Anemia versus transfusion

does blood conservation increase the risk of complications?

Brian Mullis, Erica Fisk, DeWayne Weaver, Qianqian Zhao, Joanne Daggy, Paul E. Di Cesare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Orthopedic trauma patients are routinely transfused for anemia even when asymptomatic at rest, despite there being relatively little scientific evidence as to what level of anemia can be safely tolerated. Some surgeons prefer a more liberal approach, transfusing to keep hemoglobin (Hgb) levels at 7.0 g/dL or higher; others prefer a more conservative approach, allowing Hgb levels to drop below 7.0 g/dL. We conducted a study to determine if a more conservative approach might put patients at higher risk of complications of severe anemia. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 104 patients who were treated by a single surgeon at a level I academic trauma center and who were followed up for at least 1 year. Patients (ages 18-50 years) were divided into 2 groups by lowest Hgb level before first transfusion-under 7.0 g/dL and 7.0 g/dL or higher-and then by whether they had been transfused. Logistic regression analysis was performed. The primary outcome was postoperative complication. There was no increased risk of complication related to anemia (P = .3). However, there was a significant risk of complication related to transfusion (P <.01). Furthermore, there was a dose-dependent effect with each unit transfused (P = .02). In young, healthy, asymptomatic orthopedic trauma patients, a more conservative transfusion strategy (vs a more liberal strategy) did not appear to carry higher risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E11-E16
JournalAmerican journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)
Volume44
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Blood Transfusion
Anemia
Hemoglobins
Orthopedics
Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Anemia versus transfusion : does blood conservation increase the risk of complications? / Mullis, Brian; Fisk, Erica; Weaver, DeWayne; Zhao, Qianqian; Daggy, Joanne; Di Cesare, Paul E.

In: American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.), Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. E11-E16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mullis, Brian ; Fisk, Erica ; Weaver, DeWayne ; Zhao, Qianqian ; Daggy, Joanne ; Di Cesare, Paul E. / Anemia versus transfusion : does blood conservation increase the risk of complications?. In: American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.). 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. E11-E16.
@article{d3dd037d47e740e08fa46ae605240386,
title = "Anemia versus transfusion: does blood conservation increase the risk of complications?",
abstract = "Orthopedic trauma patients are routinely transfused for anemia even when asymptomatic at rest, despite there being relatively little scientific evidence as to what level of anemia can be safely tolerated. Some surgeons prefer a more liberal approach, transfusing to keep hemoglobin (Hgb) levels at 7.0 g/dL or higher; others prefer a more conservative approach, allowing Hgb levels to drop below 7.0 g/dL. We conducted a study to determine if a more conservative approach might put patients at higher risk of complications of severe anemia. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 104 patients who were treated by a single surgeon at a level I academic trauma center and who were followed up for at least 1 year. Patients (ages 18-50 years) were divided into 2 groups by lowest Hgb level before first transfusion-under 7.0 g/dL and 7.0 g/dL or higher-and then by whether they had been transfused. Logistic regression analysis was performed. The primary outcome was postoperative complication. There was no increased risk of complication related to anemia (P = .3). However, there was a significant risk of complication related to transfusion (P <.01). Furthermore, there was a dose-dependent effect with each unit transfused (P = .02). In young, healthy, asymptomatic orthopedic trauma patients, a more conservative transfusion strategy (vs a more liberal strategy) did not appear to carry higher risk.",
author = "Brian Mullis and Erica Fisk and DeWayne Weaver and Qianqian Zhao and Joanne Daggy and {Di Cesare}, {Paul E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "E11--E16",
journal = "American Journal of Orthopedics",
issn = "1078-4519",
publisher = "Quadrant Healthcom Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anemia versus transfusion

T2 - does blood conservation increase the risk of complications?

AU - Mullis, Brian

AU - Fisk, Erica

AU - Weaver, DeWayne

AU - Zhao, Qianqian

AU - Daggy, Joanne

AU - Di Cesare, Paul E.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Orthopedic trauma patients are routinely transfused for anemia even when asymptomatic at rest, despite there being relatively little scientific evidence as to what level of anemia can be safely tolerated. Some surgeons prefer a more liberal approach, transfusing to keep hemoglobin (Hgb) levels at 7.0 g/dL or higher; others prefer a more conservative approach, allowing Hgb levels to drop below 7.0 g/dL. We conducted a study to determine if a more conservative approach might put patients at higher risk of complications of severe anemia. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 104 patients who were treated by a single surgeon at a level I academic trauma center and who were followed up for at least 1 year. Patients (ages 18-50 years) were divided into 2 groups by lowest Hgb level before first transfusion-under 7.0 g/dL and 7.0 g/dL or higher-and then by whether they had been transfused. Logistic regression analysis was performed. The primary outcome was postoperative complication. There was no increased risk of complication related to anemia (P = .3). However, there was a significant risk of complication related to transfusion (P <.01). Furthermore, there was a dose-dependent effect with each unit transfused (P = .02). In young, healthy, asymptomatic orthopedic trauma patients, a more conservative transfusion strategy (vs a more liberal strategy) did not appear to carry higher risk.

AB - Orthopedic trauma patients are routinely transfused for anemia even when asymptomatic at rest, despite there being relatively little scientific evidence as to what level of anemia can be safely tolerated. Some surgeons prefer a more liberal approach, transfusing to keep hemoglobin (Hgb) levels at 7.0 g/dL or higher; others prefer a more conservative approach, allowing Hgb levels to drop below 7.0 g/dL. We conducted a study to determine if a more conservative approach might put patients at higher risk of complications of severe anemia. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 104 patients who were treated by a single surgeon at a level I academic trauma center and who were followed up for at least 1 year. Patients (ages 18-50 years) were divided into 2 groups by lowest Hgb level before first transfusion-under 7.0 g/dL and 7.0 g/dL or higher-and then by whether they had been transfused. Logistic regression analysis was performed. The primary outcome was postoperative complication. There was no increased risk of complication related to anemia (P = .3). However, there was a significant risk of complication related to transfusion (P <.01). Furthermore, there was a dose-dependent effect with each unit transfused (P = .02). In young, healthy, asymptomatic orthopedic trauma patients, a more conservative transfusion strategy (vs a more liberal strategy) did not appear to carry higher risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929939323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929939323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - E11-E16

JO - American Journal of Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthopedics

SN - 1078-4519

IS - 1

ER -