An assessment of the value of triple endoscopy in the evaluation of head and neck cancer patients

David E. Schuller, Michael H. Fritsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of triple endoscopy in the routine diagnostic evaluation of head and neck cancer patients to (1) ascertain the accuracy and safety of this approach in identifying multiple neoplasms and (2) determine if such an approach is justifiable rather than relying on radiographic examinations coupled with the routine head and neck exam including indirect laryngoscopy. in this series, The incidence of second malignancies was found to be 11.3%, consistent with other reports in the medical literature. There were no complications noted as a result of triple endoscopy. There were no instances where the second malignancy was not diagnosed prior to triple endoscopy with either the physical exam or routine roentgenograms. There were no incidences where the treatment program of the primary tumor was altered by the information obtained at triple endoscopy. The results of this single institutional study suggest that triple endoscopy need not be a routine component of the diagnostic evaluation of every patient with head and neck cancer. However, every patient should probably have a thorough physical examination coupled with chest and esophageal roentgenograms to search for a simultaneous secondary neoplasm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)156-158
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1986

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Endoscopy
Second Primary Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Laryngoscopy
Incidence
Physical Examination
Neck
Thorax
Head
Safety
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • multiple primaries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

An assessment of the value of triple endoscopy in the evaluation of head and neck cancer patients. / Schuller, David E.; Fritsch, Michael H.

In: Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 07.1986, p. 156-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schuller, David E. ; Fritsch, Michael H. / An assessment of the value of triple endoscopy in the evaluation of head and neck cancer patients. In: Journal of Surgical Oncology. 1986 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 156-158.
@article{1fa579eeab5245a0b29db5b9959f9206,
title = "An assessment of the value of triple endoscopy in the evaluation of head and neck cancer patients",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of triple endoscopy in the routine diagnostic evaluation of head and neck cancer patients to (1) ascertain the accuracy and safety of this approach in identifying multiple neoplasms and (2) determine if such an approach is justifiable rather than relying on radiographic examinations coupled with the routine head and neck exam including indirect laryngoscopy. in this series, The incidence of second malignancies was found to be 11.3{\%}, consistent with other reports in the medical literature. There were no complications noted as a result of triple endoscopy. There were no instances where the second malignancy was not diagnosed prior to triple endoscopy with either the physical exam or routine roentgenograms. There were no incidences where the treatment program of the primary tumor was altered by the information obtained at triple endoscopy. The results of this single institutional study suggest that triple endoscopy need not be a routine component of the diagnostic evaluation of every patient with head and neck cancer. However, every patient should probably have a thorough physical examination coupled with chest and esophageal roentgenograms to search for a simultaneous secondary neoplasm.",
keywords = "multiple primaries",
author = "Schuller, {David E.} and Fritsch, {Michael H.}",
year = "1986",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/jso.2930320308",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "156--158",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0022-4790",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of the value of triple endoscopy in the evaluation of head and neck cancer patients

AU - Schuller, David E.

AU - Fritsch, Michael H.

PY - 1986/7

Y1 - 1986/7

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of triple endoscopy in the routine diagnostic evaluation of head and neck cancer patients to (1) ascertain the accuracy and safety of this approach in identifying multiple neoplasms and (2) determine if such an approach is justifiable rather than relying on radiographic examinations coupled with the routine head and neck exam including indirect laryngoscopy. in this series, The incidence of second malignancies was found to be 11.3%, consistent with other reports in the medical literature. There were no complications noted as a result of triple endoscopy. There were no instances where the second malignancy was not diagnosed prior to triple endoscopy with either the physical exam or routine roentgenograms. There were no incidences where the treatment program of the primary tumor was altered by the information obtained at triple endoscopy. The results of this single institutional study suggest that triple endoscopy need not be a routine component of the diagnostic evaluation of every patient with head and neck cancer. However, every patient should probably have a thorough physical examination coupled with chest and esophageal roentgenograms to search for a simultaneous secondary neoplasm.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of triple endoscopy in the routine diagnostic evaluation of head and neck cancer patients to (1) ascertain the accuracy and safety of this approach in identifying multiple neoplasms and (2) determine if such an approach is justifiable rather than relying on radiographic examinations coupled with the routine head and neck exam including indirect laryngoscopy. in this series, The incidence of second malignancies was found to be 11.3%, consistent with other reports in the medical literature. There were no complications noted as a result of triple endoscopy. There were no instances where the second malignancy was not diagnosed prior to triple endoscopy with either the physical exam or routine roentgenograms. There were no incidences where the treatment program of the primary tumor was altered by the information obtained at triple endoscopy. The results of this single institutional study suggest that triple endoscopy need not be a routine component of the diagnostic evaluation of every patient with head and neck cancer. However, every patient should probably have a thorough physical examination coupled with chest and esophageal roentgenograms to search for a simultaneous secondary neoplasm.

KW - multiple primaries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022499567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022499567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jso.2930320308

DO - 10.1002/jso.2930320308

M3 - Article

C2 - 3736051

AN - SCOPUS:0022499567

VL - 32

SP - 156

EP - 158

JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0022-4790

IS - 3

ER -