Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method

Christopher E. Byrum, James R. MacFall, H. Cecil Charles, Venkata R. Chitilla, Orest Boyko, Lucy Upchurch, Jean S. Smith, Pradeep Rajagopalan, Theodore Passe, Dennis Kim, Stavra Xanthakos, K. Ranga, R. Krishnan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging now allows the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the human brain in vivo. As MR imaging resolution has improved, precise measurement of small brain structures has become possible. Methods of measuring brain regions from MR images include both manual and semiautomated methods. Despite the development of numerous volumetric methods, there have been only limited attempts so far to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of these methods. In this study we used phantoms to assess the accuracy of the segmentation process. Our results with simple and complex phantoms indicate an error of 3-5% using either manual or semiautomated techniques. We subsequently used manual and semiautomated volumetric methodologies to study human brain structures in vivo in five normal subjects. Supervised segmentation is a semiautomated method that accomplishes the division of MR images into several tissue types based on differences in signal intensity. This technique requires the operator to manually identify points on the MR images that characterize each tissue type, a process known as seeding. However, the use of supervised segmentation to assess the volumes of gray and white matter is subject to pitfalls. Inhomogeneities of the radiofrequency or magnetic fields can result in misclassification of tissue points during the tissue seeding process, limiting the accuracy and reliability of the segmentation process. We used a structured seeding protocol that allowed for field inhomogeneity that produced reduced variation in measured tissue volumes. We used repeated segmentations to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability, and were able to measure small and large regions of interest with a small degree of variation. In addition, we demonstrated that measurements are reproducible with repeat MR acquisitions, with minimal interscan variability. Segmentation methods can accurately and reliably measure subtle morphometric changes, and will prove a boon to the study of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-234
Number of pages20
JournalPsychiatry Research - Neuroimaging
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 7 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Brain
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Fields

Keywords

  • seeding
  • semiautomated
  • signal intensity
  • stereologic point counting
  • volumetric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Byrum, C. E., MacFall, J. R., Charles, H. C., Chitilla, V. R., Boyko, O., Upchurch, L., ... Krishnan, R. (1996). Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method. Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging, 67(3), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4927(96)02790-4

Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method. / Byrum, Christopher E.; MacFall, James R.; Charles, H. Cecil; Chitilla, Venkata R.; Boyko, Orest; Upchurch, Lucy; Smith, Jean S.; Rajagopalan, Pradeep; Passe, Theodore; Kim, Dennis; Xanthakos, Stavra; Ranga, K.; Krishnan, R.

In: Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging, Vol. 67, No. 3, 07.10.1996, p. 215-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Byrum, CE, MacFall, JR, Charles, HC, Chitilla, VR, Boyko, O, Upchurch, L, Smith, JS, Rajagopalan, P, Passe, T, Kim, D, Xanthakos, S, Ranga, K & Krishnan, R 1996, 'Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method', Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4927(96)02790-4
Byrum, Christopher E. ; MacFall, James R. ; Charles, H. Cecil ; Chitilla, Venkata R. ; Boyko, Orest ; Upchurch, Lucy ; Smith, Jean S. ; Rajagopalan, Pradeep ; Passe, Theodore ; Kim, Dennis ; Xanthakos, Stavra ; Ranga, K. ; Krishnan, R. / Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method. In: Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging. 1996 ; Vol. 67, No. 3. pp. 215-234.
@article{482cf2bea7524d3598052acf6c68e67e,
title = "Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method",
abstract = "Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging now allows the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the human brain in vivo. As MR imaging resolution has improved, precise measurement of small brain structures has become possible. Methods of measuring brain regions from MR images include both manual and semiautomated methods. Despite the development of numerous volumetric methods, there have been only limited attempts so far to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of these methods. In this study we used phantoms to assess the accuracy of the segmentation process. Our results with simple and complex phantoms indicate an error of 3-5{\%} using either manual or semiautomated techniques. We subsequently used manual and semiautomated volumetric methodologies to study human brain structures in vivo in five normal subjects. Supervised segmentation is a semiautomated method that accomplishes the division of MR images into several tissue types based on differences in signal intensity. This technique requires the operator to manually identify points on the MR images that characterize each tissue type, a process known as seeding. However, the use of supervised segmentation to assess the volumes of gray and white matter is subject to pitfalls. Inhomogeneities of the radiofrequency or magnetic fields can result in misclassification of tissue points during the tissue seeding process, limiting the accuracy and reliability of the segmentation process. We used a structured seeding protocol that allowed for field inhomogeneity that produced reduced variation in measured tissue volumes. We used repeated segmentations to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability, and were able to measure small and large regions of interest with a small degree of variation. In addition, we demonstrated that measurements are reproducible with repeat MR acquisitions, with minimal interscan variability. Segmentation methods can accurately and reliably measure subtle morphometric changes, and will prove a boon to the study of neuropsychiatric disorders.",
keywords = "seeding, semiautomated, signal intensity, stereologic point counting, volumetric",
author = "Byrum, {Christopher E.} and MacFall, {James R.} and Charles, {H. Cecil} and Chitilla, {Venkata R.} and Orest Boyko and Lucy Upchurch and Smith, {Jean S.} and Pradeep Rajagopalan and Theodore Passe and Dennis Kim and Stavra Xanthakos and K. Ranga and R. Krishnan",
year = "1996",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/0925-4927(96)02790-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "215--234",
journal = "Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging",
issn = "0925-4927",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method

AU - Byrum, Christopher E.

AU - MacFall, James R.

AU - Charles, H. Cecil

AU - Chitilla, Venkata R.

AU - Boyko, Orest

AU - Upchurch, Lucy

AU - Smith, Jean S.

AU - Rajagopalan, Pradeep

AU - Passe, Theodore

AU - Kim, Dennis

AU - Xanthakos, Stavra

AU - Ranga, K.

AU - Krishnan, R.

PY - 1996/10/7

Y1 - 1996/10/7

N2 - Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging now allows the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the human brain in vivo. As MR imaging resolution has improved, precise measurement of small brain structures has become possible. Methods of measuring brain regions from MR images include both manual and semiautomated methods. Despite the development of numerous volumetric methods, there have been only limited attempts so far to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of these methods. In this study we used phantoms to assess the accuracy of the segmentation process. Our results with simple and complex phantoms indicate an error of 3-5% using either manual or semiautomated techniques. We subsequently used manual and semiautomated volumetric methodologies to study human brain structures in vivo in five normal subjects. Supervised segmentation is a semiautomated method that accomplishes the division of MR images into several tissue types based on differences in signal intensity. This technique requires the operator to manually identify points on the MR images that characterize each tissue type, a process known as seeding. However, the use of supervised segmentation to assess the volumes of gray and white matter is subject to pitfalls. Inhomogeneities of the radiofrequency or magnetic fields can result in misclassification of tissue points during the tissue seeding process, limiting the accuracy and reliability of the segmentation process. We used a structured seeding protocol that allowed for field inhomogeneity that produced reduced variation in measured tissue volumes. We used repeated segmentations to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability, and were able to measure small and large regions of interest with a small degree of variation. In addition, we demonstrated that measurements are reproducible with repeat MR acquisitions, with minimal interscan variability. Segmentation methods can accurately and reliably measure subtle morphometric changes, and will prove a boon to the study of neuropsychiatric disorders.

AB - Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging now allows the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the human brain in vivo. As MR imaging resolution has improved, precise measurement of small brain structures has become possible. Methods of measuring brain regions from MR images include both manual and semiautomated methods. Despite the development of numerous volumetric methods, there have been only limited attempts so far to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of these methods. In this study we used phantoms to assess the accuracy of the segmentation process. Our results with simple and complex phantoms indicate an error of 3-5% using either manual or semiautomated techniques. We subsequently used manual and semiautomated volumetric methodologies to study human brain structures in vivo in five normal subjects. Supervised segmentation is a semiautomated method that accomplishes the division of MR images into several tissue types based on differences in signal intensity. This technique requires the operator to manually identify points on the MR images that characterize each tissue type, a process known as seeding. However, the use of supervised segmentation to assess the volumes of gray and white matter is subject to pitfalls. Inhomogeneities of the radiofrequency or magnetic fields can result in misclassification of tissue points during the tissue seeding process, limiting the accuracy and reliability of the segmentation process. We used a structured seeding protocol that allowed for field inhomogeneity that produced reduced variation in measured tissue volumes. We used repeated segmentations to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability, and were able to measure small and large regions of interest with a small degree of variation. In addition, we demonstrated that measurements are reproducible with repeat MR acquisitions, with minimal interscan variability. Segmentation methods can accurately and reliably measure subtle morphometric changes, and will prove a boon to the study of neuropsychiatric disorders.

KW - seeding

KW - semiautomated

KW - signal intensity

KW - stereologic point counting

KW - volumetric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030574075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030574075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0925-4927(96)02790-4

DO - 10.1016/0925-4927(96)02790-4

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 215

EP - 234

JO - Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging

JF - Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging

SN - 0925-4927

IS - 3

ER -