Air Pockets Trapped During Routine Coupling in Dry Head Lithotripsy Can Significantly Decrease the Delivery of Shock Wave Energy

Yuri A. Pishchalnikov, Joshua S. Neucks, R. Jason VonDerHaar, Irina V. Pishchalnikova, James Williams, James A. McAteer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Current lithotriptors use a dry treatment head that must be coupled to the patient with gel or oil. We determined how the quality of coupling affects stone breakage under conditions that simulated patient treatment. Materials and Methods: Experiments were performed with a Dornier® DoLi-50 electromagnetic lithotriptor. The test tank had a clear Mylar® membrane for coupling with the treatment head water cushion. Thus, air pockets trapped at the coupling interface could be photographed for quantitation. Coupling efficiency was assessed using a fiberoptic hydrophone and different coupling regimes were tested for the effect on gypsum stone breakage. Results: The quality of coupling was variable with air pockets covering 1.5% to 19% of the coupling area, resulting in a mean decrease in shock wave amplitude of approximately 20%. Breaking and reestablishing contact, as when a patient is repositioned during treatment, decreased acoustic pressure almost 32%, representing a 57% decrease in acoustic energy transmission. Stone breakage was also decreased when air was trapped in coupling and only 2% coverage by air pockets decreased stone breakage by 20% to 40%. Conclusions: These in vitro results suggest that coupling in lithotripsy can pose a significant barrier to the transmission of shock wave energy to the patient. Stone breakage was sensitive to air pockets at the coupling interface. Recoupling was particularly disruptive, suggesting that repositioning the patient could substantially degrade coupling quality. It seems reasonable that variability in the quality of coupling could contribute to variability in clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2706-2710
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume176
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Lithotripsy
Air
Head
Acoustics
Moving and Lifting Patients
Calcium Sulfate
Water Purification
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Oils
Therapeutics
Gels
Pressure
Membranes

Keywords

  • equipment and supplies
  • lithotripsy
  • urinary calculi

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Air Pockets Trapped During Routine Coupling in Dry Head Lithotripsy Can Significantly Decrease the Delivery of Shock Wave Energy. / Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.; Neucks, Joshua S.; VonDerHaar, R. Jason; Pishchalnikova, Irina V.; Williams, James; McAteer, James A.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 176, No. 6, 12.2006, p. 2706-2710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pishchalnikov, Yuri A. ; Neucks, Joshua S. ; VonDerHaar, R. Jason ; Pishchalnikova, Irina V. ; Williams, James ; McAteer, James A. / Air Pockets Trapped During Routine Coupling in Dry Head Lithotripsy Can Significantly Decrease the Delivery of Shock Wave Energy. In: Journal of Urology. 2006 ; Vol. 176, No. 6. pp. 2706-2710.
@article{c8cba313500a4a49851563e1f32ca06a,
title = "Air Pockets Trapped During Routine Coupling in Dry Head Lithotripsy Can Significantly Decrease the Delivery of Shock Wave Energy",
abstract = "Purpose: Current lithotriptors use a dry treatment head that must be coupled to the patient with gel or oil. We determined how the quality of coupling affects stone breakage under conditions that simulated patient treatment. Materials and Methods: Experiments were performed with a Dornier{\circledR} DoLi-50 electromagnetic lithotriptor. The test tank had a clear Mylar{\circledR} membrane for coupling with the treatment head water cushion. Thus, air pockets trapped at the coupling interface could be photographed for quantitation. Coupling efficiency was assessed using a fiberoptic hydrophone and different coupling regimes were tested for the effect on gypsum stone breakage. Results: The quality of coupling was variable with air pockets covering 1.5{\%} to 19{\%} of the coupling area, resulting in a mean decrease in shock wave amplitude of approximately 20{\%}. Breaking and reestablishing contact, as when a patient is repositioned during treatment, decreased acoustic pressure almost 32{\%}, representing a 57{\%} decrease in acoustic energy transmission. Stone breakage was also decreased when air was trapped in coupling and only 2{\%} coverage by air pockets decreased stone breakage by 20{\%} to 40{\%}. Conclusions: These in vitro results suggest that coupling in lithotripsy can pose a significant barrier to the transmission of shock wave energy to the patient. Stone breakage was sensitive to air pockets at the coupling interface. Recoupling was particularly disruptive, suggesting that repositioning the patient could substantially degrade coupling quality. It seems reasonable that variability in the quality of coupling could contribute to variability in clinical outcomes.",
keywords = "equipment and supplies, lithotripsy, urinary calculi",
author = "Pishchalnikov, {Yuri A.} and Neucks, {Joshua S.} and VonDerHaar, {R. Jason} and Pishchalnikova, {Irina V.} and James Williams and McAteer, {James A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.149",
language = "English",
volume = "176",
pages = "2706--2710",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Air Pockets Trapped During Routine Coupling in Dry Head Lithotripsy Can Significantly Decrease the Delivery of Shock Wave Energy

AU - Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.

AU - Neucks, Joshua S.

AU - VonDerHaar, R. Jason

AU - Pishchalnikova, Irina V.

AU - Williams, James

AU - McAteer, James A.

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Purpose: Current lithotriptors use a dry treatment head that must be coupled to the patient with gel or oil. We determined how the quality of coupling affects stone breakage under conditions that simulated patient treatment. Materials and Methods: Experiments were performed with a Dornier® DoLi-50 electromagnetic lithotriptor. The test tank had a clear Mylar® membrane for coupling with the treatment head water cushion. Thus, air pockets trapped at the coupling interface could be photographed for quantitation. Coupling efficiency was assessed using a fiberoptic hydrophone and different coupling regimes were tested for the effect on gypsum stone breakage. Results: The quality of coupling was variable with air pockets covering 1.5% to 19% of the coupling area, resulting in a mean decrease in shock wave amplitude of approximately 20%. Breaking and reestablishing contact, as when a patient is repositioned during treatment, decreased acoustic pressure almost 32%, representing a 57% decrease in acoustic energy transmission. Stone breakage was also decreased when air was trapped in coupling and only 2% coverage by air pockets decreased stone breakage by 20% to 40%. Conclusions: These in vitro results suggest that coupling in lithotripsy can pose a significant barrier to the transmission of shock wave energy to the patient. Stone breakage was sensitive to air pockets at the coupling interface. Recoupling was particularly disruptive, suggesting that repositioning the patient could substantially degrade coupling quality. It seems reasonable that variability in the quality of coupling could contribute to variability in clinical outcomes.

AB - Purpose: Current lithotriptors use a dry treatment head that must be coupled to the patient with gel or oil. We determined how the quality of coupling affects stone breakage under conditions that simulated patient treatment. Materials and Methods: Experiments were performed with a Dornier® DoLi-50 electromagnetic lithotriptor. The test tank had a clear Mylar® membrane for coupling with the treatment head water cushion. Thus, air pockets trapped at the coupling interface could be photographed for quantitation. Coupling efficiency was assessed using a fiberoptic hydrophone and different coupling regimes were tested for the effect on gypsum stone breakage. Results: The quality of coupling was variable with air pockets covering 1.5% to 19% of the coupling area, resulting in a mean decrease in shock wave amplitude of approximately 20%. Breaking and reestablishing contact, as when a patient is repositioned during treatment, decreased acoustic pressure almost 32%, representing a 57% decrease in acoustic energy transmission. Stone breakage was also decreased when air was trapped in coupling and only 2% coverage by air pockets decreased stone breakage by 20% to 40%. Conclusions: These in vitro results suggest that coupling in lithotripsy can pose a significant barrier to the transmission of shock wave energy to the patient. Stone breakage was sensitive to air pockets at the coupling interface. Recoupling was particularly disruptive, suggesting that repositioning the patient could substantially degrade coupling quality. It seems reasonable that variability in the quality of coupling could contribute to variability in clinical outcomes.

KW - equipment and supplies

KW - lithotripsy

KW - urinary calculi

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750531840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750531840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.149

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.149

M3 - Article

VL - 176

SP - 2706

EP - 2710

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 6

ER -