Angioscopic valvulotomy: Evaluation of a new miniaturized prototype

Michael Dalsing, Anne Marie Desanto, David A. Heimansohn, Thomas Davis, Michael Malczenski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares valvulotomy performed by a new experimental instrument delivered through the angioscope with the standard technique used in the in situarterial bypass procedure. Eighteen mongrel dogs (≥ 20 kg) were anesthetized and both femoral veins were exposed from the groin to the knee. A 2.5-mm-external-diameter angioscope was passed through the medial saphenous vein to just below the proximal superficial femoral vein valve. Under direct vision, an experimental valvulotome passed through one of the angioscope ports cut the valve leaflets. In the contralateral limb, a Mills valvulotome was inserted in the same fashion and blindly cut the valve. Operative time was recorded and difficulties were noted. Bilateral ascending lower limb venography, animal sacrifice, and removal of the vein segment containing the area of previous valvulotomy for gross and histologic study were performed immediately (n = 3), and at 2 (n = 3), 7 (n = 3), 21 (n = 4), and 42 (n = 5) days after valvulotomy. In each case, both techniques had cut the valve leaflets by visual and histologic evaluation. It took significantly longer to perform the operative procedure with the angioscope (8.0 ± 3.7 min) than with the Mills valvulotome (0.8 ± 0.4 min) (P ± 001, Student's ttest). There was no difference in the patency of the venous system by venographic study but evaluation for a histologically normal venous system was more common with the Mills technique. The angioscopic technique demonstrated 8 of 18 samples to be histologically normal versus 14 of 18 by the Mills technique (P ≤ 05, chi-square test). Both techniques are effective in valve leaflet incision. The new angioscope device is more technically demanding (e.g., operative time) and may be more traumatic (e.g., histologic study). However, a gross estimation of luminal damage (venography) does not find the angioscopic method more thrombogenic. The new angioscopically directed device for venous valvulotomy does function effectively. However, adaptation to the in situ bypass technique to replace present angioscopic methods or blind valvulotomy methods requires an appraisal of just what degree of intraluminal trauma is permissible before the risks outweigh the possible benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-75
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Investigative Surgery
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Angioscopes
Femoral Vein
Phlebography
Operative Time
Equipment and Supplies
Groin
Operative Surgical Procedures
Saphenous Vein
Chi-Square Distribution
Lower Extremity
Veins
Knee
Extremities
Dogs
Students
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Angioscopy
  • In situ bypass
  • Vascular surgery
  • Venous valvulotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Angioscopic valvulotomy : Evaluation of a new miniaturized prototype. / Dalsing, Michael; Desanto, Anne Marie; Heimansohn, David A.; Davis, Thomas; Malczenski, Michael.

In: Journal of Investigative Surgery, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1992, p. 61-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dalsing, Michael ; Desanto, Anne Marie ; Heimansohn, David A. ; Davis, Thomas ; Malczenski, Michael. / Angioscopic valvulotomy : Evaluation of a new miniaturized prototype. In: Journal of Investigative Surgery. 1992 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 61-75.
@article{5023becc12074a6eab35decff2d28476,
title = "Angioscopic valvulotomy: Evaluation of a new miniaturized prototype",
abstract = "This study compares valvulotomy performed by a new experimental instrument delivered through the angioscope with the standard technique used in the in situarterial bypass procedure. Eighteen mongrel dogs (≥ 20 kg) were anesthetized and both femoral veins were exposed from the groin to the knee. A 2.5-mm-external-diameter angioscope was passed through the medial saphenous vein to just below the proximal superficial femoral vein valve. Under direct vision, an experimental valvulotome passed through one of the angioscope ports cut the valve leaflets. In the contralateral limb, a Mills valvulotome was inserted in the same fashion and blindly cut the valve. Operative time was recorded and difficulties were noted. Bilateral ascending lower limb venography, animal sacrifice, and removal of the vein segment containing the area of previous valvulotomy for gross and histologic study were performed immediately (n = 3), and at 2 (n = 3), 7 (n = 3), 21 (n = 4), and 42 (n = 5) days after valvulotomy. In each case, both techniques had cut the valve leaflets by visual and histologic evaluation. It took significantly longer to perform the operative procedure with the angioscope (8.0 ± 3.7 min) than with the Mills valvulotome (0.8 ± 0.4 min) (P ± 001, Student's ttest). There was no difference in the patency of the venous system by venographic study but evaluation for a histologically normal venous system was more common with the Mills technique. The angioscopic technique demonstrated 8 of 18 samples to be histologically normal versus 14 of 18 by the Mills technique (P ≤ 05, chi-square test). Both techniques are effective in valve leaflet incision. The new angioscope device is more technically demanding (e.g., operative time) and may be more traumatic (e.g., histologic study). However, a gross estimation of luminal damage (venography) does not find the angioscopic method more thrombogenic. The new angioscopically directed device for venous valvulotomy does function effectively. However, adaptation to the in situ bypass technique to replace present angioscopic methods or blind valvulotomy methods requires an appraisal of just what degree of intraluminal trauma is permissible before the risks outweigh the possible benefits.",
keywords = "Angioscopy, In situ bypass, Vascular surgery, Venous valvulotomy",
author = "Michael Dalsing and Desanto, {Anne Marie} and Heimansohn, {David A.} and Thomas Davis and Michael Malczenski",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.3109/08941939209031594",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "61--75",
journal = "Journal of Investigative Surgery",
issn = "0894-1939",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Angioscopic valvulotomy

T2 - Evaluation of a new miniaturized prototype

AU - Dalsing, Michael

AU - Desanto, Anne Marie

AU - Heimansohn, David A.

AU - Davis, Thomas

AU - Malczenski, Michael

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - This study compares valvulotomy performed by a new experimental instrument delivered through the angioscope with the standard technique used in the in situarterial bypass procedure. Eighteen mongrel dogs (≥ 20 kg) were anesthetized and both femoral veins were exposed from the groin to the knee. A 2.5-mm-external-diameter angioscope was passed through the medial saphenous vein to just below the proximal superficial femoral vein valve. Under direct vision, an experimental valvulotome passed through one of the angioscope ports cut the valve leaflets. In the contralateral limb, a Mills valvulotome was inserted in the same fashion and blindly cut the valve. Operative time was recorded and difficulties were noted. Bilateral ascending lower limb venography, animal sacrifice, and removal of the vein segment containing the area of previous valvulotomy for gross and histologic study were performed immediately (n = 3), and at 2 (n = 3), 7 (n = 3), 21 (n = 4), and 42 (n = 5) days after valvulotomy. In each case, both techniques had cut the valve leaflets by visual and histologic evaluation. It took significantly longer to perform the operative procedure with the angioscope (8.0 ± 3.7 min) than with the Mills valvulotome (0.8 ± 0.4 min) (P ± 001, Student's ttest). There was no difference in the patency of the venous system by venographic study but evaluation for a histologically normal venous system was more common with the Mills technique. The angioscopic technique demonstrated 8 of 18 samples to be histologically normal versus 14 of 18 by the Mills technique (P ≤ 05, chi-square test). Both techniques are effective in valve leaflet incision. The new angioscope device is more technically demanding (e.g., operative time) and may be more traumatic (e.g., histologic study). However, a gross estimation of luminal damage (venography) does not find the angioscopic method more thrombogenic. The new angioscopically directed device for venous valvulotomy does function effectively. However, adaptation to the in situ bypass technique to replace present angioscopic methods or blind valvulotomy methods requires an appraisal of just what degree of intraluminal trauma is permissible before the risks outweigh the possible benefits.

AB - This study compares valvulotomy performed by a new experimental instrument delivered through the angioscope with the standard technique used in the in situarterial bypass procedure. Eighteen mongrel dogs (≥ 20 kg) were anesthetized and both femoral veins were exposed from the groin to the knee. A 2.5-mm-external-diameter angioscope was passed through the medial saphenous vein to just below the proximal superficial femoral vein valve. Under direct vision, an experimental valvulotome passed through one of the angioscope ports cut the valve leaflets. In the contralateral limb, a Mills valvulotome was inserted in the same fashion and blindly cut the valve. Operative time was recorded and difficulties were noted. Bilateral ascending lower limb venography, animal sacrifice, and removal of the vein segment containing the area of previous valvulotomy for gross and histologic study were performed immediately (n = 3), and at 2 (n = 3), 7 (n = 3), 21 (n = 4), and 42 (n = 5) days after valvulotomy. In each case, both techniques had cut the valve leaflets by visual and histologic evaluation. It took significantly longer to perform the operative procedure with the angioscope (8.0 ± 3.7 min) than with the Mills valvulotome (0.8 ± 0.4 min) (P ± 001, Student's ttest). There was no difference in the patency of the venous system by venographic study but evaluation for a histologically normal venous system was more common with the Mills technique. The angioscopic technique demonstrated 8 of 18 samples to be histologically normal versus 14 of 18 by the Mills technique (P ≤ 05, chi-square test). Both techniques are effective in valve leaflet incision. The new angioscope device is more technically demanding (e.g., operative time) and may be more traumatic (e.g., histologic study). However, a gross estimation of luminal damage (venography) does not find the angioscopic method more thrombogenic. The new angioscopically directed device for venous valvulotomy does function effectively. However, adaptation to the in situ bypass technique to replace present angioscopic methods or blind valvulotomy methods requires an appraisal of just what degree of intraluminal trauma is permissible before the risks outweigh the possible benefits.

KW - Angioscopy

KW - In situ bypass

KW - Vascular surgery

KW - Venous valvulotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026599306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026599306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/08941939209031594

DO - 10.3109/08941939209031594

M3 - Article

C2 - 1576107

AN - SCOPUS:0026599306

VL - 5

SP - 61

EP - 75

JO - Journal of Investigative Surgery

JF - Journal of Investigative Surgery

SN - 0894-1939

IS - 1

ER -