Accuracy of uncorrected versus corrected QT interval for prediction of torsade de pointes associated with intravenous haloperidol

James E. Tisdale, Richard Kovacs, Deming Mi, George P. McCabe, Beth L. Cariera, Nagaraja Sharma, Howard Rosman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective. To determine if the uncorrected QT interval (QT u) more accurately predicts drug-induced torsade de pointes than QT intervals corrected using the Bazett's (QTB), Fridericia (QT Frid), or Framingham (QTFram) methods. Design. Retrospective analysis of a previously reported case-control study of risk factors for haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes. Setting. Large tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients. Forty-six critically ill patients who received intravenous haloperidol for sedation; seven developed torsade de pointes. Measurements and Main Results. The QT intervals were measured manually by one investigator from electrocardiograms performed before and during haloperidol therapy. Logistic regression analysis for prediction of torsade de pointes was performed, incorporating QTu, QTB, QTFrid, QTFram, and RR intervals measured during treatment. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed. Primary outcome measures were proportion of explained variation (maximum-rescaled R 2); area under the ROC curves for QTu, QTB, QTFrid, QTFram, and RR interval; and sensitivity and specificity for prediction of haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes. The QTu was associated with the highest R2 compared with QTFram, QTFrid, QTB, and RR interval (0.77, 0.73, 0.68, 0.53, and 0.30, respectively). No significant differences in areas under the ROC curves were found between any of the QT-interval methods. Areas under the ROC curves for QTu and QTFram trended toward being greater than that associated with the RR interval. All QT-interval methods were highly sensitive (100% for each), whereas the RR interval was less sensitive (86%); QTu and QTFram were most specific (82%) compared with the QTFrid (72%), QTB (64%), and RR interval (36%). Conclusion. Compared with QTB and QTFrid, the QTu and QTFram best predicted haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes in critically ill patients; the QTFram offered no advantage over the QTu.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-182
Number of pages8
JournalPharmacotherapy
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Torsades de Pointes
Haloperidol
ROC Curve
Critical Illness
Tertiary Healthcare
Teaching Hospitals
Case-Control Studies
Electrocardiography
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Sensitivity and Specificity
Therapeutics
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Adverse drug reactions
  • Arrhythmias
  • Critical care
  • Drug safety
  • Electrocardiogram
  • Haloperidol
  • Long QT syndrome
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Torsade de pointes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Accuracy of uncorrected versus corrected QT interval for prediction of torsade de pointes associated with intravenous haloperidol. / Tisdale, James E.; Kovacs, Richard; Mi, Deming; McCabe, George P.; Cariera, Beth L.; Sharma, Nagaraja; Rosman, Howard.

In: Pharmacotherapy, Vol. 27, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 175-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tisdale, James E. ; Kovacs, Richard ; Mi, Deming ; McCabe, George P. ; Cariera, Beth L. ; Sharma, Nagaraja ; Rosman, Howard. / Accuracy of uncorrected versus corrected QT interval for prediction of torsade de pointes associated with intravenous haloperidol. In: Pharmacotherapy. 2007 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 175-182.
@article{87836c127fac49fd8c4eebe033e712c6,
title = "Accuracy of uncorrected versus corrected QT interval for prediction of torsade de pointes associated with intravenous haloperidol",
abstract = "Study Objective. To determine if the uncorrected QT interval (QT u) more accurately predicts drug-induced torsade de pointes than QT intervals corrected using the Bazett's (QTB), Fridericia (QT Frid), or Framingham (QTFram) methods. Design. Retrospective analysis of a previously reported case-control study of risk factors for haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes. Setting. Large tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients. Forty-six critically ill patients who received intravenous haloperidol for sedation; seven developed torsade de pointes. Measurements and Main Results. The QT intervals were measured manually by one investigator from electrocardiograms performed before and during haloperidol therapy. Logistic regression analysis for prediction of torsade de pointes was performed, incorporating QTu, QTB, QTFrid, QTFram, and RR intervals measured during treatment. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed. Primary outcome measures were proportion of explained variation (maximum-rescaled R 2); area under the ROC curves for QTu, QTB, QTFrid, QTFram, and RR interval; and sensitivity and specificity for prediction of haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes. The QTu was associated with the highest R2 compared with QTFram, QTFrid, QTB, and RR interval (0.77, 0.73, 0.68, 0.53, and 0.30, respectively). No significant differences in areas under the ROC curves were found between any of the QT-interval methods. Areas under the ROC curves for QTu and QTFram trended toward being greater than that associated with the RR interval. All QT-interval methods were highly sensitive (100{\%} for each), whereas the RR interval was less sensitive (86{\%}); QTu and QTFram were most specific (82{\%}) compared with the QTFrid (72{\%}), QTB (64{\%}), and RR interval (36{\%}). Conclusion. Compared with QTB and QTFrid, the QTu and QTFram best predicted haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes in critically ill patients; the QTFram offered no advantage over the QTu.",
keywords = "Adverse drug reactions, Arrhythmias, Critical care, Drug safety, Electrocardiogram, Haloperidol, Long QT syndrome, Sensitivity, Specificity, Torsade de pointes",
author = "Tisdale, {James E.} and Richard Kovacs and Deming Mi and McCabe, {George P.} and Cariera, {Beth L.} and Nagaraja Sharma and Howard Rosman",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1592/phco.27.2.175",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "175--182",
journal = "Pharmacotherapy",
issn = "0277-0008",
publisher = "Pharmacotherapy Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of uncorrected versus corrected QT interval for prediction of torsade de pointes associated with intravenous haloperidol

AU - Tisdale, James E.

AU - Kovacs, Richard

AU - Mi, Deming

AU - McCabe, George P.

AU - Cariera, Beth L.

AU - Sharma, Nagaraja

AU - Rosman, Howard

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Study Objective. To determine if the uncorrected QT interval (QT u) more accurately predicts drug-induced torsade de pointes than QT intervals corrected using the Bazett's (QTB), Fridericia (QT Frid), or Framingham (QTFram) methods. Design. Retrospective analysis of a previously reported case-control study of risk factors for haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes. Setting. Large tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients. Forty-six critically ill patients who received intravenous haloperidol for sedation; seven developed torsade de pointes. Measurements and Main Results. The QT intervals were measured manually by one investigator from electrocardiograms performed before and during haloperidol therapy. Logistic regression analysis for prediction of torsade de pointes was performed, incorporating QTu, QTB, QTFrid, QTFram, and RR intervals measured during treatment. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed. Primary outcome measures were proportion of explained variation (maximum-rescaled R 2); area under the ROC curves for QTu, QTB, QTFrid, QTFram, and RR interval; and sensitivity and specificity for prediction of haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes. The QTu was associated with the highest R2 compared with QTFram, QTFrid, QTB, and RR interval (0.77, 0.73, 0.68, 0.53, and 0.30, respectively). No significant differences in areas under the ROC curves were found between any of the QT-interval methods. Areas under the ROC curves for QTu and QTFram trended toward being greater than that associated with the RR interval. All QT-interval methods were highly sensitive (100% for each), whereas the RR interval was less sensitive (86%); QTu and QTFram were most specific (82%) compared with the QTFrid (72%), QTB (64%), and RR interval (36%). Conclusion. Compared with QTB and QTFrid, the QTu and QTFram best predicted haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes in critically ill patients; the QTFram offered no advantage over the QTu.

AB - Study Objective. To determine if the uncorrected QT interval (QT u) more accurately predicts drug-induced torsade de pointes than QT intervals corrected using the Bazett's (QTB), Fridericia (QT Frid), or Framingham (QTFram) methods. Design. Retrospective analysis of a previously reported case-control study of risk factors for haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes. Setting. Large tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients. Forty-six critically ill patients who received intravenous haloperidol for sedation; seven developed torsade de pointes. Measurements and Main Results. The QT intervals were measured manually by one investigator from electrocardiograms performed before and during haloperidol therapy. Logistic regression analysis for prediction of torsade de pointes was performed, incorporating QTu, QTB, QTFrid, QTFram, and RR intervals measured during treatment. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed. Primary outcome measures were proportion of explained variation (maximum-rescaled R 2); area under the ROC curves for QTu, QTB, QTFrid, QTFram, and RR interval; and sensitivity and specificity for prediction of haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes. The QTu was associated with the highest R2 compared with QTFram, QTFrid, QTB, and RR interval (0.77, 0.73, 0.68, 0.53, and 0.30, respectively). No significant differences in areas under the ROC curves were found between any of the QT-interval methods. Areas under the ROC curves for QTu and QTFram trended toward being greater than that associated with the RR interval. All QT-interval methods were highly sensitive (100% for each), whereas the RR interval was less sensitive (86%); QTu and QTFram were most specific (82%) compared with the QTFrid (72%), QTB (64%), and RR interval (36%). Conclusion. Compared with QTB and QTFrid, the QTu and QTFram best predicted haloperidol-induced torsade de pointes in critically ill patients; the QTFram offered no advantage over the QTu.

KW - Adverse drug reactions

KW - Arrhythmias

KW - Critical care

KW - Drug safety

KW - Electrocardiogram

KW - Haloperidol

KW - Long QT syndrome

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

KW - Torsade de pointes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846850510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846850510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1592/phco.27.2.175

DO - 10.1592/phco.27.2.175

M3 - Article

C2 - 17253907

AN - SCOPUS:33846850510

VL - 27

SP - 175

EP - 182

JO - Pharmacotherapy

JF - Pharmacotherapy

SN - 0277-0008

IS - 2

ER -