An Incentive Compensation System That Rewards Individual and Corporate Productivity

Deanna Willis, Gaylen M. Kelton, Robert M. Saywell, Richard Kiovsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: An economically mature health care market has led to increased cost competition. Subsequently, a perceived need for productivity-based physician compensation has developed. While some institutions have rewarded individual productivity based on specific facets of academic responsibility, such as teaching, research, and patient care, we chose to develop an incentive compensation system that rewards both individual and group productivity. Program Development: We developed a physician incentive compensation system that rewards individual and group productivity by capturing multiple aspects of work activity. Faculty members are given compensation value points for clinical productivity, scholarship activities, teaching activities, service activities, and achievement of the department's goals. The system was implemented in a graduated fashion in the Department of Family Medicine at Indiana University beginning July 1, 2000. Program Evaluation: In April 2003, all faculty physicians (n=18) participated in a survey about the compensation system. The majority of faculty view the system as a necessity for the department (72.2%); 35.2% were satisfied with the system overall; 35.3% were neutral; and 27.4% were dissatisfied or not sure of their overall satisfaction. Conclusions: A comprehensive physician incentive compensation system incorporating department goals can be designed and implemented in an academic setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)270-278
Number of pages9
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume36
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

Reward
Compensation and Redress
Motivation
Efficiency
Physicians
Teaching
Program Development
Health Care Sector
Program Evaluation
Patient Care
Medicine
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

An Incentive Compensation System That Rewards Individual and Corporate Productivity. / Willis, Deanna; Kelton, Gaylen M.; Saywell, Robert M.; Kiovsky, Richard.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 4, 04.2004, p. 270-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Willis, Deanna ; Kelton, Gaylen M. ; Saywell, Robert M. ; Kiovsky, Richard. / An Incentive Compensation System That Rewards Individual and Corporate Productivity. In: Family Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 270-278.
@article{2dc7a8f886d2485982a7f929c817e47d,
title = "An Incentive Compensation System That Rewards Individual and Corporate Productivity",
abstract = "Introduction: An economically mature health care market has led to increased cost competition. Subsequently, a perceived need for productivity-based physician compensation has developed. While some institutions have rewarded individual productivity based on specific facets of academic responsibility, such as teaching, research, and patient care, we chose to develop an incentive compensation system that rewards both individual and group productivity. Program Development: We developed a physician incentive compensation system that rewards individual and group productivity by capturing multiple aspects of work activity. Faculty members are given compensation value points for clinical productivity, scholarship activities, teaching activities, service activities, and achievement of the department's goals. The system was implemented in a graduated fashion in the Department of Family Medicine at Indiana University beginning July 1, 2000. Program Evaluation: In April 2003, all faculty physicians (n=18) participated in a survey about the compensation system. The majority of faculty view the system as a necessity for the department (72.2{\%}); 35.2{\%} were satisfied with the system overall; 35.3{\%} were neutral; and 27.4{\%} were dissatisfied or not sure of their overall satisfaction. Conclusions: A comprehensive physician incentive compensation system incorporating department goals can be designed and implemented in an academic setting.",
author = "Deanna Willis and Kelton, {Gaylen M.} and Saywell, {Robert M.} and Richard Kiovsky",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "270--278",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Incentive Compensation System That Rewards Individual and Corporate Productivity

AU - Willis, Deanna

AU - Kelton, Gaylen M.

AU - Saywell, Robert M.

AU - Kiovsky, Richard

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - Introduction: An economically mature health care market has led to increased cost competition. Subsequently, a perceived need for productivity-based physician compensation has developed. While some institutions have rewarded individual productivity based on specific facets of academic responsibility, such as teaching, research, and patient care, we chose to develop an incentive compensation system that rewards both individual and group productivity. Program Development: We developed a physician incentive compensation system that rewards individual and group productivity by capturing multiple aspects of work activity. Faculty members are given compensation value points for clinical productivity, scholarship activities, teaching activities, service activities, and achievement of the department's goals. The system was implemented in a graduated fashion in the Department of Family Medicine at Indiana University beginning July 1, 2000. Program Evaluation: In April 2003, all faculty physicians (n=18) participated in a survey about the compensation system. The majority of faculty view the system as a necessity for the department (72.2%); 35.2% were satisfied with the system overall; 35.3% were neutral; and 27.4% were dissatisfied or not sure of their overall satisfaction. Conclusions: A comprehensive physician incentive compensation system incorporating department goals can be designed and implemented in an academic setting.

AB - Introduction: An economically mature health care market has led to increased cost competition. Subsequently, a perceived need for productivity-based physician compensation has developed. While some institutions have rewarded individual productivity based on specific facets of academic responsibility, such as teaching, research, and patient care, we chose to develop an incentive compensation system that rewards both individual and group productivity. Program Development: We developed a physician incentive compensation system that rewards individual and group productivity by capturing multiple aspects of work activity. Faculty members are given compensation value points for clinical productivity, scholarship activities, teaching activities, service activities, and achievement of the department's goals. The system was implemented in a graduated fashion in the Department of Family Medicine at Indiana University beginning July 1, 2000. Program Evaluation: In April 2003, all faculty physicians (n=18) participated in a survey about the compensation system. The majority of faculty view the system as a necessity for the department (72.2%); 35.2% were satisfied with the system overall; 35.3% were neutral; and 27.4% were dissatisfied or not sure of their overall satisfaction. Conclusions: A comprehensive physician incentive compensation system incorporating department goals can be designed and implemented in an academic setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942519240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942519240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 270

EP - 278

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 4

ER -