Aligning use of intensive care with patient values in the USA: past, present, and future

Alison E. Turnbull, Gabriel Bosslet, Erin K. Kross

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

For more than three decades, both medical professionals and the public have worried that many patients receive non-beneficial care in US intensive care units during their final months of life. Some of these patients wish to avoid severe cognitive and physical impairments, and protracted deaths in the hospital setting. Recognising when intensive care will not restore a person's health, and helping patients and families embrace goals related to symptom relief, interpersonal connection, or spiritual fulfilment are central challenges of critical care practice in the USA. We review trials from the past decade of interventions designed to address these challenges, and present reasons why evaluating, comparing, and implementing these interventions have been difficult. Careful scrutiny of the design and interpretation of past trials can show why improving goal concordant care has been so elusive, and suggest new directions for the next generation of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)626-638
Number of pages13
JournalThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
Health
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Aligning use of intensive care with patient values in the USA : past, present, and future. / Turnbull, Alison E.; Bosslet, Gabriel; Kross, Erin K.

In: The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. 626-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{558682bab86644c7bd1b61350b6ae7e7,
title = "Aligning use of intensive care with patient values in the USA: past, present, and future",
abstract = "For more than three decades, both medical professionals and the public have worried that many patients receive non-beneficial care in US intensive care units during their final months of life. Some of these patients wish to avoid severe cognitive and physical impairments, and protracted deaths in the hospital setting. Recognising when intensive care will not restore a person's health, and helping patients and families embrace goals related to symptom relief, interpersonal connection, or spiritual fulfilment are central challenges of critical care practice in the USA. We review trials from the past decade of interventions designed to address these challenges, and present reasons why evaluating, comparing, and implementing these interventions have been difficult. Careful scrutiny of the design and interpretation of past trials can show why improving goal concordant care has been so elusive, and suggest new directions for the next generation of research.",
author = "Turnbull, {Alison E.} and Gabriel Bosslet and Kross, {Erin K.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30087-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "626--638",
journal = "The Lancet Respiratory Medicine",
issn = "2213-2600",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning use of intensive care with patient values in the USA

T2 - past, present, and future

AU - Turnbull, Alison E.

AU - Bosslet, Gabriel

AU - Kross, Erin K.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - For more than three decades, both medical professionals and the public have worried that many patients receive non-beneficial care in US intensive care units during their final months of life. Some of these patients wish to avoid severe cognitive and physical impairments, and protracted deaths in the hospital setting. Recognising when intensive care will not restore a person's health, and helping patients and families embrace goals related to symptom relief, interpersonal connection, or spiritual fulfilment are central challenges of critical care practice in the USA. We review trials from the past decade of interventions designed to address these challenges, and present reasons why evaluating, comparing, and implementing these interventions have been difficult. Careful scrutiny of the design and interpretation of past trials can show why improving goal concordant care has been so elusive, and suggest new directions for the next generation of research.

AB - For more than three decades, both medical professionals and the public have worried that many patients receive non-beneficial care in US intensive care units during their final months of life. Some of these patients wish to avoid severe cognitive and physical impairments, and protracted deaths in the hospital setting. Recognising when intensive care will not restore a person's health, and helping patients and families embrace goals related to symptom relief, interpersonal connection, or spiritual fulfilment are central challenges of critical care practice in the USA. We review trials from the past decade of interventions designed to address these challenges, and present reasons why evaluating, comparing, and implementing these interventions have been difficult. Careful scrutiny of the design and interpretation of past trials can show why improving goal concordant care has been so elusive, and suggest new directions for the next generation of research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067681007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067681007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30087-6

DO - 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30087-6

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31122892

AN - SCOPUS:85067681007

VL - 7

SP - 626

EP - 638

JO - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

JF - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

SN - 2213-2600

IS - 7

ER -