Academic Productivity of US Cardiothoracic Surgical Centers

Carlo Maria Rosati, Panos N. Vardas, Mario Gaudino, Mohammad T. Tahboub, David Blitzer, Leonard N. Girardi, Mark Turrentine, John Brown, Leonidas Koniaris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aim: We investigated which metrics represent valid correlates of the academic productivity of cardiothoracic (CT) surgical centers. Methods: We collected data from 57 US academic CT surgical groups (663 surgeons), including H index and institutional role of each surgeon, ranking by US News & World Report (USNWR) and NIH funding, and designation as department versus division. Results: Academic productivity (median H-index of each group) was significantly different across institutions (p < 0.001). Several USNWR hospital categories (“Honor Roll”, “Adult Cardiology and Heart Surgery”, “Adult Pulmonology”, “Adult Cancer”) and medical school ranking for research were associated with differences in academic productivity, while ranking by NIH funding or designation as department versus division was not. Groups with chairperson's individual H-index ≥50 were overall more productive than those with chairperson's H-index <50 (median H-index: 18 vs. 14; p = 0.005). Conclusions: USNWR rankings provide a good representation of academic productivity, while NIH funding ranking or designation as department versus division does not. The individual productivity of the chairperson is correlated with that of the whole group. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12773 (J Card Surg 2016;31:423–428).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-428
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cardiac Surgery
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Medicine
Cardiology
Medical Schools
Thoracic Surgery
Research
Neoplasms
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Rosati, C. M., Vardas, P. N., Gaudino, M., Tahboub, M. T., Blitzer, D., Girardi, L. N., ... Koniaris, L. (2016). Academic Productivity of US Cardiothoracic Surgical Centers. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 31(7), 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12773

Academic Productivity of US Cardiothoracic Surgical Centers. / Rosati, Carlo Maria; Vardas, Panos N.; Gaudino, Mario; Tahboub, Mohammad T.; Blitzer, David; Girardi, Leonard N.; Turrentine, Mark; Brown, John; Koniaris, Leonidas.

In: Journal of Cardiac Surgery, Vol. 31, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 423-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosati, CM, Vardas, PN, Gaudino, M, Tahboub, MT, Blitzer, D, Girardi, LN, Turrentine, M, Brown, J & Koniaris, L 2016, 'Academic Productivity of US Cardiothoracic Surgical Centers', Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12773
Rosati CM, Vardas PN, Gaudino M, Tahboub MT, Blitzer D, Girardi LN et al. Academic Productivity of US Cardiothoracic Surgical Centers. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2016 Jul 1;31(7):423-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12773
Rosati, Carlo Maria ; Vardas, Panos N. ; Gaudino, Mario ; Tahboub, Mohammad T. ; Blitzer, David ; Girardi, Leonard N. ; Turrentine, Mark ; Brown, John ; Koniaris, Leonidas. / Academic Productivity of US Cardiothoracic Surgical Centers. In: Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 423-428.
@article{9370826e8cfd4741b287d256c801f6d7,
title = "Academic Productivity of US Cardiothoracic Surgical Centers",
abstract = "Background and Aim: We investigated which metrics represent valid correlates of the academic productivity of cardiothoracic (CT) surgical centers. Methods: We collected data from 57 US academic CT surgical groups (663 surgeons), including H index and institutional role of each surgeon, ranking by US News & World Report (USNWR) and NIH funding, and designation as department versus division. Results: Academic productivity (median H-index of each group) was significantly different across institutions (p < 0.001). Several USNWR hospital categories (“Honor Roll”, “Adult Cardiology and Heart Surgery”, “Adult Pulmonology”, “Adult Cancer”) and medical school ranking for research were associated with differences in academic productivity, while ranking by NIH funding or designation as department versus division was not. Groups with chairperson's individual H-index ≥50 were overall more productive than those with chairperson's H-index <50 (median H-index: 18 vs. 14; p = 0.005). Conclusions: USNWR rankings provide a good representation of academic productivity, while NIH funding ranking or designation as department versus division does not. The individual productivity of the chairperson is correlated with that of the whole group. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12773 (J Card Surg 2016;31:423–428).",
author = "Rosati, {Carlo Maria} and Vardas, {Panos N.} and Mario Gaudino and Tahboub, {Mohammad T.} and David Blitzer and Girardi, {Leonard N.} and Mark Turrentine and John Brown and Leonidas Koniaris",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocs.12773",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "423--428",
journal = "Journal of Cardiac Surgery",
issn = "0886-0440",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Academic Productivity of US Cardiothoracic Surgical Centers

AU - Rosati, Carlo Maria

AU - Vardas, Panos N.

AU - Gaudino, Mario

AU - Tahboub, Mohammad T.

AU - Blitzer, David

AU - Girardi, Leonard N.

AU - Turrentine, Mark

AU - Brown, John

AU - Koniaris, Leonidas

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Background and Aim: We investigated which metrics represent valid correlates of the academic productivity of cardiothoracic (CT) surgical centers. Methods: We collected data from 57 US academic CT surgical groups (663 surgeons), including H index and institutional role of each surgeon, ranking by US News & World Report (USNWR) and NIH funding, and designation as department versus division. Results: Academic productivity (median H-index of each group) was significantly different across institutions (p < 0.001). Several USNWR hospital categories (“Honor Roll”, “Adult Cardiology and Heart Surgery”, “Adult Pulmonology”, “Adult Cancer”) and medical school ranking for research were associated with differences in academic productivity, while ranking by NIH funding or designation as department versus division was not. Groups with chairperson's individual H-index ≥50 were overall more productive than those with chairperson's H-index <50 (median H-index: 18 vs. 14; p = 0.005). Conclusions: USNWR rankings provide a good representation of academic productivity, while NIH funding ranking or designation as department versus division does not. The individual productivity of the chairperson is correlated with that of the whole group. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12773 (J Card Surg 2016;31:423–428).

AB - Background and Aim: We investigated which metrics represent valid correlates of the academic productivity of cardiothoracic (CT) surgical centers. Methods: We collected data from 57 US academic CT surgical groups (663 surgeons), including H index and institutional role of each surgeon, ranking by US News & World Report (USNWR) and NIH funding, and designation as department versus division. Results: Academic productivity (median H-index of each group) was significantly different across institutions (p < 0.001). Several USNWR hospital categories (“Honor Roll”, “Adult Cardiology and Heart Surgery”, “Adult Pulmonology”, “Adult Cancer”) and medical school ranking for research were associated with differences in academic productivity, while ranking by NIH funding or designation as department versus division was not. Groups with chairperson's individual H-index ≥50 were overall more productive than those with chairperson's H-index <50 (median H-index: 18 vs. 14; p = 0.005). Conclusions: USNWR rankings provide a good representation of academic productivity, while NIH funding ranking or designation as department versus division does not. The individual productivity of the chairperson is correlated with that of the whole group. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12773 (J Card Surg 2016;31:423–428).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977526619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977526619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocs.12773

DO - 10.1111/jocs.12773

M3 - Article

C2 - 27278079

AN - SCOPUS:84977526619

VL - 31

SP - 423

EP - 428

JO - Journal of Cardiac Surgery

JF - Journal of Cardiac Surgery

SN - 0886-0440

IS - 7

ER -