American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001 Presidential Initiative: Impact of regulatory burdens on quality cancer care

Lawrence Einhorn, Jenifer Levinson, Susan Li, Laurie Lamar, Deborah Kamin, Dan Mendelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2001 Presidential Initiative to assess the administrative burden of payer documentation requirements and their impact on oncology practice. Methods: The study consisted of a physician questionnaire and an activity log. Site visits were conducted to support survey data. Analysis included 2,493 questionnaires and 1,115 activity logs; data were also collected from site visits to 10 oncology practices. Results: Increased documentation was the greatest concern among respondents, greater even than the stress of dealing with death and dying. More than 97% of survey respondents reported an increase in documentation (averaging 1.4 h/d) and 77% reported an increase in work hours because of documentation in the past 5 years. As a result, more than 40% of respondents reported decreases in key aspects of patient care and decreases in teaching (48%) and research (39%). Site visit data demonstrate similar trends. Conclusion: It is critical to find ways to decrease physician burden without decreasing the ability to prevent fraud and abuse. Reforms include provisions in a recently passed bill in the United States House of Representatives to streamline Medicare regulation and increase physician education. To address oncology-specific concerns, changes also should be made to supervision requirements for residents and fellows and evaluation and management documentation for oncology follow-up visits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4722-4726
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume20
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Documentation
Neoplasms
Physicians
Fraud
Medicare
Surveys and Questionnaires
Patient Care
Teaching
Education
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001 Presidential Initiative : Impact of regulatory burdens on quality cancer care. / Einhorn, Lawrence; Levinson, Jenifer; Li, Susan; Lamar, Laurie; Kamin, Deborah; Mendelson, Dan.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 20, No. 24, 15.12.2002, p. 4722-4726.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Einhorn, Lawrence ; Levinson, Jenifer ; Li, Susan ; Lamar, Laurie ; Kamin, Deborah ; Mendelson, Dan. / American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001 Presidential Initiative : Impact of regulatory burdens on quality cancer care. In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2002 ; Vol. 20, No. 24. pp. 4722-4726.
@article{4f074ab4bf50488081c9c0bb4e8096f1,
title = "American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001 Presidential Initiative: Impact of regulatory burdens on quality cancer care",
abstract = "Purpose: This study was conducted as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2001 Presidential Initiative to assess the administrative burden of payer documentation requirements and their impact on oncology practice. Methods: The study consisted of a physician questionnaire and an activity log. Site visits were conducted to support survey data. Analysis included 2,493 questionnaires and 1,115 activity logs; data were also collected from site visits to 10 oncology practices. Results: Increased documentation was the greatest concern among respondents, greater even than the stress of dealing with death and dying. More than 97{\%} of survey respondents reported an increase in documentation (averaging 1.4 h/d) and 77{\%} reported an increase in work hours because of documentation in the past 5 years. As a result, more than 40{\%} of respondents reported decreases in key aspects of patient care and decreases in teaching (48{\%}) and research (39{\%}). Site visit data demonstrate similar trends. Conclusion: It is critical to find ways to decrease physician burden without decreasing the ability to prevent fraud and abuse. Reforms include provisions in a recently passed bill in the United States House of Representatives to streamline Medicare regulation and increase physician education. To address oncology-specific concerns, changes also should be made to supervision requirements for residents and fellows and evaluation and management documentation for oncology follow-up visits.",
author = "Lawrence Einhorn and Jenifer Levinson and Susan Li and Laurie Lamar and Deborah Kamin and Dan Mendelson",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2002.02.011",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "4722--4726",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001 Presidential Initiative

T2 - Impact of regulatory burdens on quality cancer care

AU - Einhorn, Lawrence

AU - Levinson, Jenifer

AU - Li, Susan

AU - Lamar, Laurie

AU - Kamin, Deborah

AU - Mendelson, Dan

PY - 2002/12/15

Y1 - 2002/12/15

N2 - Purpose: This study was conducted as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2001 Presidential Initiative to assess the administrative burden of payer documentation requirements and their impact on oncology practice. Methods: The study consisted of a physician questionnaire and an activity log. Site visits were conducted to support survey data. Analysis included 2,493 questionnaires and 1,115 activity logs; data were also collected from site visits to 10 oncology practices. Results: Increased documentation was the greatest concern among respondents, greater even than the stress of dealing with death and dying. More than 97% of survey respondents reported an increase in documentation (averaging 1.4 h/d) and 77% reported an increase in work hours because of documentation in the past 5 years. As a result, more than 40% of respondents reported decreases in key aspects of patient care and decreases in teaching (48%) and research (39%). Site visit data demonstrate similar trends. Conclusion: It is critical to find ways to decrease physician burden without decreasing the ability to prevent fraud and abuse. Reforms include provisions in a recently passed bill in the United States House of Representatives to streamline Medicare regulation and increase physician education. To address oncology-specific concerns, changes also should be made to supervision requirements for residents and fellows and evaluation and management documentation for oncology follow-up visits.

AB - Purpose: This study was conducted as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2001 Presidential Initiative to assess the administrative burden of payer documentation requirements and their impact on oncology practice. Methods: The study consisted of a physician questionnaire and an activity log. Site visits were conducted to support survey data. Analysis included 2,493 questionnaires and 1,115 activity logs; data were also collected from site visits to 10 oncology practices. Results: Increased documentation was the greatest concern among respondents, greater even than the stress of dealing with death and dying. More than 97% of survey respondents reported an increase in documentation (averaging 1.4 h/d) and 77% reported an increase in work hours because of documentation in the past 5 years. As a result, more than 40% of respondents reported decreases in key aspects of patient care and decreases in teaching (48%) and research (39%). Site visit data demonstrate similar trends. Conclusion: It is critical to find ways to decrease physician burden without decreasing the ability to prevent fraud and abuse. Reforms include provisions in a recently passed bill in the United States House of Representatives to streamline Medicare regulation and increase physician education. To address oncology-specific concerns, changes also should be made to supervision requirements for residents and fellows and evaluation and management documentation for oncology follow-up visits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037115424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037115424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.011

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 12488419

AN - SCOPUS:0037115424

VL - 20

SP - 4722

EP - 4726

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 24

ER -