Access to communication technologies in a sample of cancer patients: An urban and rural survey

Ma'n Abdullah, Dale E. Theobald, Donna Butler, Kurt Kroenke, Anthony Perkins, Sara Edgerton, William M. Dugan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a growing awareness among providers of the symptom burden experienced by cancer patients. Systematic symptom screening is difficult. Our plan was to evaluate a technology-based symptom screening process using touch-tone telephone and Internet in our rural outreach cancer program in Indiana. Would rural patients have adequate access to technologies for home-based symptom reporting? Objectives: 1) To determine access to touch-tone telephone service and Internet for patients in urban and rural clinics; 2) to determine barriers to access; 3) to determine willingness to use technology for home-based symptom reporting. Methods: Patients from representative clinics (seven rural and three urban) in our network were surveyed. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 18, able to read, and diagnosis of malignancy. Results: The response rate was 97%. Of 416 patients completing the survey (230 rural, 186 urban), 95% had access to touch-tone telephone service, while 46% had Internet access (56% of urban patients, 38% of rural patients). Higher rates of Internet access were related to younger patient age, current employment, and higher education and income. The primary barrier to Internet access was lack of interest. Use of the Internet for health related activities was less than 50%. The preferred means of symptom reporting in patients with internet access were the touch-tone telephone (70%), compared to reporting by the Internet (28%). Conclusion: Access to communication technologies appears adequate for home-based symptom reporting. The use of touch-tone telephone and Internet reporting, based upon patient preference, has the potential of enhancing symptom detection among cancer patients that is not dependent solely upon clinic visits and clinician inquiry.

Original languageEnglish
Article number18
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 17 2005

Fingerprint

Internet
Communication
Technology
Touch
Telephone
Neoplasms
Patient Advocacy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Patient Preference
Ambulatory Care
Education
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Genetics

Cite this

Abdullah, M., Theobald, D. E., Butler, D., Kroenke, K., Perkins, A., Edgerton, S., & Dugan, W. M. (2005). Access to communication technologies in a sample of cancer patients: An urban and rural survey. BMC Cancer, 5, [18]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-5-18

Access to communication technologies in a sample of cancer patients : An urban and rural survey. / Abdullah, Ma'n; Theobald, Dale E.; Butler, Donna; Kroenke, Kurt; Perkins, Anthony; Edgerton, Sara; Dugan, William M.

In: BMC Cancer, Vol. 5, 18, 17.02.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdullah, Ma'n ; Theobald, Dale E. ; Butler, Donna ; Kroenke, Kurt ; Perkins, Anthony ; Edgerton, Sara ; Dugan, William M. / Access to communication technologies in a sample of cancer patients : An urban and rural survey. In: BMC Cancer. 2005 ; Vol. 5.
@article{e8a3ac284f004498a18a8bb1ba718c3f,
title = "Access to communication technologies in a sample of cancer patients: An urban and rural survey",
abstract = "Background: There is a growing awareness among providers of the symptom burden experienced by cancer patients. Systematic symptom screening is difficult. Our plan was to evaluate a technology-based symptom screening process using touch-tone telephone and Internet in our rural outreach cancer program in Indiana. Would rural patients have adequate access to technologies for home-based symptom reporting? Objectives: 1) To determine access to touch-tone telephone service and Internet for patients in urban and rural clinics; 2) to determine barriers to access; 3) to determine willingness to use technology for home-based symptom reporting. Methods: Patients from representative clinics (seven rural and three urban) in our network were surveyed. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 18, able to read, and diagnosis of malignancy. Results: The response rate was 97{\%}. Of 416 patients completing the survey (230 rural, 186 urban), 95{\%} had access to touch-tone telephone service, while 46{\%} had Internet access (56{\%} of urban patients, 38{\%} of rural patients). Higher rates of Internet access were related to younger patient age, current employment, and higher education and income. The primary barrier to Internet access was lack of interest. Use of the Internet for health related activities was less than 50{\%}. The preferred means of symptom reporting in patients with internet access were the touch-tone telephone (70{\%}), compared to reporting by the Internet (28{\%}). Conclusion: Access to communication technologies appears adequate for home-based symptom reporting. The use of touch-tone telephone and Internet reporting, based upon patient preference, has the potential of enhancing symptom detection among cancer patients that is not dependent solely upon clinic visits and clinician inquiry.",
author = "Ma'n Abdullah and Theobald, {Dale E.} and Donna Butler and Kurt Kroenke and Anthony Perkins and Sara Edgerton and Dugan, {William M.}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2407-5-18",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMC Cancer",
issn = "1471-2407",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Access to communication technologies in a sample of cancer patients

T2 - An urban and rural survey

AU - Abdullah, Ma'n

AU - Theobald, Dale E.

AU - Butler, Donna

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

AU - Perkins, Anthony

AU - Edgerton, Sara

AU - Dugan, William M.

PY - 2005/2/17

Y1 - 2005/2/17

N2 - Background: There is a growing awareness among providers of the symptom burden experienced by cancer patients. Systematic symptom screening is difficult. Our plan was to evaluate a technology-based symptom screening process using touch-tone telephone and Internet in our rural outreach cancer program in Indiana. Would rural patients have adequate access to technologies for home-based symptom reporting? Objectives: 1) To determine access to touch-tone telephone service and Internet for patients in urban and rural clinics; 2) to determine barriers to access; 3) to determine willingness to use technology for home-based symptom reporting. Methods: Patients from representative clinics (seven rural and three urban) in our network were surveyed. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 18, able to read, and diagnosis of malignancy. Results: The response rate was 97%. Of 416 patients completing the survey (230 rural, 186 urban), 95% had access to touch-tone telephone service, while 46% had Internet access (56% of urban patients, 38% of rural patients). Higher rates of Internet access were related to younger patient age, current employment, and higher education and income. The primary barrier to Internet access was lack of interest. Use of the Internet for health related activities was less than 50%. The preferred means of symptom reporting in patients with internet access were the touch-tone telephone (70%), compared to reporting by the Internet (28%). Conclusion: Access to communication technologies appears adequate for home-based symptom reporting. The use of touch-tone telephone and Internet reporting, based upon patient preference, has the potential of enhancing symptom detection among cancer patients that is not dependent solely upon clinic visits and clinician inquiry.

AB - Background: There is a growing awareness among providers of the symptom burden experienced by cancer patients. Systematic symptom screening is difficult. Our plan was to evaluate a technology-based symptom screening process using touch-tone telephone and Internet in our rural outreach cancer program in Indiana. Would rural patients have adequate access to technologies for home-based symptom reporting? Objectives: 1) To determine access to touch-tone telephone service and Internet for patients in urban and rural clinics; 2) to determine barriers to access; 3) to determine willingness to use technology for home-based symptom reporting. Methods: Patients from representative clinics (seven rural and three urban) in our network were surveyed. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 18, able to read, and diagnosis of malignancy. Results: The response rate was 97%. Of 416 patients completing the survey (230 rural, 186 urban), 95% had access to touch-tone telephone service, while 46% had Internet access (56% of urban patients, 38% of rural patients). Higher rates of Internet access were related to younger patient age, current employment, and higher education and income. The primary barrier to Internet access was lack of interest. Use of the Internet for health related activities was less than 50%. The preferred means of symptom reporting in patients with internet access were the touch-tone telephone (70%), compared to reporting by the Internet (28%). Conclusion: Access to communication technologies appears adequate for home-based symptom reporting. The use of touch-tone telephone and Internet reporting, based upon patient preference, has the potential of enhancing symptom detection among cancer patients that is not dependent solely upon clinic visits and clinician inquiry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26844525843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26844525843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2407-5-18

DO - 10.1186/1471-2407-5-18

M3 - Article

C2 - 15717933

AN - SCOPUS:26844525843

VL - 5

JO - BMC Cancer

JF - BMC Cancer

SN - 1471-2407

M1 - 18

ER -