Acoustic startle and fear-potentiated startle in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats

D. L. McKinzie, T. J. Sajdyk, W. J. McBride, J. M. Murphy, L. Lumeng, T. K. Li, Anantha Shekhar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine whether alcohol-preferring P and -nonpreferring NP rats differ in their acoustic startle response and in fear-potentiated startle. In Experiment 1, male P and NP rats were tested on the startle response to acoustic stimuli ranging from 90-115 dB. Experiments 2 and 3 examined fear-potentiated startle and extinction of the response. In Experiment 2, rats received two light foot shock training sessions separated by 3-4 h. Testing consisted of ten acoustic startle (115 dB) and fear-potentiated startle (light preceding the acoustic startle) presentations administered every 24 h for 9 consecutive days. To test potentiated startle learning under reduced training conditions, a single training session was administered in Experiment 3, and a single within-session extinction test of 50 startle and 50 potentiated startle trials occurred the following day. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that P and NP rats did not differ in startle at any of the acoustic intensities tested. Following fear-potentiated startle conditioning in Experiment 2, however, both acoustic startle and potentiated startle responding were consistently greater in P than NP rats over most of the first 6 test days with P rats having approximately a 100% greater acoustic startle and 50-100% greater potentiated startle response. Moreover, following a single training session in Experiment 3, only P rats showed significant fear-conditioned startle. Additionally, P rats exhibited a 50-100% elevated acoustic startle response over that observed in NP rats. Taken together, the data indicate that, although experimentally naive male P and NP rats show similar acoustic startle responses, P rats become more responsive to both startle-alone and potentiated startle stimuli following fear conditioning. The change in general startle reactivity of the P rat following aversive conditioning, along with facilitated light foot shock learning, suggests that stress exposure may be an important variable in examining associations between anxiety and alcohol drinking behavior. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-696
Number of pages6
JournalPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2000

Fingerprint

Acoustics
Fear
Rats
Startle Reflex
Alcohols
Experiments
Light
Foot
Shock
Learning
Acoustic intensity
Drinking Behavior
Alcohol Drinking
Anxiety

Keywords

  • Acoustic startle
  • Fear conditioning
  • P and NP lines of rats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Acoustic startle and fear-potentiated startle in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats. / McKinzie, D. L.; Sajdyk, T. J.; McBride, W. J.; Murphy, J. M.; Lumeng, L.; Li, T. K.; Shekhar, Anantha.

In: Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Vol. 65, No. 4, 04.2000, p. 691-696.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McKinzie, D. L. ; Sajdyk, T. J. ; McBride, W. J. ; Murphy, J. M. ; Lumeng, L. ; Li, T. K. ; Shekhar, Anantha. / Acoustic startle and fear-potentiated startle in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats. In: Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2000 ; Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 691-696.
@article{f85f6dde2d9e4f068e76b2bad612d245,
title = "Acoustic startle and fear-potentiated startle in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats",
abstract = "The objective of the present study was to determine whether alcohol-preferring P and -nonpreferring NP rats differ in their acoustic startle response and in fear-potentiated startle. In Experiment 1, male P and NP rats were tested on the startle response to acoustic stimuli ranging from 90-115 dB. Experiments 2 and 3 examined fear-potentiated startle and extinction of the response. In Experiment 2, rats received two light foot shock training sessions separated by 3-4 h. Testing consisted of ten acoustic startle (115 dB) and fear-potentiated startle (light preceding the acoustic startle) presentations administered every 24 h for 9 consecutive days. To test potentiated startle learning under reduced training conditions, a single training session was administered in Experiment 3, and a single within-session extinction test of 50 startle and 50 potentiated startle trials occurred the following day. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that P and NP rats did not differ in startle at any of the acoustic intensities tested. Following fear-potentiated startle conditioning in Experiment 2, however, both acoustic startle and potentiated startle responding were consistently greater in P than NP rats over most of the first 6 test days with P rats having approximately a 100{\%} greater acoustic startle and 50-100{\%} greater potentiated startle response. Moreover, following a single training session in Experiment 3, only P rats showed significant fear-conditioned startle. Additionally, P rats exhibited a 50-100{\%} elevated acoustic startle response over that observed in NP rats. Taken together, the data indicate that, although experimentally naive male P and NP rats show similar acoustic startle responses, P rats become more responsive to both startle-alone and potentiated startle stimuli following fear conditioning. The change in general startle reactivity of the P rat following aversive conditioning, along with facilitated light foot shock learning, suggests that stress exposure may be an important variable in examining associations between anxiety and alcohol drinking behavior. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.",
keywords = "Acoustic startle, Fear conditioning, P and NP lines of rats",
author = "McKinzie, {D. L.} and Sajdyk, {T. J.} and McBride, {W. J.} and Murphy, {J. M.} and L. Lumeng and Li, {T. K.} and Anantha Shekhar",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00252-X",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "691--696",
journal = "Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior",
issn = "0091-3057",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acoustic startle and fear-potentiated startle in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats

AU - McKinzie, D. L.

AU - Sajdyk, T. J.

AU - McBride, W. J.

AU - Murphy, J. M.

AU - Lumeng, L.

AU - Li, T. K.

AU - Shekhar, Anantha

PY - 2000/4

Y1 - 2000/4

N2 - The objective of the present study was to determine whether alcohol-preferring P and -nonpreferring NP rats differ in their acoustic startle response and in fear-potentiated startle. In Experiment 1, male P and NP rats were tested on the startle response to acoustic stimuli ranging from 90-115 dB. Experiments 2 and 3 examined fear-potentiated startle and extinction of the response. In Experiment 2, rats received two light foot shock training sessions separated by 3-4 h. Testing consisted of ten acoustic startle (115 dB) and fear-potentiated startle (light preceding the acoustic startle) presentations administered every 24 h for 9 consecutive days. To test potentiated startle learning under reduced training conditions, a single training session was administered in Experiment 3, and a single within-session extinction test of 50 startle and 50 potentiated startle trials occurred the following day. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that P and NP rats did not differ in startle at any of the acoustic intensities tested. Following fear-potentiated startle conditioning in Experiment 2, however, both acoustic startle and potentiated startle responding were consistently greater in P than NP rats over most of the first 6 test days with P rats having approximately a 100% greater acoustic startle and 50-100% greater potentiated startle response. Moreover, following a single training session in Experiment 3, only P rats showed significant fear-conditioned startle. Additionally, P rats exhibited a 50-100% elevated acoustic startle response over that observed in NP rats. Taken together, the data indicate that, although experimentally naive male P and NP rats show similar acoustic startle responses, P rats become more responsive to both startle-alone and potentiated startle stimuli following fear conditioning. The change in general startle reactivity of the P rat following aversive conditioning, along with facilitated light foot shock learning, suggests that stress exposure may be an important variable in examining associations between anxiety and alcohol drinking behavior. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

AB - The objective of the present study was to determine whether alcohol-preferring P and -nonpreferring NP rats differ in their acoustic startle response and in fear-potentiated startle. In Experiment 1, male P and NP rats were tested on the startle response to acoustic stimuli ranging from 90-115 dB. Experiments 2 and 3 examined fear-potentiated startle and extinction of the response. In Experiment 2, rats received two light foot shock training sessions separated by 3-4 h. Testing consisted of ten acoustic startle (115 dB) and fear-potentiated startle (light preceding the acoustic startle) presentations administered every 24 h for 9 consecutive days. To test potentiated startle learning under reduced training conditions, a single training session was administered in Experiment 3, and a single within-session extinction test of 50 startle and 50 potentiated startle trials occurred the following day. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that P and NP rats did not differ in startle at any of the acoustic intensities tested. Following fear-potentiated startle conditioning in Experiment 2, however, both acoustic startle and potentiated startle responding were consistently greater in P than NP rats over most of the first 6 test days with P rats having approximately a 100% greater acoustic startle and 50-100% greater potentiated startle response. Moreover, following a single training session in Experiment 3, only P rats showed significant fear-conditioned startle. Additionally, P rats exhibited a 50-100% elevated acoustic startle response over that observed in NP rats. Taken together, the data indicate that, although experimentally naive male P and NP rats show similar acoustic startle responses, P rats become more responsive to both startle-alone and potentiated startle stimuli following fear conditioning. The change in general startle reactivity of the P rat following aversive conditioning, along with facilitated light foot shock learning, suggests that stress exposure may be an important variable in examining associations between anxiety and alcohol drinking behavior. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

KW - Acoustic startle

KW - Fear conditioning

KW - P and NP lines of rats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034070207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034070207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00252-X

DO - 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00252-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 10764924

AN - SCOPUS:0034070207

VL - 65

SP - 691

EP - 696

JO - Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior

JF - Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior

SN - 0091-3057

IS - 4

ER -