Accuracy of a novel ultrasound technique for confirmation of endotracheal intubation by expert and novice emergency physicians

Michael Gottlieb, John M. Bailitz, Errick Christian, Frances Russell, Robert R. Ehrman, Basem Khishfe, Alexander Kogan, Christopher Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Recent research has investigated the use of ultrasound (US) for confirming endotracheal tube (ETT) placement with varying techniques, accuracies, and challenges. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel, simplified, four-step (4S) technique.

Methods: We conducted a blinded, randomized trial of the 4S technique utilizing an adult human cadaver model. ETT placement was randomized to tracheal or esophageal location. Three US experts and 45 emergency medicine residents (EMR) performed a total of 150 scans. The primary outcome was the overall sensitivity and specificity of both experts and EMRs to detect location of ETT placement. Secondary outcomes included a priori subgroup comparison of experts and EMRs for thin and obese cadavers, time to detection, and level of operator confidence.

Results: Experts had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 72% to 100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI = 77% to 100%) on thin, and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI = 66% to 100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI = 75% to 100%) on obese cadavers. EMRs had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI = 69% to 98%) and of specificity 96% (95% CI = 76% to 100%) on thin, and a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 82% to 100%) specificity of 48% (95% CI = 27% to 69%) on obese cadavers. The overall mean time to detection was 17 seconds (95% CI = 13 seconds to 20 seconds, range: 2 to 63 seconds) for US experts and 29 seconds (95% CI = 25 seconds to 33 seconds; range: 6 to 120 seconds) for EMRs. There was a statistically significant decrease in the specificity of this technique on obese cadavers when comparing the EMRs and experts, as well as an increased overall time to detection among the EMRs.

Conclusion: The simplified 4S technique was accurate and rapid for US experts. Among novices, the 4S technique was accurate in thin but appears less accurate in obese cadavers. Further studies will determine optimal teaching time and accuracy in emergency department patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)834-839
Number of pages6
JournalWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intratracheal Intubation
Cadaver
Emergencies
Physicians
Emergency Medicine
Hospital Emergency Service
Teaching
Sensitivity and Specificity
Research

Keywords

  • Airway
  • Endotracheal
  • Intubation
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Accuracy of a novel ultrasound technique for confirmation of endotracheal intubation by expert and novice emergency physicians. / Gottlieb, Michael; Bailitz, John M.; Christian, Errick; Russell, Frances; Ehrman, Robert R.; Khishfe, Basem; Kogan, Alexander; Ross, Christopher.

In: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2014, p. 834-839.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gottlieb, Michael ; Bailitz, John M. ; Christian, Errick ; Russell, Frances ; Ehrman, Robert R. ; Khishfe, Basem ; Kogan, Alexander ; Ross, Christopher. / Accuracy of a novel ultrasound technique for confirmation of endotracheal intubation by expert and novice emergency physicians. In: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. 7. pp. 834-839.
@article{dbcb25bfad07416b8aaecec4a0e959c0,
title = "Accuracy of a novel ultrasound technique for confirmation of endotracheal intubation by expert and novice emergency physicians",
abstract = "Introduction: Recent research has investigated the use of ultrasound (US) for confirming endotracheal tube (ETT) placement with varying techniques, accuracies, and challenges. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel, simplified, four-step (4S) technique.Methods: We conducted a blinded, randomized trial of the 4S technique utilizing an adult human cadaver model. ETT placement was randomized to tracheal or esophageal location. Three US experts and 45 emergency medicine residents (EMR) performed a total of 150 scans. The primary outcome was the overall sensitivity and specificity of both experts and EMRs to detect location of ETT placement. Secondary outcomes included a priori subgroup comparison of experts and EMRs for thin and obese cadavers, time to detection, and level of operator confidence.Results: Experts had a sensitivity of 100{\%} (95{\%} CI = 72{\%} to 100{\%}) and specificity of 100{\%} (95{\%} CI = 77{\%} to 100{\%}) on thin, and a sensitivity of 93{\%} (95{\%} CI = 66{\%} to 100{\%}) and specificity of 100{\%} (95{\%} CI = 75{\%} to 100{\%}) on obese cadavers. EMRs had a sensitivity of 91{\%} (95{\%} CI = 69{\%} to 98{\%}) and of specificity 96{\%} (95{\%} CI = 76{\%} to 100{\%}) on thin, and a sensitivity of 100{\%} (95{\%} CI = 82{\%} to 100{\%}) specificity of 48{\%} (95{\%} CI = 27{\%} to 69{\%}) on obese cadavers. The overall mean time to detection was 17 seconds (95{\%} CI = 13 seconds to 20 seconds, range: 2 to 63 seconds) for US experts and 29 seconds (95{\%} CI = 25 seconds to 33 seconds; range: 6 to 120 seconds) for EMRs. There was a statistically significant decrease in the specificity of this technique on obese cadavers when comparing the EMRs and experts, as well as an increased overall time to detection among the EMRs.Conclusion: The simplified 4S technique was accurate and rapid for US experts. Among novices, the 4S technique was accurate in thin but appears less accurate in obese cadavers. Further studies will determine optimal teaching time and accuracy in emergency department patients.",
keywords = "Airway, Endotracheal, Intubation, Ultrasound",
author = "Michael Gottlieb and Bailitz, {John M.} and Errick Christian and Frances Russell and Ehrman, {Robert R.} and Basem Khishfe and Alexander Kogan and Christopher Ross",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5811/westjem.22550.9.22550",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "834--839",
journal = "Western Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1936-900X",
publisher = "University of California",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of a novel ultrasound technique for confirmation of endotracheal intubation by expert and novice emergency physicians

AU - Gottlieb, Michael

AU - Bailitz, John M.

AU - Christian, Errick

AU - Russell, Frances

AU - Ehrman, Robert R.

AU - Khishfe, Basem

AU - Kogan, Alexander

AU - Ross, Christopher

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Introduction: Recent research has investigated the use of ultrasound (US) for confirming endotracheal tube (ETT) placement with varying techniques, accuracies, and challenges. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel, simplified, four-step (4S) technique.Methods: We conducted a blinded, randomized trial of the 4S technique utilizing an adult human cadaver model. ETT placement was randomized to tracheal or esophageal location. Three US experts and 45 emergency medicine residents (EMR) performed a total of 150 scans. The primary outcome was the overall sensitivity and specificity of both experts and EMRs to detect location of ETT placement. Secondary outcomes included a priori subgroup comparison of experts and EMRs for thin and obese cadavers, time to detection, and level of operator confidence.Results: Experts had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 72% to 100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI = 77% to 100%) on thin, and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI = 66% to 100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI = 75% to 100%) on obese cadavers. EMRs had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI = 69% to 98%) and of specificity 96% (95% CI = 76% to 100%) on thin, and a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 82% to 100%) specificity of 48% (95% CI = 27% to 69%) on obese cadavers. The overall mean time to detection was 17 seconds (95% CI = 13 seconds to 20 seconds, range: 2 to 63 seconds) for US experts and 29 seconds (95% CI = 25 seconds to 33 seconds; range: 6 to 120 seconds) for EMRs. There was a statistically significant decrease in the specificity of this technique on obese cadavers when comparing the EMRs and experts, as well as an increased overall time to detection among the EMRs.Conclusion: The simplified 4S technique was accurate and rapid for US experts. Among novices, the 4S technique was accurate in thin but appears less accurate in obese cadavers. Further studies will determine optimal teaching time and accuracy in emergency department patients.

AB - Introduction: Recent research has investigated the use of ultrasound (US) for confirming endotracheal tube (ETT) placement with varying techniques, accuracies, and challenges. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel, simplified, four-step (4S) technique.Methods: We conducted a blinded, randomized trial of the 4S technique utilizing an adult human cadaver model. ETT placement was randomized to tracheal or esophageal location. Three US experts and 45 emergency medicine residents (EMR) performed a total of 150 scans. The primary outcome was the overall sensitivity and specificity of both experts and EMRs to detect location of ETT placement. Secondary outcomes included a priori subgroup comparison of experts and EMRs for thin and obese cadavers, time to detection, and level of operator confidence.Results: Experts had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 72% to 100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI = 77% to 100%) on thin, and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI = 66% to 100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI = 75% to 100%) on obese cadavers. EMRs had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI = 69% to 98%) and of specificity 96% (95% CI = 76% to 100%) on thin, and a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 82% to 100%) specificity of 48% (95% CI = 27% to 69%) on obese cadavers. The overall mean time to detection was 17 seconds (95% CI = 13 seconds to 20 seconds, range: 2 to 63 seconds) for US experts and 29 seconds (95% CI = 25 seconds to 33 seconds; range: 6 to 120 seconds) for EMRs. There was a statistically significant decrease in the specificity of this technique on obese cadavers when comparing the EMRs and experts, as well as an increased overall time to detection among the EMRs.Conclusion: The simplified 4S technique was accurate and rapid for US experts. Among novices, the 4S technique was accurate in thin but appears less accurate in obese cadavers. Further studies will determine optimal teaching time and accuracy in emergency department patients.

KW - Airway

KW - Endotracheal

KW - Intubation

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913537408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84913537408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5811/westjem.22550.9.22550

DO - 10.5811/westjem.22550.9.22550

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 834

EP - 839

JO - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 1936-900X

IS - 7

ER -