Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty

William Capello, T. M. Trancik, G. Misamore, R. Eaton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Results of revision of 24 resurfacing hip prostheses followed up for a minimum of one year are encouraging. The average Iowa Hip Rating after salvage was higher than the average highest rating prior to failure of the original resurfacing procedure. There were no intraoperative complications in revising any of the failed resurfacing procedures. Results of revision of the failed component of a resurfacing procedure are comparable with those of conversion to a conventional hip arthroplasty. Thorough, prompt evaluation of hip pain in recipients of a hip resurfacing procedure is necessary for preservation of remaining bone stock. In comparison to revision of conventional hip arthroplasty, revision of failed resurfacing hip arthroplasty is technically easier and has a better prognosis in providing the patient with a pain-free, functional hip.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-55
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
VolumeNo. 170
StatePublished - 1982

Fingerprint

Reoperation
Arthroplasty
Hip
Hip Prosthesis
Intraoperative Complications
Bone and Bones
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty. / Capello, William; Trancik, T. M.; Misamore, G.; Eaton, R.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. No. 170, 1982, p. 50-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Capello, William ; Trancik, T. M. ; Misamore, G. ; Eaton, R. / Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1982 ; Vol. No. 170. pp. 50-55.
@article{9119787a7cbb4d39b28ecce8a7ba69a9,
title = "Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty",
abstract = "Results of revision of 24 resurfacing hip prostheses followed up for a minimum of one year are encouraging. The average Iowa Hip Rating after salvage was higher than the average highest rating prior to failure of the original resurfacing procedure. There were no intraoperative complications in revising any of the failed resurfacing procedures. Results of revision of the failed component of a resurfacing procedure are comparable with those of conversion to a conventional hip arthroplasty. Thorough, prompt evaluation of hip pain in recipients of a hip resurfacing procedure is necessary for preservation of remaining bone stock. In comparison to revision of conventional hip arthroplasty, revision of failed resurfacing hip arthroplasty is technically easier and has a better prognosis in providing the patient with a pain-free, functional hip.",
author = "William Capello and Trancik, {T. M.} and G. Misamore and R. Eaton",
year = "1982",
language = "English",
volume = "No. 170",
pages = "50--55",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty

AU - Capello, William

AU - Trancik, T. M.

AU - Misamore, G.

AU - Eaton, R.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Results of revision of 24 resurfacing hip prostheses followed up for a minimum of one year are encouraging. The average Iowa Hip Rating after salvage was higher than the average highest rating prior to failure of the original resurfacing procedure. There were no intraoperative complications in revising any of the failed resurfacing procedures. Results of revision of the failed component of a resurfacing procedure are comparable with those of conversion to a conventional hip arthroplasty. Thorough, prompt evaluation of hip pain in recipients of a hip resurfacing procedure is necessary for preservation of remaining bone stock. In comparison to revision of conventional hip arthroplasty, revision of failed resurfacing hip arthroplasty is technically easier and has a better prognosis in providing the patient with a pain-free, functional hip.

AB - Results of revision of 24 resurfacing hip prostheses followed up for a minimum of one year are encouraging. The average Iowa Hip Rating after salvage was higher than the average highest rating prior to failure of the original resurfacing procedure. There were no intraoperative complications in revising any of the failed resurfacing procedures. Results of revision of the failed component of a resurfacing procedure are comparable with those of conversion to a conventional hip arthroplasty. Thorough, prompt evaluation of hip pain in recipients of a hip resurfacing procedure is necessary for preservation of remaining bone stock. In comparison to revision of conventional hip arthroplasty, revision of failed resurfacing hip arthroplasty is technically easier and has a better prognosis in providing the patient with a pain-free, functional hip.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019955715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019955715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7127964

AN - SCOPUS:0019955715

VL - No. 170

SP - 50

EP - 55

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

ER -