A Web-based Generalist-Specialist System to Improve Scheduling of Outpatient Specialty Consultations in an Academic Center

Michael Weiner, Georges El Hoyek, Lynnette Wang, Paul R. Dexter, Ann D. Zerr, Anthony J. Perkins, Felgrace James, Rattan Juneja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failed referrals for specialty care are common and often represent medical errors. Technological structures and processes account for many failures. Scheduling appointments for subspecialty evaluation is a first step in outpatient referral and consultation. OBJECTIVE: We determined whether moving from paper-based referrals to a Web-based system with automated tracking features was associated with greater scheduling of appointments among referred patients. DESIGN: Staggered implementation of a quality-improvement project, with comparison of intervention and control groups. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 21 or more years of age referred from any of 11 primary-care clinics to any of 25 specialty clinics. INTERVENTIONS: Faxed referrals were replaced by a Web-based application shared by generalists and specialists, with enhanced communications and automated notification to the specialty office. MEASUREMENTS: We compared scheduling before and after implementation and time from referral to appointment. A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics. MAIN RESULTS: Among 40,487 referrals, 54% led to scheduled specialty visits before intervention, compared to 83% with intervention. The median time to appointment was 168 days without intervention and 78 days with intervention. Scheduling increased more when duplicate referrals were not generated (54% for single orders, 24% for multiple orders). After adjustment, referrals with the intervention were more than twice as likely to have scheduled visits. CONCLUSIONS: With a new Web-based referrals system, referrals were more than twice as likely to lead to a scheduled visit. This system improves access to specialty medical services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)710-715
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Outpatients
Referral and Consultation
Appointments and Schedules
Social Adjustment
Medical Errors
Quality Improvement
Primary Health Care
Logistic Models
Communication
Regression Analysis
Medicine
Demography
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Ambulatory care
  • Information systems
  • Referral and consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

A Web-based Generalist-Specialist System to Improve Scheduling of Outpatient Specialty Consultations in an Academic Center. / Weiner, Michael; El Hoyek, Georges; Wang, Lynnette; Dexter, Paul R.; Zerr, Ann D.; Perkins, Anthony J.; James, Felgrace; Juneja, Rattan.

In: Journal of general internal medicine, Vol. 24, No. 6, 01.06.2009, p. 710-715.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weiner, Michael ; El Hoyek, Georges ; Wang, Lynnette ; Dexter, Paul R. ; Zerr, Ann D. ; Perkins, Anthony J. ; James, Felgrace ; Juneja, Rattan. / A Web-based Generalist-Specialist System to Improve Scheduling of Outpatient Specialty Consultations in an Academic Center. In: Journal of general internal medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 710-715.
@article{1cf6c84a48d84adb95e99e35cdbdc494,
title = "A Web-based Generalist-Specialist System to Improve Scheduling of Outpatient Specialty Consultations in an Academic Center",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Failed referrals for specialty care are common and often represent medical errors. Technological structures and processes account for many failures. Scheduling appointments for subspecialty evaluation is a first step in outpatient referral and consultation. OBJECTIVE: We determined whether moving from paper-based referrals to a Web-based system with automated tracking features was associated with greater scheduling of appointments among referred patients. DESIGN: Staggered implementation of a quality-improvement project, with comparison of intervention and control groups. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 21 or more years of age referred from any of 11 primary-care clinics to any of 25 specialty clinics. INTERVENTIONS: Faxed referrals were replaced by a Web-based application shared by generalists and specialists, with enhanced communications and automated notification to the specialty office. MEASUREMENTS: We compared scheduling before and after implementation and time from referral to appointment. A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics. MAIN RESULTS: Among 40,487 referrals, 54{\%} led to scheduled specialty visits before intervention, compared to 83{\%} with intervention. The median time to appointment was 168 days without intervention and 78 days with intervention. Scheduling increased more when duplicate referrals were not generated (54{\%} for single orders, 24{\%} for multiple orders). After adjustment, referrals with the intervention were more than twice as likely to have scheduled visits. CONCLUSIONS: With a new Web-based referrals system, referrals were more than twice as likely to lead to a scheduled visit. This system improves access to specialty medical services.",
keywords = "Ambulatory care, Information systems, Referral and consultation",
author = "Michael Weiner and {El Hoyek}, Georges and Lynnette Wang and Dexter, {Paul R.} and Zerr, {Ann D.} and Perkins, {Anthony J.} and Felgrace James and Rattan Juneja",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-009-0971-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "710--715",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Web-based Generalist-Specialist System to Improve Scheduling of Outpatient Specialty Consultations in an Academic Center

AU - Weiner, Michael

AU - El Hoyek, Georges

AU - Wang, Lynnette

AU - Dexter, Paul R.

AU - Zerr, Ann D.

AU - Perkins, Anthony J.

AU - James, Felgrace

AU - Juneja, Rattan

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Failed referrals for specialty care are common and often represent medical errors. Technological structures and processes account for many failures. Scheduling appointments for subspecialty evaluation is a first step in outpatient referral and consultation. OBJECTIVE: We determined whether moving from paper-based referrals to a Web-based system with automated tracking features was associated with greater scheduling of appointments among referred patients. DESIGN: Staggered implementation of a quality-improvement project, with comparison of intervention and control groups. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 21 or more years of age referred from any of 11 primary-care clinics to any of 25 specialty clinics. INTERVENTIONS: Faxed referrals were replaced by a Web-based application shared by generalists and specialists, with enhanced communications and automated notification to the specialty office. MEASUREMENTS: We compared scheduling before and after implementation and time from referral to appointment. A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics. MAIN RESULTS: Among 40,487 referrals, 54% led to scheduled specialty visits before intervention, compared to 83% with intervention. The median time to appointment was 168 days without intervention and 78 days with intervention. Scheduling increased more when duplicate referrals were not generated (54% for single orders, 24% for multiple orders). After adjustment, referrals with the intervention were more than twice as likely to have scheduled visits. CONCLUSIONS: With a new Web-based referrals system, referrals were more than twice as likely to lead to a scheduled visit. This system improves access to specialty medical services.

AB - BACKGROUND: Failed referrals for specialty care are common and often represent medical errors. Technological structures and processes account for many failures. Scheduling appointments for subspecialty evaluation is a first step in outpatient referral and consultation. OBJECTIVE: We determined whether moving from paper-based referrals to a Web-based system with automated tracking features was associated with greater scheduling of appointments among referred patients. DESIGN: Staggered implementation of a quality-improvement project, with comparison of intervention and control groups. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 21 or more years of age referred from any of 11 primary-care clinics to any of 25 specialty clinics. INTERVENTIONS: Faxed referrals were replaced by a Web-based application shared by generalists and specialists, with enhanced communications and automated notification to the specialty office. MEASUREMENTS: We compared scheduling before and after implementation and time from referral to appointment. A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics. MAIN RESULTS: Among 40,487 referrals, 54% led to scheduled specialty visits before intervention, compared to 83% with intervention. The median time to appointment was 168 days without intervention and 78 days with intervention. Scheduling increased more when duplicate referrals were not generated (54% for single orders, 24% for multiple orders). After adjustment, referrals with the intervention were more than twice as likely to have scheduled visits. CONCLUSIONS: With a new Web-based referrals system, referrals were more than twice as likely to lead to a scheduled visit. This system improves access to specialty medical services.

KW - Ambulatory care

KW - Information systems

KW - Referral and consultation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349204519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349204519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-009-0971-3

DO - 10.1007/s11606-009-0971-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 19367375

AN - SCOPUS:67349204519

VL - 24

SP - 710

EP - 715

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 6

ER -