A "Ton of Feathers"

Gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it

Phyllis L. Carr, Laura Szalacha, Rosalind Barnett, Cheryl Caswell, Thomas Inui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the experience of gender discrimination among a limited sample of women in academic medicine, specifically, the role of discrimination in hindering careers, coping mechanisms, and perceptions of what institutions and leaders of academic medicine can do to improve the professional workplace climate for women. Methods: In-depth, semistructured telephonic individual interviews of 18 women faculty who experienced or may have experienced discrimination in the course of their professional academic medical careers from 13 of the 24 institutions of the National Faculty Survey. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding. Themes expressed by multiple faculty were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Results: Forty percent of respondents ranked gender discrimination first out of 11 possible choices for hindering their career in academic medicine. Thirty-five percent ranked gender discrimination second to either "limited time for professional work" or "lack of mentoring." Respondents rated themselves as poorly prepared to deal with gender discrimination and noted effects on professional self-confidence, self-esteem, collegiality, isolation, and career satisfaction. The hierarchical structure in academe is perceived to work against women, as there are few women at the top. Women faculty who have experienced gender discrimination perceive that little can be done to directly address this issue. Institutions need to be proactive and recurrently evaluate the gender climate, as well as provide transparent information and fair scrutiny of promotion and salary decisions. Conclusions: According to this subset of women who perceive that they have been discriminated against based on gender, sexual bias and discrimination are subtly pervasive and powerful. Such environments may have consequences for both women faculty and academic medicine, affecting morale and dissuading younger trainees from entering academic careers. Medical schools need to evaluate and may need to improve the environment for women in academe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1009-1018
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of women's health (2002)
Volume12
Issue number10
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Feathers
Medicine
Climate
Morale
Discrimination (Psychology)
Sexism
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Medical Schools
Self Concept
Workplace
Consensus
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A "Ton of Feathers" : Gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it. / Carr, Phyllis L.; Szalacha, Laura; Barnett, Rosalind; Caswell, Cheryl; Inui, Thomas.

In: Journal of women's health (2002), Vol. 12, No. 10, 12.2003, p. 1009-1018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carr, PL, Szalacha, L, Barnett, R, Caswell, C & Inui, T 2003, 'A "Ton of Feathers": Gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it', Journal of women's health (2002), vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1009-1018.
Carr, Phyllis L. ; Szalacha, Laura ; Barnett, Rosalind ; Caswell, Cheryl ; Inui, Thomas. / A "Ton of Feathers" : Gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it. In: Journal of women's health (2002). 2003 ; Vol. 12, No. 10. pp. 1009-1018.
@article{516b1a90db3340db9a248afc75522d16,
title = "A {"}Ton of Feathers{"}: Gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the experience of gender discrimination among a limited sample of women in academic medicine, specifically, the role of discrimination in hindering careers, coping mechanisms, and perceptions of what institutions and leaders of academic medicine can do to improve the professional workplace climate for women. Methods: In-depth, semistructured telephonic individual interviews of 18 women faculty who experienced or may have experienced discrimination in the course of their professional academic medical careers from 13 of the 24 institutions of the National Faculty Survey. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding. Themes expressed by multiple faculty were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Results: Forty percent of respondents ranked gender discrimination first out of 11 possible choices for hindering their career in academic medicine. Thirty-five percent ranked gender discrimination second to either {"}limited time for professional work{"} or {"}lack of mentoring.{"} Respondents rated themselves as poorly prepared to deal with gender discrimination and noted effects on professional self-confidence, self-esteem, collegiality, isolation, and career satisfaction. The hierarchical structure in academe is perceived to work against women, as there are few women at the top. Women faculty who have experienced gender discrimination perceive that little can be done to directly address this issue. Institutions need to be proactive and recurrently evaluate the gender climate, as well as provide transparent information and fair scrutiny of promotion and salary decisions. Conclusions: According to this subset of women who perceive that they have been discriminated against based on gender, sexual bias and discrimination are subtly pervasive and powerful. Such environments may have consequences for both women faculty and academic medicine, affecting morale and dissuading younger trainees from entering academic careers. Medical schools need to evaluate and may need to improve the environment for women in academe.",
author = "Carr, {Phyllis L.} and Laura Szalacha and Rosalind Barnett and Cheryl Caswell and Thomas Inui",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1009--1018",
journal = "Journal of Women's Health",
issn = "1540-9996",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A "Ton of Feathers"

T2 - Gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it

AU - Carr, Phyllis L.

AU - Szalacha, Laura

AU - Barnett, Rosalind

AU - Caswell, Cheryl

AU - Inui, Thomas

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the experience of gender discrimination among a limited sample of women in academic medicine, specifically, the role of discrimination in hindering careers, coping mechanisms, and perceptions of what institutions and leaders of academic medicine can do to improve the professional workplace climate for women. Methods: In-depth, semistructured telephonic individual interviews of 18 women faculty who experienced or may have experienced discrimination in the course of their professional academic medical careers from 13 of the 24 institutions of the National Faculty Survey. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding. Themes expressed by multiple faculty were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Results: Forty percent of respondents ranked gender discrimination first out of 11 possible choices for hindering their career in academic medicine. Thirty-five percent ranked gender discrimination second to either "limited time for professional work" or "lack of mentoring." Respondents rated themselves as poorly prepared to deal with gender discrimination and noted effects on professional self-confidence, self-esteem, collegiality, isolation, and career satisfaction. The hierarchical structure in academe is perceived to work against women, as there are few women at the top. Women faculty who have experienced gender discrimination perceive that little can be done to directly address this issue. Institutions need to be proactive and recurrently evaluate the gender climate, as well as provide transparent information and fair scrutiny of promotion and salary decisions. Conclusions: According to this subset of women who perceive that they have been discriminated against based on gender, sexual bias and discrimination are subtly pervasive and powerful. Such environments may have consequences for both women faculty and academic medicine, affecting morale and dissuading younger trainees from entering academic careers. Medical schools need to evaluate and may need to improve the environment for women in academe.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the experience of gender discrimination among a limited sample of women in academic medicine, specifically, the role of discrimination in hindering careers, coping mechanisms, and perceptions of what institutions and leaders of academic medicine can do to improve the professional workplace climate for women. Methods: In-depth, semistructured telephonic individual interviews of 18 women faculty who experienced or may have experienced discrimination in the course of their professional academic medical careers from 13 of the 24 institutions of the National Faculty Survey. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding. Themes expressed by multiple faculty were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Results: Forty percent of respondents ranked gender discrimination first out of 11 possible choices for hindering their career in academic medicine. Thirty-five percent ranked gender discrimination second to either "limited time for professional work" or "lack of mentoring." Respondents rated themselves as poorly prepared to deal with gender discrimination and noted effects on professional self-confidence, self-esteem, collegiality, isolation, and career satisfaction. The hierarchical structure in academe is perceived to work against women, as there are few women at the top. Women faculty who have experienced gender discrimination perceive that little can be done to directly address this issue. Institutions need to be proactive and recurrently evaluate the gender climate, as well as provide transparent information and fair scrutiny of promotion and salary decisions. Conclusions: According to this subset of women who perceive that they have been discriminated against based on gender, sexual bias and discrimination are subtly pervasive and powerful. Such environments may have consequences for both women faculty and academic medicine, affecting morale and dissuading younger trainees from entering academic careers. Medical schools need to evaluate and may need to improve the environment for women in academe.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346025578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346025578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1009

EP - 1018

JO - Journal of Women's Health

JF - Journal of Women's Health

SN - 1540-9996

IS - 10

ER -