Acceptability and Feasibility of a Meaning-Based Intervention for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Spouses

A Pilot Study

Christina D. Wagner, Shelley Johns, Linda F. Brown, Nasser Hanna, Silvia Bigatti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Constructing meaning in cancer leads to improved psychosocial outcomes for patients and survivors. Aim: We tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a meaning-based intervention for couples. Design: The single-arm pilot study tested a 4-session, tailored, activities-based couple’s intervention. Setting/Participants: Twelve adults with incurable cancer and their partners participated either in a university office or at the couple’s home. Results: The study showed good feasibility. One of the two patients depressed at baseline was no longer depressed at postintervention. Patients’ threat appraisals decreased and transcendence increased. In partners, depression, anxiety, and challenge appraisal decreased; threat and secondary appraisals and peace with illness increased. Conclusions: Our findings suggest feasibility and efficacy, and further research and continued evaluation of this intervention are warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)546-554
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Spouses
Neoplasms
Survivors
Anxiety
Depression

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • couples focus
  • depression
  • end of life
  • meaning-making intervention
  • transcendental concerns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{17f6223a965b4f19b6e5d8cbb2a75e8f,
title = "Acceptability and Feasibility of a Meaning-Based Intervention for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Spouses: A Pilot Study",
abstract = "Background: Constructing meaning in cancer leads to improved psychosocial outcomes for patients and survivors. Aim: We tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a meaning-based intervention for couples. Design: The single-arm pilot study tested a 4-session, tailored, activities-based couple’s intervention. Setting/Participants: Twelve adults with incurable cancer and their partners participated either in a university office or at the couple’s home. Results: The study showed good feasibility. One of the two patients depressed at baseline was no longer depressed at postintervention. Patients’ threat appraisals decreased and transcendence increased. In partners, depression, anxiety, and challenge appraisal decreased; threat and secondary appraisals and peace with illness increased. Conclusions: Our findings suggest feasibility and efficacy, and further research and continued evaluation of this intervention are warranted.",
keywords = "anxiety, couples focus, depression, end of life, meaning-making intervention, transcendental concerns",
author = "Wagner, {Christina D.} and Shelley Johns and Brown, {Linda F.} and Nasser Hanna and Silvia Bigatti",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049909115575709",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "546--554",
journal = "American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1049-9091",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability and Feasibility of a Meaning-Based Intervention for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Spouses

T2 - A Pilot Study

AU - Wagner, Christina D.

AU - Johns, Shelley

AU - Brown, Linda F.

AU - Hanna, Nasser

AU - Bigatti, Silvia

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Background: Constructing meaning in cancer leads to improved psychosocial outcomes for patients and survivors. Aim: We tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a meaning-based intervention for couples. Design: The single-arm pilot study tested a 4-session, tailored, activities-based couple’s intervention. Setting/Participants: Twelve adults with incurable cancer and their partners participated either in a university office or at the couple’s home. Results: The study showed good feasibility. One of the two patients depressed at baseline was no longer depressed at postintervention. Patients’ threat appraisals decreased and transcendence increased. In partners, depression, anxiety, and challenge appraisal decreased; threat and secondary appraisals and peace with illness increased. Conclusions: Our findings suggest feasibility and efficacy, and further research and continued evaluation of this intervention are warranted.

AB - Background: Constructing meaning in cancer leads to improved psychosocial outcomes for patients and survivors. Aim: We tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a meaning-based intervention for couples. Design: The single-arm pilot study tested a 4-session, tailored, activities-based couple’s intervention. Setting/Participants: Twelve adults with incurable cancer and their partners participated either in a university office or at the couple’s home. Results: The study showed good feasibility. One of the two patients depressed at baseline was no longer depressed at postintervention. Patients’ threat appraisals decreased and transcendence increased. In partners, depression, anxiety, and challenge appraisal decreased; threat and secondary appraisals and peace with illness increased. Conclusions: Our findings suggest feasibility and efficacy, and further research and continued evaluation of this intervention are warranted.

KW - anxiety

KW - couples focus

KW - depression

KW - end of life

KW - meaning-making intervention

KW - transcendental concerns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971601392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971601392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049909115575709

DO - 10.1177/1049909115575709

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 546

EP - 554

JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

SN - 1049-9091

IS - 6

ER -