An empirical investigation into factors affecting patient cancellations and no-shows at outpatient clinics

John B. Norris, Chetan Kumar, Suresh Chand, Herbert Moskowitz, Steve A. Shade, Deanna Willis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Medical facilities competing in the US Healthcare system must consider the likelihood of patient attendance when scheduling appointments. This paper analyzes a robust, panel style registration data set from 9 outpatient facilities consisting of 5 years of patients' attendance outcomes. The three outcomes, arrivals, cancellations prior to the scheduled appointment and failure to arrive (no-shows), distinguish this paper from prior empirical research that typically treats patient arrivals as a dichotomous outcome by grouping cancellations and no-shows together or excluding cancellations. Distinguishing cancellations from no-shows reveal different effects from patient age and appointment slot day and time. Findings focus on the variables having the greatest impact on attendance and conclude with the difficulty in predicting individual appointment outcomes and the observation that a rather small number of patients represent a disproportionately large percentage of no-shows. Four factors that have the greatest association with patient nonattendance are lead time (call appointment interval), financial payer (typically insurance provider), patient age, and the patient's prior attendance history. Lead time has the greatest impact and is the most addressable, whereas a patient's age, insurance provider and, to some extent, patient behavior cannot be altered. Results reveal quite a paradox that scheduling systems designed to help ensure full utilization on a future date also contribute to underutilization by increasing the chance that patients will not show.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-443
Number of pages16
JournalDecision Support Systems
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Insurance
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Scheduling
Appointments and Schedules
Empirical investigation
Cancellation
Factors
Outpatient
Clinic
Empirical Research
Outpatients
History
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Cancellations
  • Healthcare
  • Missed appointments
  • No-shows
  • Patient attendance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

An empirical investigation into factors affecting patient cancellations and no-shows at outpatient clinics. / Norris, John B.; Kumar, Chetan; Chand, Suresh; Moskowitz, Herbert; Shade, Steve A.; Willis, Deanna.

In: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 57, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 428-443.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Norris, John B. ; Kumar, Chetan ; Chand, Suresh ; Moskowitz, Herbert ; Shade, Steve A. ; Willis, Deanna. / An empirical investigation into factors affecting patient cancellations and no-shows at outpatient clinics. In: Decision Support Systems. 2014 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 428-443.
@article{c598c967d8874a0f8432c7bdfafbb4f8,
title = "An empirical investigation into factors affecting patient cancellations and no-shows at outpatient clinics",
abstract = "Medical facilities competing in the US Healthcare system must consider the likelihood of patient attendance when scheduling appointments. This paper analyzes a robust, panel style registration data set from 9 outpatient facilities consisting of 5 years of patients' attendance outcomes. The three outcomes, arrivals, cancellations prior to the scheduled appointment and failure to arrive (no-shows), distinguish this paper from prior empirical research that typically treats patient arrivals as a dichotomous outcome by grouping cancellations and no-shows together or excluding cancellations. Distinguishing cancellations from no-shows reveal different effects from patient age and appointment slot day and time. Findings focus on the variables having the greatest impact on attendance and conclude with the difficulty in predicting individual appointment outcomes and the observation that a rather small number of patients represent a disproportionately large percentage of no-shows. Four factors that have the greatest association with patient nonattendance are lead time (call appointment interval), financial payer (typically insurance provider), patient age, and the patient's prior attendance history. Lead time has the greatest impact and is the most addressable, whereas a patient's age, insurance provider and, to some extent, patient behavior cannot be altered. Results reveal quite a paradox that scheduling systems designed to help ensure full utilization on a future date also contribute to underutilization by increasing the chance that patients will not show.",
keywords = "Cancellations, Healthcare, Missed appointments, No-shows, Patient attendance",
author = "Norris, {John B.} and Chetan Kumar and Suresh Chand and Herbert Moskowitz and Shade, {Steve A.} and Deanna Willis",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.048",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "428--443",
journal = "Decision Support Systems",
issn = "0167-9236",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical investigation into factors affecting patient cancellations and no-shows at outpatient clinics

AU - Norris, John B.

AU - Kumar, Chetan

AU - Chand, Suresh

AU - Moskowitz, Herbert

AU - Shade, Steve A.

AU - Willis, Deanna

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Medical facilities competing in the US Healthcare system must consider the likelihood of patient attendance when scheduling appointments. This paper analyzes a robust, panel style registration data set from 9 outpatient facilities consisting of 5 years of patients' attendance outcomes. The three outcomes, arrivals, cancellations prior to the scheduled appointment and failure to arrive (no-shows), distinguish this paper from prior empirical research that typically treats patient arrivals as a dichotomous outcome by grouping cancellations and no-shows together or excluding cancellations. Distinguishing cancellations from no-shows reveal different effects from patient age and appointment slot day and time. Findings focus on the variables having the greatest impact on attendance and conclude with the difficulty in predicting individual appointment outcomes and the observation that a rather small number of patients represent a disproportionately large percentage of no-shows. Four factors that have the greatest association with patient nonattendance are lead time (call appointment interval), financial payer (typically insurance provider), patient age, and the patient's prior attendance history. Lead time has the greatest impact and is the most addressable, whereas a patient's age, insurance provider and, to some extent, patient behavior cannot be altered. Results reveal quite a paradox that scheduling systems designed to help ensure full utilization on a future date also contribute to underutilization by increasing the chance that patients will not show.

AB - Medical facilities competing in the US Healthcare system must consider the likelihood of patient attendance when scheduling appointments. This paper analyzes a robust, panel style registration data set from 9 outpatient facilities consisting of 5 years of patients' attendance outcomes. The three outcomes, arrivals, cancellations prior to the scheduled appointment and failure to arrive (no-shows), distinguish this paper from prior empirical research that typically treats patient arrivals as a dichotomous outcome by grouping cancellations and no-shows together or excluding cancellations. Distinguishing cancellations from no-shows reveal different effects from patient age and appointment slot day and time. Findings focus on the variables having the greatest impact on attendance and conclude with the difficulty in predicting individual appointment outcomes and the observation that a rather small number of patients represent a disproportionately large percentage of no-shows. Four factors that have the greatest association with patient nonattendance are lead time (call appointment interval), financial payer (typically insurance provider), patient age, and the patient's prior attendance history. Lead time has the greatest impact and is the most addressable, whereas a patient's age, insurance provider and, to some extent, patient behavior cannot be altered. Results reveal quite a paradox that scheduling systems designed to help ensure full utilization on a future date also contribute to underutilization by increasing the chance that patients will not show.

KW - Cancellations

KW - Healthcare

KW - Missed appointments

KW - No-shows

KW - Patient attendance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892364658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892364658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.048

DO - 10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.048

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84892364658

VL - 57

SP - 428

EP - 443

JO - Decision Support Systems

JF - Decision Support Systems

SN - 0167-9236

IS - 1

ER -