Administrative preparedness strategies

Expediting procurement and contracting cycle times during an emergency

David Hurst, Sharon Sharpe, Valerie Yeager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We assessed whether administrative preparedness processes that were intended to expedite the acquisition of goods and services during a public health emergency affect estimated procurement and contracting cycle times. We obtained data from 2014-2015 applications to the Hospital Preparedness Program and Public Health Emergency Preparedness (HPP-PHEP) cooperative agreements. We compared the estimated procurement and contracting cycle times of 61 HPP-PHEP awardees that did and did not have certain administrative processes in place. Certain processes, such as statutes allowing for procuring and contracting on the open market, had an effect on reducing the estimated cycle times for obtaining goods and services. Other processes, such as cooperative purchasing agreements, also had an effect on estimated procurement time. For example, awardees with statutes that permitted them to obtain goods and services in the open market had an average procurement cycle time of 6 days; those without such statutes had a cycle time of 17 days (P = .04). PHEP awardees should consider adopting these or similar processes in an effort to reduce cycle times.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-297
Number of pages4
JournalPublic Health Reports
Volume132
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Emergencies
Civil Defense
Public Health

Keywords

  • Emergency response
  • Funds allocation
  • Public health preparedness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Administrative preparedness strategies : Expediting procurement and contracting cycle times during an emergency. / Hurst, David; Sharpe, Sharon; Yeager, Valerie.

In: Public Health Reports, Vol. 132, No. 3, 01.05.2017, p. 294-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e44c72e5876415ca989c59b0af2a522,
title = "Administrative preparedness strategies: Expediting procurement and contracting cycle times during an emergency",
abstract = "We assessed whether administrative preparedness processes that were intended to expedite the acquisition of goods and services during a public health emergency affect estimated procurement and contracting cycle times. We obtained data from 2014-2015 applications to the Hospital Preparedness Program and Public Health Emergency Preparedness (HPP-PHEP) cooperative agreements. We compared the estimated procurement and contracting cycle times of 61 HPP-PHEP awardees that did and did not have certain administrative processes in place. Certain processes, such as statutes allowing for procuring and contracting on the open market, had an effect on reducing the estimated cycle times for obtaining goods and services. Other processes, such as cooperative purchasing agreements, also had an effect on estimated procurement time. For example, awardees with statutes that permitted them to obtain goods and services in the open market had an average procurement cycle time of 6 days; those without such statutes had a cycle time of 17 days (P = .04). PHEP awardees should consider adopting these or similar processes in an effort to reduce cycle times.",
keywords = "Emergency response, Funds allocation, Public health preparedness",
author = "David Hurst and Sharon Sharpe and Valerie Yeager",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0033354917698131",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "294--297",
journal = "Public Health Reports",
issn = "0033-3549",
publisher = "Association of Schools of Public Health",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Administrative preparedness strategies

T2 - Expediting procurement and contracting cycle times during an emergency

AU - Hurst, David

AU - Sharpe, Sharon

AU - Yeager, Valerie

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - We assessed whether administrative preparedness processes that were intended to expedite the acquisition of goods and services during a public health emergency affect estimated procurement and contracting cycle times. We obtained data from 2014-2015 applications to the Hospital Preparedness Program and Public Health Emergency Preparedness (HPP-PHEP) cooperative agreements. We compared the estimated procurement and contracting cycle times of 61 HPP-PHEP awardees that did and did not have certain administrative processes in place. Certain processes, such as statutes allowing for procuring and contracting on the open market, had an effect on reducing the estimated cycle times for obtaining goods and services. Other processes, such as cooperative purchasing agreements, also had an effect on estimated procurement time. For example, awardees with statutes that permitted them to obtain goods and services in the open market had an average procurement cycle time of 6 days; those without such statutes had a cycle time of 17 days (P = .04). PHEP awardees should consider adopting these or similar processes in an effort to reduce cycle times.

AB - We assessed whether administrative preparedness processes that were intended to expedite the acquisition of goods and services during a public health emergency affect estimated procurement and contracting cycle times. We obtained data from 2014-2015 applications to the Hospital Preparedness Program and Public Health Emergency Preparedness (HPP-PHEP) cooperative agreements. We compared the estimated procurement and contracting cycle times of 61 HPP-PHEP awardees that did and did not have certain administrative processes in place. Certain processes, such as statutes allowing for procuring and contracting on the open market, had an effect on reducing the estimated cycle times for obtaining goods and services. Other processes, such as cooperative purchasing agreements, also had an effect on estimated procurement time. For example, awardees with statutes that permitted them to obtain goods and services in the open market had an average procurement cycle time of 6 days; those without such statutes had a cycle time of 17 days (P = .04). PHEP awardees should consider adopting these or similar processes in an effort to reduce cycle times.

KW - Emergency response

KW - Funds allocation

KW - Public health preparedness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021859391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021859391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0033354917698131

DO - 10.1177/0033354917698131

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 294

EP - 297

JO - Public Health Reports

JF - Public Health Reports

SN - 0033-3549

IS - 3

ER -