Airway responsiveness in infants: comparison of inhaled and nasally instilled methacholine.

Robert Tepper, M. Steffan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Airway responsiveness of infants is evaluated during sleep and the infants inhale the bronchial challenge agent via the nasal airway. Since stimulation of the nasal airway may produce bronchoconstriction, it is unclear whether the observed response in the infants results from deposition of the aerosol in the lower airways or from stimulation of nasal receptors. Therefore, in 6 healthy infants we compared the changes in partial expiratory flow-volume (PEFV) curves produced by aerosol inhalation of methacholine and the changes produced by instillation of equivalent doses of methacholine liquid into the nares. Following aerosol, the peak expiratory flow and the flow at functional residual capacity decreased, PEFV curves became concave in shape, and the oxygen saturation (SaO2) decreased. The highest methacholine concentration inhaled by any infant was 1.25 mg/mL. In contrast to aerosol delivery, a maximal methacholine concentration of 10.0 mg/mL was instilled into the nares of all 6 infants without any change in maximal flow at functional respiratory capacity (VmaxFRC) or SaO2. There was a significant decrease in peak flow and flattening of the PEFV curves at higher lung volumes; however, the PEFV curve remained convex in shape at the lower lung volumes. The changes in the PEFV curve following nasal instillation of methacholine are consistent with an increase in nasal resistance and no change in the lower airways. We conclude that the bronchoconstriction observed following inhaled methacholine does not result from stimulation of nasal receptors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-58
Number of pages5
JournalPediatric Pulmonology
Volume16
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1993

Fingerprint

Methacholine Chloride
Nose
Aerosols
Bronchoconstriction
Functional Residual Capacity
Lung
Inhalation
Sleep
Oxygen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Airway responsiveness in infants : comparison of inhaled and nasally instilled methacholine. / Tepper, Robert; Steffan, M.

In: Pediatric Pulmonology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 07.1993, p. 54-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17bebedff1f04fb1b9b049d2c1dd42ca,
title = "Airway responsiveness in infants: comparison of inhaled and nasally instilled methacholine.",
abstract = "Airway responsiveness of infants is evaluated during sleep and the infants inhale the bronchial challenge agent via the nasal airway. Since stimulation of the nasal airway may produce bronchoconstriction, it is unclear whether the observed response in the infants results from deposition of the aerosol in the lower airways or from stimulation of nasal receptors. Therefore, in 6 healthy infants we compared the changes in partial expiratory flow-volume (PEFV) curves produced by aerosol inhalation of methacholine and the changes produced by instillation of equivalent doses of methacholine liquid into the nares. Following aerosol, the peak expiratory flow and the flow at functional residual capacity decreased, PEFV curves became concave in shape, and the oxygen saturation (SaO2) decreased. The highest methacholine concentration inhaled by any infant was 1.25 mg/mL. In contrast to aerosol delivery, a maximal methacholine concentration of 10.0 mg/mL was instilled into the nares of all 6 infants without any change in maximal flow at functional respiratory capacity (VmaxFRC) or SaO2. There was a significant decrease in peak flow and flattening of the PEFV curves at higher lung volumes; however, the PEFV curve remained convex in shape at the lower lung volumes. The changes in the PEFV curve following nasal instillation of methacholine are consistent with an increase in nasal resistance and no change in the lower airways. We conclude that the bronchoconstriction observed following inhaled methacholine does not result from stimulation of nasal receptors.",
author = "Robert Tepper and M. Steffan",
year = "1993",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "54--58",
journal = "Pediatric Pulmonology",
issn = "8755-6863",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Airway responsiveness in infants

T2 - comparison of inhaled and nasally instilled methacholine.

AU - Tepper, Robert

AU - Steffan, M.

PY - 1993/7

Y1 - 1993/7

N2 - Airway responsiveness of infants is evaluated during sleep and the infants inhale the bronchial challenge agent via the nasal airway. Since stimulation of the nasal airway may produce bronchoconstriction, it is unclear whether the observed response in the infants results from deposition of the aerosol in the lower airways or from stimulation of nasal receptors. Therefore, in 6 healthy infants we compared the changes in partial expiratory flow-volume (PEFV) curves produced by aerosol inhalation of methacholine and the changes produced by instillation of equivalent doses of methacholine liquid into the nares. Following aerosol, the peak expiratory flow and the flow at functional residual capacity decreased, PEFV curves became concave in shape, and the oxygen saturation (SaO2) decreased. The highest methacholine concentration inhaled by any infant was 1.25 mg/mL. In contrast to aerosol delivery, a maximal methacholine concentration of 10.0 mg/mL was instilled into the nares of all 6 infants without any change in maximal flow at functional respiratory capacity (VmaxFRC) or SaO2. There was a significant decrease in peak flow and flattening of the PEFV curves at higher lung volumes; however, the PEFV curve remained convex in shape at the lower lung volumes. The changes in the PEFV curve following nasal instillation of methacholine are consistent with an increase in nasal resistance and no change in the lower airways. We conclude that the bronchoconstriction observed following inhaled methacholine does not result from stimulation of nasal receptors.

AB - Airway responsiveness of infants is evaluated during sleep and the infants inhale the bronchial challenge agent via the nasal airway. Since stimulation of the nasal airway may produce bronchoconstriction, it is unclear whether the observed response in the infants results from deposition of the aerosol in the lower airways or from stimulation of nasal receptors. Therefore, in 6 healthy infants we compared the changes in partial expiratory flow-volume (PEFV) curves produced by aerosol inhalation of methacholine and the changes produced by instillation of equivalent doses of methacholine liquid into the nares. Following aerosol, the peak expiratory flow and the flow at functional residual capacity decreased, PEFV curves became concave in shape, and the oxygen saturation (SaO2) decreased. The highest methacholine concentration inhaled by any infant was 1.25 mg/mL. In contrast to aerosol delivery, a maximal methacholine concentration of 10.0 mg/mL was instilled into the nares of all 6 infants without any change in maximal flow at functional respiratory capacity (VmaxFRC) or SaO2. There was a significant decrease in peak flow and flattening of the PEFV curves at higher lung volumes; however, the PEFV curve remained convex in shape at the lower lung volumes. The changes in the PEFV curve following nasal instillation of methacholine are consistent with an increase in nasal resistance and no change in the lower airways. We conclude that the bronchoconstriction observed following inhaled methacholine does not result from stimulation of nasal receptors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027637587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027637587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8414742

AN - SCOPUS:0027637587

VL - 16

SP - 54

EP - 58

JO - Pediatric Pulmonology

JF - Pediatric Pulmonology

SN - 8755-6863

IS - 1

ER -