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 14 articles that satisfied the study objectives. An additional 6 articles were added through a supplemental search process for a total of 20 studies. Of these, 11 were randomized controlled clinical trials, and 9 were observational studies. The majority of the studies (15 out of 20) were conducted in the past 5 years and most studies were conducted in Europe (15), followed by Asia (2), South America (1), the United States (1), and the Middle East (1). Results from the qualitative data on a combined 1088 patients indicated that outcome improvements in recall and maintenance regimen were related to (1) patient/treatment characteristic (type of prosthesis, type of prosthetic components, and type of restorative materials); (2) specific oral topical agents or oral hygiene aids (electric toothbrush, interdental brush, chlorhexidine, triclosan, water flossers) and (3) professional intervention (oral hygiene maintenance, and maintenance of the prosthesis). Conclusions: There is minimal evidence related to recall regimens in patients with implant-borne removable and fixed restorations; however, a considerable body of evidence indicates that patients with implant-borne removable and fixed restorations require lifelong professional recall regimens to provide biological and mechanical maintenance, customized for each patient. Current evidence also demonstrates that the use of specific oral topical agents and oral hygiene aids can improve professional and at-home maintenance of implant-borne restorations. There is evidence to demonstrate differences in mechanical and biological maintenance needs due to differences in prosthetic materials and designs. Deficiencies in existing evidence compel the forethought of creating clinical practice guidelines for recall and maintenance of patients with implant-borne dental restorations.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the current scientific evidence on patient recall and maintenance of implant-supported restorations, to standardize patient care regimens and improve maintenance of oral health. An additional purpose was to examine areas of deficiency in the current scientific literature and provide recommendations for future studies. Materials and Methods: An electronic search for articles in the English language literature from the past 10 years was performed independently by multiple investigators using a systematic search process. After application of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final list of articles was reviewed to meet the objectives of this review. Results: The initial electronic search resulted in 2816 titles. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 14 articles that satisfied the study objectives. An additional 6 articles were added through a supplemental search process for a total of 20 studies. Of these, 11 were randomized controlled clinical trials, and 9 were observational studies. The majority of the studies (15 out of 20) were conducted in the past 5 years and most studies were conducted in Europe (15), followed by Asia (2), South America (1), the United States (1), and the Middle East (1). Results from the qualitative data on a combined 1088 patients indicated that outcome improvements in recall and maintenance regimen were related to (1) patient/treatment characteristic (type of prosthesis, type of prosthetic components, and type of restorative materials); (2) specific oral topical agents or oral hygiene aids (electric toothbrush, interdental brush, chlorhexidine, triclosan, water flossers) and (3) professional intervention (oral hygiene maintenance, and maintenance of the prosthesis). Conclusions: There is minimal evidence related to recall regimens in patients with implant-borne removable and fixed restorations; however, a considerable body of evidence indicates that patients with implant-borne removable and fixed restorations require lifelong professional recall regimens to provide biological and mechanical maintenance, customized for each patient. Current evidence also demonstrates that the use of specific oral topical agents and oral hygiene aids can improve professional and at-home maintenance of implant-borne restorations. There is evidence to demonstrate differences in mechanical and biological maintenance needs due to differences in prosthetic materials and designs. Deficiencies in existing evidence compel the forethought of creating clinical practice guidelines for recall and maintenance of patients with implant-borne dental restorations.

KW - Implant-borne

KW - Maintenance

KW - Patient recall

KW - Restorations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951858804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951858804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopr.12415

DO - 10.1111/jopr.12415

M3 - Article

C2 - 26711217

AN - SCOPUS:84951858804

VL - 25

SP - S16-S31

JO - Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 1059-941X

ER -