Abstinence and abstinence-only education

Mary Ott, John S. Santelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent literature on medical accuracy, program effectiveness, and ethical concerns related to abstinence-only policies for adolescent sexuality education. RECENT FINDINGS: The federal government invests over 175 million dollars annually in 'abstinence-only-until-marriage' programs. These programs are required to withhold information on contraception and condom use, except for information on failure rates. Abstinence-only curricula have been found to contain scientifically inaccurate information, distorting data on topics such as condom efficacy, and promote gender stereotypes. An independent evaluation of the federal program, several systematic reviews, and cohort data from population-based surveys find little evidence of efficacy and evidence of possible harm. In contrast, comprehensive sexuality education programs have been found to help teens delay initiation of intercourse and reduce sexual risk behaviors. Abstinence-only polices violate the human rights of adolescents because they withhold potentially life-saving information on HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. SUMMARY: Federal support of abstinence-only as an approach to adolescent sexuality education is of much concern due to medical inaccuracies, lack of effectiveness, and the withholding and distorting of health information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)446-452
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Sexuality
Education
Program Evaluation
Condoms
Federal Government
Police
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Risk-Taking
Marriage
Contraception
Sexual Behavior
Curriculum
HIV
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Abstinence
  • Human rights
  • Medical accuracy
  • Policy
  • Sex education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Abstinence and abstinence-only education. / Ott, Mary; Santelli, John S.

In: Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 10.2007, p. 446-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ott, Mary ; Santelli, John S. / Abstinence and abstinence-only education. In: Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 446-452.
@article{46681e5b0eeb48198d693fb3e2962ac5,
title = "Abstinence and abstinence-only education",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent literature on medical accuracy, program effectiveness, and ethical concerns related to abstinence-only policies for adolescent sexuality education. RECENT FINDINGS: The federal government invests over 175 million dollars annually in 'abstinence-only-until-marriage' programs. These programs are required to withhold information on contraception and condom use, except for information on failure rates. Abstinence-only curricula have been found to contain scientifically inaccurate information, distorting data on topics such as condom efficacy, and promote gender stereotypes. An independent evaluation of the federal program, several systematic reviews, and cohort data from population-based surveys find little evidence of efficacy and evidence of possible harm. In contrast, comprehensive sexuality education programs have been found to help teens delay initiation of intercourse and reduce sexual risk behaviors. Abstinence-only polices violate the human rights of adolescents because they withhold potentially life-saving information on HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. SUMMARY: Federal support of abstinence-only as an approach to adolescent sexuality education is of much concern due to medical inaccuracies, lack of effectiveness, and the withholding and distorting of health information.",
keywords = "Abstinence, Human rights, Medical accuracy, Policy, Sex education",
author = "Mary Ott and Santelli, {John S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282efdc0b",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "446--452",
journal = "Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "1040-872X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abstinence and abstinence-only education

AU - Ott, Mary

AU - Santelli, John S.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent literature on medical accuracy, program effectiveness, and ethical concerns related to abstinence-only policies for adolescent sexuality education. RECENT FINDINGS: The federal government invests over 175 million dollars annually in 'abstinence-only-until-marriage' programs. These programs are required to withhold information on contraception and condom use, except for information on failure rates. Abstinence-only curricula have been found to contain scientifically inaccurate information, distorting data on topics such as condom efficacy, and promote gender stereotypes. An independent evaluation of the federal program, several systematic reviews, and cohort data from population-based surveys find little evidence of efficacy and evidence of possible harm. In contrast, comprehensive sexuality education programs have been found to help teens delay initiation of intercourse and reduce sexual risk behaviors. Abstinence-only polices violate the human rights of adolescents because they withhold potentially life-saving information on HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. SUMMARY: Federal support of abstinence-only as an approach to adolescent sexuality education is of much concern due to medical inaccuracies, lack of effectiveness, and the withholding and distorting of health information.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent literature on medical accuracy, program effectiveness, and ethical concerns related to abstinence-only policies for adolescent sexuality education. RECENT FINDINGS: The federal government invests over 175 million dollars annually in 'abstinence-only-until-marriage' programs. These programs are required to withhold information on contraception and condom use, except for information on failure rates. Abstinence-only curricula have been found to contain scientifically inaccurate information, distorting data on topics such as condom efficacy, and promote gender stereotypes. An independent evaluation of the federal program, several systematic reviews, and cohort data from population-based surveys find little evidence of efficacy and evidence of possible harm. In contrast, comprehensive sexuality education programs have been found to help teens delay initiation of intercourse and reduce sexual risk behaviors. Abstinence-only polices violate the human rights of adolescents because they withhold potentially life-saving information on HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. SUMMARY: Federal support of abstinence-only as an approach to adolescent sexuality education is of much concern due to medical inaccuracies, lack of effectiveness, and the withholding and distorting of health information.

KW - Abstinence

KW - Human rights

KW - Medical accuracy

KW - Policy

KW - Sex education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34648860574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34648860574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282efdc0b

DO - 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282efdc0b

M3 - Article

C2 - 17885460

AN - SCOPUS:34648860574

VL - 19

SP - 446

EP - 452

JO - Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 1040-872X

IS - 5

ER -