Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract surgery

Daniel Neely, David Plager, Sara M. Borger, Richard L. Golub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in children undergoing cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 101 consecutive cases of pediatric cataract extraction with posterior chamber IOL. Median age at the time of surgery was 4.8 years, and 23 of the children were younger than 2 years of age. Initial IOL calculations were made using either the SRK II or SRK T formulas. Preoperative predictive data were compared with the refractive result obtained at the 2-month postoperative visit. Prediction error was calculated for each patient, and lens calculation errors were back-calculated for each of 4 commonly used IOL calculation formulas, including the SRK II, SRK T, Holladay I, and Hoffer Q. Results: The mean prediction error for all patients was 0.30 D. Despite this level of overall accuracy, significant variability did occur with outcomes ranging from -4.06 D to + 3.86 D of the desired spherical equivalent. Mean absolute prediction error was 1.16 D with no significant difference between the SRK II and SRK T formulas. Lens calculation errors predicted by each of the 4 formulas studied demonstrated a high degree of variability with the SRK II being the least variable and the Hoffer Q being the most variable, particularly among the youngest group of children with the axial lengths less than 19 mm. Conclusions: The accuracy of commonly used IOL calculation formulas is generally reasonable but highly variable within the pediatric population, Newer theoretic IOL calculation formulas did not outperform older regression models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-165
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Intraocular Lenses
Cataract
Cataract Extraction
Lenses
Pediatrics
Intraocular Lens Implantation
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract surgery. / Neely, Daniel; Plager, David; Borger, Sara M.; Golub, Richard L.

In: Journal of AAPOS, Vol. 9, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 160-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dc31f6b477e74400ba9b34bf58a2cd9d,
title = "Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract surgery",
abstract = "Purpose: We sought to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in children undergoing cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 101 consecutive cases of pediatric cataract extraction with posterior chamber IOL. Median age at the time of surgery was 4.8 years, and 23 of the children were younger than 2 years of age. Initial IOL calculations were made using either the SRK II or SRK T formulas. Preoperative predictive data were compared with the refractive result obtained at the 2-month postoperative visit. Prediction error was calculated for each patient, and lens calculation errors were back-calculated for each of 4 commonly used IOL calculation formulas, including the SRK II, SRK T, Holladay I, and Hoffer Q. Results: The mean prediction error for all patients was 0.30 D. Despite this level of overall accuracy, significant variability did occur with outcomes ranging from -4.06 D to + 3.86 D of the desired spherical equivalent. Mean absolute prediction error was 1.16 D with no significant difference between the SRK II and SRK T formulas. Lens calculation errors predicted by each of the 4 formulas studied demonstrated a high degree of variability with the SRK II being the least variable and the Hoffer Q being the most variable, particularly among the youngest group of children with the axial lengths less than 19 mm. Conclusions: The accuracy of commonly used IOL calculation formulas is generally reasonable but highly variable within the pediatric population, Newer theoretic IOL calculation formulas did not outperform older regression models.",
author = "Daniel Neely and David Plager and Borger, {Sara M.} and Golub, {Richard L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.010",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "160--165",
journal = "Journal of AAPOS",
issn = "1091-8531",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in infants and children undergoing cataract surgery

AU - Neely, Daniel

AU - Plager, David

AU - Borger, Sara M.

AU - Golub, Richard L.

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Purpose: We sought to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in children undergoing cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 101 consecutive cases of pediatric cataract extraction with posterior chamber IOL. Median age at the time of surgery was 4.8 years, and 23 of the children were younger than 2 years of age. Initial IOL calculations were made using either the SRK II or SRK T formulas. Preoperative predictive data were compared with the refractive result obtained at the 2-month postoperative visit. Prediction error was calculated for each patient, and lens calculation errors were back-calculated for each of 4 commonly used IOL calculation formulas, including the SRK II, SRK T, Holladay I, and Hoffer Q. Results: The mean prediction error for all patients was 0.30 D. Despite this level of overall accuracy, significant variability did occur with outcomes ranging from -4.06 D to + 3.86 D of the desired spherical equivalent. Mean absolute prediction error was 1.16 D with no significant difference between the SRK II and SRK T formulas. Lens calculation errors predicted by each of the 4 formulas studied demonstrated a high degree of variability with the SRK II being the least variable and the Hoffer Q being the most variable, particularly among the youngest group of children with the axial lengths less than 19 mm. Conclusions: The accuracy of commonly used IOL calculation formulas is generally reasonable but highly variable within the pediatric population, Newer theoretic IOL calculation formulas did not outperform older regression models.

AB - Purpose: We sought to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens calculations in children undergoing cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 101 consecutive cases of pediatric cataract extraction with posterior chamber IOL. Median age at the time of surgery was 4.8 years, and 23 of the children were younger than 2 years of age. Initial IOL calculations were made using either the SRK II or SRK T formulas. Preoperative predictive data were compared with the refractive result obtained at the 2-month postoperative visit. Prediction error was calculated for each patient, and lens calculation errors were back-calculated for each of 4 commonly used IOL calculation formulas, including the SRK II, SRK T, Holladay I, and Hoffer Q. Results: The mean prediction error for all patients was 0.30 D. Despite this level of overall accuracy, significant variability did occur with outcomes ranging from -4.06 D to + 3.86 D of the desired spherical equivalent. Mean absolute prediction error was 1.16 D with no significant difference between the SRK II and SRK T formulas. Lens calculation errors predicted by each of the 4 formulas studied demonstrated a high degree of variability with the SRK II being the least variable and the Hoffer Q being the most variable, particularly among the youngest group of children with the axial lengths less than 19 mm. Conclusions: The accuracy of commonly used IOL calculation formulas is generally reasonable but highly variable within the pediatric population, Newer theoretic IOL calculation formulas did not outperform older regression models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444405294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444405294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 15838444

AN - SCOPUS:17444405294

VL - 9

SP - 160

EP - 165

JO - Journal of AAPOS

JF - Journal of AAPOS

SN - 1091-8531

IS - 2

ER -