A usability evaluation of four commercial dental computer-based patient record systems

Thankam Paul Thyvalikakath, Valerie Monaco, Hima Bindu Thambuganipalle, Titus Schleyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The usability of dental computer-based patient record (CPR) systems has not been studied, despite early evidence that poor usability is a problem for dental CPR system users at multiple levels. Methods. The authors conducted formal usability tests of four dental CPR systems by using a purposive sample of four groups of five novice users. The authors measured task outcomes (correctly completed, incorrectly completed and incomplete) in each CPR system while the participants performed nine clinical documentation tasks, as well as the number of usability problems identified in each CPR system and their potential relationship to task outcomes. The authors reviewed the software application design aspects responsible for these usability problems. Results. The range for correctly completed tasks was 16 to 64 percent, for incorrectly completed tasks 18 to 38 percent and for incomplete tasks 9 to 47 percent. The authors identified 286 usability problems. The main types were three unsuccessful attempts, negative affect and task incorrectly completed. They also identified six problematic interface and interaction designs that led to usability problems. Conclusion. The four dental CPR systems studied have significant usability problems for novice users, resulting in a steep learning curve and potentially reduced system adoption. Clinical Implications. The significant number of data entry errors raises concerns about the quality of documentation in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1632-1642
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume139
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tooth
Documentation
Software Design
Learning Curve

Keywords

  • Clinical information systems
  • Computer-based patient records
  • Evaluation
  • Usability
  • User interface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A usability evaluation of four commercial dental computer-based patient record systems. / Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul; Monaco, Valerie; Thambuganipalle, Hima Bindu; Schleyer, Titus.

In: Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 139, No. 12, 12.2008, p. 1632-1642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dc8b38bc306844dba9b654183de06ae6,
title = "A usability evaluation of four commercial dental computer-based patient record systems",
abstract = "Background. The usability of dental computer-based patient record (CPR) systems has not been studied, despite early evidence that poor usability is a problem for dental CPR system users at multiple levels. Methods. The authors conducted formal usability tests of four dental CPR systems by using a purposive sample of four groups of five novice users. The authors measured task outcomes (correctly completed, incorrectly completed and incomplete) in each CPR system while the participants performed nine clinical documentation tasks, as well as the number of usability problems identified in each CPR system and their potential relationship to task outcomes. The authors reviewed the software application design aspects responsible for these usability problems. Results. The range for correctly completed tasks was 16 to 64 percent, for incorrectly completed tasks 18 to 38 percent and for incomplete tasks 9 to 47 percent. The authors identified 286 usability problems. The main types were three unsuccessful attempts, negative affect and task incorrectly completed. They also identified six problematic interface and interaction designs that led to usability problems. Conclusion. The four dental CPR systems studied have significant usability problems for novice users, resulting in a steep learning curve and potentially reduced system adoption. Clinical Implications. The significant number of data entry errors raises concerns about the quality of documentation in clinical practice.",
keywords = "Clinical information systems, Computer-based patient records, Evaluation, Usability, User interface",
author = "Thyvalikakath, {Thankam Paul} and Valerie Monaco and Thambuganipalle, {Hima Bindu} and Titus Schleyer",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "1632--1642",
journal = "Journal of the American Dental Association",
issn = "0002-8177",
publisher = "American Dental Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A usability evaluation of four commercial dental computer-based patient record systems

AU - Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul

AU - Monaco, Valerie

AU - Thambuganipalle, Hima Bindu

AU - Schleyer, Titus

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Background. The usability of dental computer-based patient record (CPR) systems has not been studied, despite early evidence that poor usability is a problem for dental CPR system users at multiple levels. Methods. The authors conducted formal usability tests of four dental CPR systems by using a purposive sample of four groups of five novice users. The authors measured task outcomes (correctly completed, incorrectly completed and incomplete) in each CPR system while the participants performed nine clinical documentation tasks, as well as the number of usability problems identified in each CPR system and their potential relationship to task outcomes. The authors reviewed the software application design aspects responsible for these usability problems. Results. The range for correctly completed tasks was 16 to 64 percent, for incorrectly completed tasks 18 to 38 percent and for incomplete tasks 9 to 47 percent. The authors identified 286 usability problems. The main types were three unsuccessful attempts, negative affect and task incorrectly completed. They also identified six problematic interface and interaction designs that led to usability problems. Conclusion. The four dental CPR systems studied have significant usability problems for novice users, resulting in a steep learning curve and potentially reduced system adoption. Clinical Implications. The significant number of data entry errors raises concerns about the quality of documentation in clinical practice.

AB - Background. The usability of dental computer-based patient record (CPR) systems has not been studied, despite early evidence that poor usability is a problem for dental CPR system users at multiple levels. Methods. The authors conducted formal usability tests of four dental CPR systems by using a purposive sample of four groups of five novice users. The authors measured task outcomes (correctly completed, incorrectly completed and incomplete) in each CPR system while the participants performed nine clinical documentation tasks, as well as the number of usability problems identified in each CPR system and their potential relationship to task outcomes. The authors reviewed the software application design aspects responsible for these usability problems. Results. The range for correctly completed tasks was 16 to 64 percent, for incorrectly completed tasks 18 to 38 percent and for incomplete tasks 9 to 47 percent. The authors identified 286 usability problems. The main types were three unsuccessful attempts, negative affect and task incorrectly completed. They also identified six problematic interface and interaction designs that led to usability problems. Conclusion. The four dental CPR systems studied have significant usability problems for novice users, resulting in a steep learning curve and potentially reduced system adoption. Clinical Implications. The significant number of data entry errors raises concerns about the quality of documentation in clinical practice.

KW - Clinical information systems

KW - Computer-based patient records

KW - Evaluation

KW - Usability

KW - User interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149218071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149218071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19047669

AN - SCOPUS:58149218071

VL - 139

SP - 1632

EP - 1642

JO - Journal of the American Dental Association

JF - Journal of the American Dental Association

SN - 0002-8177

IS - 12

ER -